BOARD DATE: 29 May 2014
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130016833
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show award of the Vietnam Service Medal and any other awards he is entitled to receive for his service in Vietnam.
2. The applicant states, in effect, that he served in Vietnam and he should be entitled to additional awards for that service.
3. The applicant provides a letter from a service organization and a DD Form 214.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. On 10 January 1961, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 3 years. He completed the training requirements and he was awarded military occupational specialty 631.10 (Wheel Vehicle Mechanic).
3. On 11 September 1961, he was transferred to Hawaii where he remained until he was transferred to Vietnam on 15 May 1963. He was assigned to the U.S. Army Support Group Vietnam.
4. He departed Vietnam on 6 December 1963 and was transferred to Oakland Army Base, California where he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) as an overseas returnee on 9 December 1963. He had served 2 years and 11 months of active service of which 6 months and 22 days was served in Vietnam. His DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows that he was awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) (Vietnam), 1-Year Safe Driver Badge with Driver Bar, and the Basic Missileman Badge.
5. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the National Defense Service Medal is awarded for honorable active service for any period between
27 July 1950 and 27 July 1954, 1 January 1961 and 14 August 1974, 2 August 1990 and 30 November 1995, and 11 September 2001 and a date to be determined.
6. Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the AFEM is awarded for qualifying service after 1 July 1958 in military operations within a specific geographic area during a specified time period. It states individuals qualified for the AFEM for service in Vietnam from 1 July 1958 and 3 July 1965 (inclusive) shall remain qualified for that medal. Upon request, the Vietnam Service Medal may be awarded in lieu of the AFEM, but the regulation requires that the AFEM be removed from the records of the individual. No person will be entitled to both awards for Vietnam service.
7. Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the Vietnam Service Medal is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973. Qualifying service included attachment to or assignment for 1 or more days with an organization participating in or directly supporting military operations. A bronze service star will be awarded for wear on the Vietnam Service Medal for participation in each campaign. Service members who earned the AFEM for service in Vietnam between 1 July 1958 and 3 July 1965 may elect to receive the Vietnam Service Medal instead of the AFEM. However, no service member may be issued both medals for service in Vietnam.
8. Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) was awarded by the Government of Vietnam to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961 through 28 March 1973. Qualifying service included assignment in Vietnam for 6 months or more.
9. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the awards received by units serving in Vietnam. This pamphlet shows his unit was cited for award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation during the period the applicant served with the unit.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant was awarded the AFEM for his service in Vietnam and thus is not entitled to award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) unless he requests in writing to exchange the AFEM for the VSM.
2. However, the applicant served during a qualifying period for award of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) and the National Defense Service Medal and is entitled to have those awards entered on his
DD Form 214.
3. Additionally, his unit was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation during the period he served with the unit; therefore, he is entitled to have that award added to his DD Form 214.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
__X_____ __X______ _X____ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
1. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), National Defense Service Medal, and Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation to his DD Form 214.
2. The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to adding the Vietnam Service Medal to his DD Form 214.
3. The Board wants the applicant and all others to know that the sacrifices he made in service to the United States during the Vietnam War are deeply appreciated. The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.
_______ _ X_______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20130016833
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20130016833
4
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004729
The regulation in effect at the time provided that the total active duty outside the continental limits of the United States for the period covered by the DD Form 214 and the last overseas theater in which the service was performed would be entered in item 24c. The entry in item 29 of the applicant's DA Form 20 which shows he served in Vietnam from 6 October 1963 through 26 September 1964 is accepted as sufficient evidence on which to add the entry "Vietnam Service: 6 October 1963 to 26...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120013327
Orders, dated 21 May 1965, show he received the Army Commendation Medal for meritorious service during the period July 1963 to November 1964. It states individuals qualified for the AFEM for service in Vietnam from 1 July 1958 and 3 July 1965 (inclusive) shall remain qualified for that medal. The applicant served in Vietnam during a qualifying period; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this unit award.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016442
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) with one bronze service star, and Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960). d. The Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) was awarded by the Government of Vietnam to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017500
His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) includes an entry which shows he served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) from 6 January to 25 November 1962, while assigned with the 3rd RRU. The VSM did not exist during the applicant's military service and therefore, his record should be corrected to show his entitlement to the AFEM. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. adding the following awards to item 26...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022638
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) in lieu of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM). The VSM is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021545
The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show all awarded or authorized awards for his service in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN). Service medals and awards are not issued by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from his DD Form 214, as previously...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017741
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Vietnam Service Medal. His record shows he served a qualifying period of service for award of the National Defense Service Medal and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960). * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation ______________X_____________ CHAIRPERSON I...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110025219
The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the AFEM for his service in Vietnam. His record does not contain evidence which shows he was authorized by the Commanding General of United States Army Vietnam to wear this as a personal award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal from his 24 June 1966 DD Form 214 and b. adding the following awards to his...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005730
Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the AGCM was awarded to enlisted Soldiers who had completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. Therefore, his records should be corrected to show this service medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 12 September 1962 to 2 September 1964; b. deleting from his DD...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022206
c. The RVN Campaign Medal with Device (1960) was awarded by the Government of Vietnam to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961 through 28 March 1973. The evidence of record confirms he served an honorable period of active duty service between 18 March 1963 and 7 March 1966; therefore, he is entitled to award of the NDSM and to have this award added to his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all...