IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 17 June 2014
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130017630
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant, the daughter of the deceased former service member (FSM), requests, in effect, that the FSM's military records be corrected by showing she timely and properly filed a claim for the FSM's unpaid compensation.
2. The applicant states she filed her claim in 2002 along with her three sisters. While their claims were paid, the applicant's claim was not paid.
3. The applicant provides copies of:
* A Certificate of Live Birth, issued 28 June 2001, for the applicant
* A Certificate of Death, issued 3 December 2001, for the FSM
* A letter from the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) to the applicant, dated 23 September 2002
* A Standard Form (SF) 1174 (Claim for Unpaid Compensation of Deceased Member of the Uniformed Services) dated 19 November 2002
* A letter from DFAS to the applicant, dated 24 July 2012
* Email communications dated 6-8 February 2013 between DFAS and the applicant
* A letter from the applicant to the Secretary of the Army, dated 9 February 2013
* A letter from the Director, Army Transition Office, U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC) to the applicant, dated 19 March 2013
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The FSM enlisted in the Regular Army on or about 6 July 1949. He attained the rank of sergeant major, pay grade E-9, and retired due to length of service on 31 August 1969. The FSM died on 20 November 2001.
3. In a letter dated 23 September 2002, DFAS informed the applicant that her SF 1174 required signatures from two witnesses; her signature on the reverse side; and her social security number which was written on the front of the letter.
4. The applicant completed an SF 1174 dated 19 November 2002 which shows signatures from two witnesses and her signature.
5. In a letter dated 24 July 2012, DFAS informed the applicant that her request for unpaid compensation from the military retired pay account of the FSM could not be paid because it had been more than 6 years since the FSM's death and now exceeds the statute of limitations. She was also informed that she could apply to the U.S. Army for a waiver of the 6-year statute of limitations.
6. The email communications between DFAS and the applicant, dated in February 2013, state that DFAS had sent a letter to each of the FSM's four children requesting them to complete the enclosed form and return it to DFAS. Three of the children did so, but the applicant's response was never received. She was advised that her only option was to request a waiver of the 6-year statute of limitations as stated in the letter dated 24 July 2012.
7. On 9 February 2013, the applicant submitted a letter to the Secretary of the Army requesting a waiver of the 6-year statute of limitations so her claim can be paid.
8. On 19 March 2013, the Director, Army Transition Office, HRC, responded to the applicant's letter discussed in the previous paragraph. She was informed that the Reserve Component Retirement Branch does not have the authority to waive the 6-year statute of limitations for unpaid compensation for retired pay. She was further informed that she could appeal her case to this Board, and was provided an application.
9. Title 31, U.S. Code, section 3702, is the 6-year barring statute for payment of claims by the government. In essence, if an individual brings a claim against the government for monetary relief, the barring statute says that the government is only obligated to pay the individual 6 years from the date of approval of the claim. Attacks to the barring statute have resulted in litigation in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims. In the case of Pride versus the United States, the court held that the Board for Correction of Military Records (BCMR) is not bound by the barring act, that the BCMR decision creates a new entitlement to payment and the 6 years starts running over again, and that payment is automatic and not discretionary when a BCMR decision creates an entitlement.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant contends, in effect, that the FSM's military records should be corrected by showing that she filed a timely and properly-constituted claim for the FSM's unpaid compensation.
2. The available documents show that the FSM died in 2001 and that three of the four children had filed for unclaimed compensation in 2002. It appears the applicant's original claim was not received. Furthermore, her subsequent claims were incomplete and received after the 6-year statute of limitations had run its course.
3. It appears there were administrative errors compounded by misinformation given to the applicant about where to file her request for assistance with this problem.
4. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct the records to show that the applicant had filed a properly-constituted SF 1174 within the 6-year statute of limitations and that she be paid accordingly.
BOARD VOTE:
____x___ ___x____ ___x_____ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:
a. showing the applicant filed a properly-constituted SF 1174 for the FSMs unpaid compensation within the 6-year statute of limitations; and
b. paying her accordingly.
___________x___________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20130017630
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20130017630
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022984
This research confirmed that DFAS did not receive an annuity application from her mother or a written claim for the annuity within 6 years of the FSM's death. As such, and only as a matter of equity, the FSM's records should be corrected to show his widow, the applicant's deceased mother, made a timely request for payment of the SBP annuity based on the FSM's death and her request was received and processed by DFAS shortly after the FSM's death. As a result, the Board recommends that all...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009308
The applicant provides copes of: * the FSM's DA Form 4240 * death certificate for the FSM and his spouse * birth certificates * FSM's Chronological Record of Military Service (retirement points record) * Eric Roger W-----, the FSM's grandson's, designation of the applicant as General Power of Attorney (POA), signed, witnessed and notarized on 19 April 2013 * Standard Form 1174 (Claim for Unpaid Compensation of Deceased Member of the Uniformed Services), signed by the applicant as executor of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050008789C070206
DFAS stated in the letter that the FSM's account had been corrected to show spouse coverage only, based on full gross retired pay at a monthly cost of $93.60. Therefore, since the evidence clearly shows that the applicant and his mother made timely attempts to file for SBP, it would be in the interest of justice for the Board to recommend that the FSM's records be corrected to show that the FSM's spouse, the applicant’s mother, applied for SBP, (spousal coverage only, based on full gross...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000857
On 1 July 2008, by letter, the VA notified the FSM's daughter, Melody, that a special review of the FSM's claims file was mandated by court. On 19 November 2013, by letter, DFAS notified the applicant that her claim for unpaid compensation from the FSM's military retired pay could not be paid due to the statute of limitations (Title 31, U.S. Code, section 3702). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000857 (3)
On 1 July 2008, by letter, the VA notified the FSM's daughter, Melody, that a special review of the FSM's claims file was mandated by court. On 19 November 2013, by letter, DFAS notified the applicant that her claim for unpaid compensation from the FSM's military retired pay could not be paid due to the statute of limitations (Title 31, U.S. Code, section 3702). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000857
On 1 July 2008, by letter, the VA notified the FSM's daughter, Melody, that a special review of the FSM's claims file was mandated by court. On 19 November 2013, by letter, DFAS notified the applicant that her claim for unpaid compensation from the FSM's military retired pay could not be paid due to the statute of limitations (Title 31, U.S. Code, section 3702). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005685
The applicant states she is not claiming any error exists in the FSM's record. On 23 June 1993, DFAS communicated with the applicant regarding the annuity and arrears of pay. There was no SBP annuity at the time of his death because he elected not to participate in the SBP.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000840
The applicant, the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests, in effect, correction of the FSM's record to show she filed a claim for a survivor benefit annuity on the day following the FSM's death and payment of unpaid benefits from that date. She only got her identification card in 2003 when she was advised of her benefits by the Army National Guard (ARNG) at which time the FSM's military records still showed him as alive and married to his former spouse. The applicant...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008441
The applicant, the widow of a former service member (FSM), requests, in effect, correction of the FSM's records to show she is entitled to Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) benefits. The applicant provides copies of: * two self-authored Petitions * birth certificates for the FSM, herself, and their son * her and the FSM's marriage license * the FSM's Retirement Orders * the FSMs DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) * the FSM's certificate of death * a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008244
The applicant requests, in effect, correction to the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), to show he elected Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) former spouse coverage. There is no evidence the FSM submitted a request to change his SBP election from spouse to former spouse coverage as a result of their divorce. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the FSM concerned be corrected by: a. showing the FSM changed his SBP coverage...