Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016694
Original file (20130016694.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	   

		BOARD DATE:	  20 May 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130016694 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his military records to show he transferred his educational benefits to his dependents under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill.

2.  The applicant states he was not briefed during the Army Career and Alumni Program (ACAP) that he had to transfer benefits while serving on active duty.

3.  The applicant provides no additional evidence.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  He enlisted in the Regular Army on 19 July 2005 after completing 8 years, 1 month, and 5 days of prior active military service.  He was promoted to sergeant (SGT)/pay grade E-5 on 1 March 2007.  He immediately reenlisted on 20 April 2007 and 9 April 2010.

2.  U.S. Army Installation Management Command, Headquarters, U.S. Army Garrison Command, Fort Knox, KY, Orders 031-0169, dated 31 January 2012, assigned the applicant to the U.S. Army Transition Center, Fort Knox, KY, for transition processing effective 21 March 2012.

3.  He checked the "Yes" block in item 13a (Education/Training - Education Benefits (Montgomery GI Bill) of his DD Form 2648 (Preseparation Counseling Checklist for Active Component Service Members).  Items checked are mandatory for service members to receive further information or counseling, or attend additional workshops, briefings, classes, etc.

4.  On 8 April 2012, he was honorably discharged by reason of completion of required active service.  He completed 6 years, 8 months, and 20 days of active service during this period.  His total active service was 11 years, 10 months, and 24 days.

5.  Military Personnel Message Number 11-096, dated 25 March 2011, subject:  Change to Retention Control Points (RCP) for Enlisted Soldiers Serving in the Regular Army or under the Active Guard Reserve Title 10 Programs, stated the RCP for SGT was 13 years and 15 years for promotable SGT.

6.  Department of Defense (DOD) Directive-Type Memorandum 09-003, dated 22 June 2009, established the criteria for eligibility and transfer of unused educational benefits to eligible family members.

	a.  An eligible individual is any member of the Armed Forces on or after 1 August 2009 who, at the time of the approval of the individual's request to transfer entitlement to educational assistance under this section, is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill and

		(1)  has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve) on the date of election and agrees to serve 4 additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of election, or

		(2)  has at least 10 years of service in the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve) on the date of election, is precluded by either standard policy (Service or DOD) or statute from committing to 4 additional years, and agrees to serve for the maximum amount of time allowed by such policy or statute.

	b.  An individual approved to transfer entitlement to educational assistance may transfer such entitlement to the individual's family member(s) only while serving as a member of the Armed Forces.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  He contends he was not briefed during the ACAP that he had to transfer benefits while serving on active duty.  However, he was assigned to the Fort Knox Transition Center 2 weeks prior to his discharge date for mandated preseparation counseling.  He indicated on his DD Form 2648 that he desired to receive further information or counseling.  He provided no evidence to show he did not receive this counseling.

2.  The applicant was eligible to transfer benefits to his dependents at any time after 1 August 2009.  However, he would have been required to agree to serve 4 additional years from the date of his request, regardless of the number of months transferred.  At the time of his discharge he would have been unable to commit to 4 additional years due to reaching the RCP for SGT.  However, he would have had to commit to serve for the maximum amount of time allowed by his RCP.

3.  The DOD, Department of Veterans Affairs, and the Army conducted a massive public campaign plan that generated major communications through military, public, and social media venues.  The information was published well in advance with emphasis on the criteria.  While there may have been some confusion during the early stages after the implementation, the applicant was discharged nearly 3 years after the program was implemented.

4.  In view of the above, there is no basis upon which to grant relief in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ____x___  ____x____  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case 
are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   _x______   ___
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130016694



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130016694



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013148

    Original file (20140013148.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he transferred his education benefits to his dependents under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill prior to retiring from military service. The applicant contends that his records should be corrected to show he elected to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill educational benefits to his dependents because he was not informed of the approved cut-off date nor was he offered the opportunity to extend his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002226

    Original file (20110002226.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army and Department of Defense (DOD) policy require a Soldier to be on active duty or a member of the Selected Reserve in order to transfer benefits. The evidence of record shows he was not fully eligible to transfer his education benefits under the TEB prior to his retirement on 27 April 2010. The applicant did not have 10 years of service; or c. be retirement eligible.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021585

    Original file (20130021585.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to reveal any evidence of a request to transfer educational benefits (TEB) to any of his family members. The applicant contends that his records should be corrected to show he elected to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill educational benefits to his spouse because he was not properly counseled on the transfer of his educational benefits prior to his retirement from active duty. Thus, the applicant retired from the RA without...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004376

    Original file (20130004376.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Although significant measures were made by DOD, the VA, and the Army to disseminate the information to all Soldiers within all Army components during the initial phase of the program, many Soldiers who left the service during the first 90 days of the program were not fully aware of the requirement to transfer benefits prior to leaving military service. The applicant commenced his transition leave during the first week after initial implementation of the TEB. As a result, the Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006555

    Original file (20130006555.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Although significant measures were made by DOD, the VA, and the Army to disseminate the information to all Soldiers within all Army components during the initial phase of the program, many Soldiers who left the service during the first 90 days of the program were not fully aware of the requirement to transfer benefits prior to leaving military service. The available evidence shows the applicant was fully eligible to transfer her educational benefits under the TEB provision of the Post-9/11...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022788

    Original file (20110022788.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    BOARD DATE: 5 June 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110022788 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The advisory official recommended disapproval of the applicant's request because the applicant's last day on active duty was 31 July 2009. The policy further states the Secretaries of the Military Departments will provide active duty participants and members of the Reserve Components with qualifying active duty service individual pre-separation or release from active duty counseling on the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012851

    Original file (20140012851.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he transferred his education benefits to his dependents under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill prior to retiring from military service. The applicant contends that his records should be corrected to show he elected to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill educational benefits to his dependents because he was not properly counseled on TEB prior to his retirement from active duty. Thus, the applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013222

    Original file (20130013222.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Upon his separation from the Army he was not informed of the need to transfer his education benefits to his spouse while still serving on active duty. A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of Reserve service. The evidence of record shows the applicant was serving on active duty until his retirement on 19 May 2012.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04962

    Original file (BC-2012-04962.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force which is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial, indicating the applicant was approved for retirement on 19 May 09, nearly three full months prior to the start of the program on 1 Aug 09. The applicant has not provided any evidence that he was never briefed of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005263

    Original file (20130005263.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests approval for transfer of his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his eligible family members. The applicant provides a DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), outprocessing notes, and Education Center notes. He contends that he was not counseled prior to his discharge; however, the evidence of record shows he declined further counseling in regard to the Post 9/11 GI Bill education benefits on 21 May 2012.