Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017803
Original file (20130017803.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF

		BOARD DATE:	    14 August 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130017803 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests reconsideration of his earlier request for award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with bronze star, the Valorous Unit Award, and a Vietnamese unit award.

2.  The applicant states that based on his military records, he should have been authorized the awards.  Since his unit only had two tracks (tracked vehicles), they were attached to a larger battalion, in this case, Battery C, 1st Battalion, 92nd Field Artillery.  Accordingly, Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) will not list some of his unit's awards.

3.  The applicant provides:

* a letter and request for assistance from a U.S. Senator
* seven pages of electronic mail
* Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross (Auh-Dung Boi Tinh) Certificate
* a photograph

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20110014648 on 24 January 2012.

2.  The applicant provides a photograph, unit history information from the Internet, and other assorted correspondence which was not previously reviewed by the ABCMR.  Therefore, it is considered new evidence and warrants consideration by the Board.

3.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 12 May 1970.  He served in the Republic of Vietnam from 24 September 1970 to           23 November 1971.  Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Report) shows he served with Battery B, 4th Battalion, 60th Artillery during his entire tour in the Republic of Vietnam.  

4.  On 24 November 1971, he was honorably released from active duty in the rank/grade of specialist four/E-4 after completing 1 year, 6 months, and 13 days of active duty service.  His DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) shows he was awarded or authorized the:

* National Defense Service Medal
* Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar
* Vietnam Service Medal
* Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960)
* Bronze Star Medal
* Army Good Conduct Medal

5.  On 24 January 2012, the ABCMR directed correction of the applicant's DD Form 214 by deleting the Bronze Star Medal and Vietnam Service Medal and by adding the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device, Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars, and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation.

6.  The applicant provides:

   a.  An internet history of the 1st Battalion, 92nd Field Artillery, citing General Order Number 3550, dated 22 December 1971, which awarded the Valorous Unit Award to Battery C, 1st Battalion, 92nd Artillery and its assigned and attached units:  Liaison Team, Headquarters and Headquarters Battery, 1st Battalion, 92nd Artillery, and the 120 Section, Battery B, 4th Battalion, 60th Artillery. 

   b.  A photograph of a Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with bronze star, a Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross (Auh-Dung Boi Tinh) Certificate, and several pages of electronic mail. 

7.  U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation Number 672-2 (Foreign Awards and Decorations) stated the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross as a personal decoration was awarded to personnel who conducted themselves with heroic action and displayed deeds of valor while fighting the enemy.  The more gallant and noteworthy the act, the higher the level of the award.  This decoration was awarded in four degrees: with Palm, with Gold Star, with Silver Star, and with Bronze Star.  Approval to accept and to wear a personal award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross required approval by the Commanding General of United States Army, Vietnam.  As with all foreign awards, each recipient of an approved foreign award was provided a copy of the original citation from the foreign government, a translation of the citation if necessary, and a letter authorizing the recipient to receive and wear the decoration.     

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Valorous Unit Award is awarded for extraordinary heroism in action against an armed enemy of the United States while engaged in military operations involving conflict with an opposing foreign force or while serving with friendly foreign forces engaged in an armed conflict in which the United States is not a belligerent party for actions occurring on or after 3 August 1963.  This award requires a lesser degree of gallantry, determination, and esprit de corps than required for the Presidential Unit Citation.  Nevertheless, the unit must have performed with marked distinction under difficult and hazardous conditions in accomplishing its mission so as to set it apart from and above other units participating in the same conflict.  The degree of heroism required is the same as that which would warrant award of the Silver Star to an individual.

9.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 does not show that 4th Battalion, 60th Artillery was awarded a Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with bronze star, a Valorous Unit Award, or any other Vietnamese unit award while he was assigned to the unit.

10.  General Order Number 3550, issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Vietnam on 22 December 1971, awarded the Valorous Unit Award to 120 Section, Battery B, 4th Battalion, 60th Artillery, among others.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with bronze star, Valorous Unit Award, and a Vietnamese Unit Award has been carefully reconsidered; however, there remains insufficient evidence to support his claim.

2.  The Board begins its consideration of each case with a presumption of regularity; that is, what Army records reflect is correct and the burden of proving otherwise rests with the applicant.  
3.  The applicant provided a copy of his Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross (Auh-Dung Boi Tinh) Certificate and a photograph of a Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with bronze star, unfortunately, there is no evidence in his military records to show he was ever authorized to accept and wear this foreign award as required by the governing regulation.

4.  General orders awarded the Valorous Unit Award to 120 Section, Battery B, 4th Battalion, 60th Artillery.  Unfortunately, the applicant's record contains insufficient evidence to show he was assigned to the 120 Section, Battery B, 4th Battalion, 60th Artillery.  Therefore, in view of the foregoing, there is insufficient evidence to support the requested relief. 

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X___  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis to amend the decision of the ABCMR set forth in Docket Number AR20110014648, dated 24 January 2012.





      __________X___________
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130017803





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130017803



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014648

    Original file (20110014648.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that based on his military records, he should have been authorized the awards but they were never entered on his DD Form 214. Based on his service with the 4th Battalion, 60th Artillery while in Vietnam, he is also entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050007611C070206

    Original file (20050007611C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 22 December 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050007611 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requested, in effect, correction of his records to show an award of the Army Commendation Medal. There are no orders or other evidence on file in his record authorizing award of the Army Commendation Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014469

    Original file (20100014469.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Vietnam Service Medal is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973. Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected by adding in item 22c 11 months and 23 days and amending item 30 to show the entry "28 December 1966 to 20 December 1967 service in the RVN." As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015143

    Original file (20110015143.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the DD Form 214 he was issued for this period of service shows the: * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) * Purple Heart 9. The evidence of record does not show he was disqualified from receiving the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 7 July 1967 through 3 July...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001056658C070420

    Original file (2001056658C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military records show that he enlisted in the Army for three years on 29 December 1967. His DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) shows that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, and the Vietnam Campaign Medal. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the applicant was awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal with four bronze service stars, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028428

    Original file (20100028428.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show: * two bronze service stars for his Vietnam Service Medal * Meritorious Unit Commendation * two awards of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation * Bronze Star Medal 2. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016627

    Original file (20130016627.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Bronze Star Medal. Records show the applicant participated in three campaigns during his service in the Republic of Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting the Vietnam Service Medal from his DD Form 214; and b. adding the following awards to his DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013073

    Original file (20100013073.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the: * Purple Heart * Combat Action Badge * Red bar or red ribbon [properly known as the Meritorious Unit Commendation] with oak leaf cluster * Presidential Unit Citation 2. His records show he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070005317

    Original file (20070005317.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 19 September 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070005317 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. There are no general orders and there is no evidence in the applicant's service records that show he was awarded the CIB. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016729

    Original file (20100016729.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He provides: * DD Form 214 * DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) * various assignment orders while assigned in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) * 725th Maintenance Battalion, 25th Infantry Division Certificate of Achievement, dated 19 November 1970 * Army Commendation Medal Citation, for the period January 1970 to November 1970 * two DA Forms 137 (Installation Clearance Record) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good...