BOARD DATE: 12 June 2014
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130016494
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests his under honorable conditions (general) discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge.
2. The applicant states that a series of honorable discharges, commendation letters, and awards followed his 8 June 1951 discharge his service; therefore, his character of service should be determined to be honorable.
3. The applicant provides a transcript from his enlisted record, separation documents, numerous awards, certificates of training, and honorable discharge certificates received subsequent to his undesirable discharge. These documents are listed in an attachment provided with this application.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The complete facts and circumstances surrounding his discharge are not available for review with this case. However, the available record contains a partial Criminal Investigation Division (CID) Report, Subject: [applicant] , completed on 20 November 1951. The investigation determined that the applicant smoked several cigarettes containing an opium derivative on the evening of 9 May 1951 and he purchased narcotic drugs from unidentified cab drivers in Japan. The applicant was taken into custody on 10 May 1951.
3. His DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) shows he was discharged on 8 June 1951 under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-368 (Enlisted Men - Discharge - Unfitness (Undesirable Habits or Traits of Character)) with an undesirable discharge in the pay grade of private (PVT/E-1). This form also shows he had 18 days of lost time.
4. The applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) and requested an upgrade of his discharge. On 29 December 1951, the ADRB determined that after reviewing the facts connected with his discharge he was entitled to a discharge certificate under honorable conditions.
5. On 24 January 1952, he was issued a DD Form 215 (Correction to Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) which shows the following changes in:
* item 3 (Grade-Rate-and Date of Appointment) - "Private First Class 1 Nov 50"
* item 8 (Reason and Authority for Discharge) - "Section 301 Public Law 346 78th Congress approved 22 June 1944 and AR 615-365"
6. He reenlisted in the Regular Army on 4 June 1952 and was honorably retired in the pay grade of sergeant first class (SFC/E-7) on 31 January 1970.
7. The applicant provides numerous military achievements received subsequent to his initial discharge which include letters of appreciation/commendation, awards, a recommendation for promotion to master sergeant, training certificates, military course completions, and honorable discharge certificates.
8. Army Regulation 615-368, in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel by reason of unfitness. That regulation provided for the discharge of individuals who had demonstrated their unfitness by giving evidence of undesirable habits of character manifested by misconduct. At the time of the applicants separation, the regulation provided for the issuance of an undesirable discharge.
9. Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), currently in effect, governs the policies and procedures for the separation of enlisted personnel. Paragraph 3-7a provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law. The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the members service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel (emphasis added), or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate.
10. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.
11. Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army, acting through the ABCMR. The regulation provides that the ABCMR begins its consideration of each case with the presumption of administrative regularity. The applicant has the burden of proving an error or injustice by a preponderance of the evidence.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation
615-368 for unfitness with an undesirable discharge on 8 June 1951.
2. Subsequently, the ADRB reviewed his overall service and approved his request for an upgrade of his discharge. The board directed that he be issued an under honorable conditions (general) discharge. This decision does not imply that the separation authority made an incorrect decision, an administrative error, or failed to comply with applicable laws and regulations. His service record was considered and addressed in the form of an upgrade in the characterization of his service to general.
3. It is noted that he honorably completed an additional 18 years of military service but this does not negate his past misconduct which included 18 days of lost time and the use of illegal drugs. Based on the available record, his characterization of service for the period in question does not meet the standard of acceptable conduct and performance to warrant an upgrade to an honorable discharge.
4. Based on the foregoing, there is insufficient evidence or argument to justify granting the requested relief.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___X_____ __X______ ___X_ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_______ _ X_______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20130016494
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20130016494
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001307
On 28 June 1953, the FSM's unit recommended a board of officers be convened to determine whether the FSM should be discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-368 (Enlisted Personnel - Discharge - Unfitness). The certificate, dated 12 June 1953, issued by the Psychiatry and Neurology Service, USAH, Camp Atterbury, essentially stated: * the FSM's diagnosis was anti-social personality manifested by immaturity, impulsive behavior, lack of adequate standards of behavior, and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050018247C070206
On 10 June 1981 the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant's petition to upgrade his discharge. The U.S. Court of Appeals, observing that applicants to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) are by statute allowed 15 years to apply there, and that this Board's exhaustion requirement (Army Regulation 15-185, paragraph 2-8), effectively shortens that filing period, has determined that the 3 year limit on filing to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) should...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000290C070205
There is no evidence that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for an upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations. There is no evidence in the applicant's records, and the applicant has provided none, to show that on or about 1955 he received an honorable discharge, under general amnesty. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show, to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise appear, that the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070004115
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 9 August 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070004115 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The records available to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records were provided in part by the applicant and from reconstructed records. On 14 August 1953, the appropriate authority approved the applicant's...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006705
Also on 12 May 1952, the applicant's immediate commander requested a board of officers be convened under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-368 (Enlisted Men - Discharge - Unfitness (Undesirable Habits or Traits of Character)) for the purpose of determining the applicant's fitness for retention due to his habitual AWOL. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, states a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. The board found him unfit for retention and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011763
The board found that the applicant gives evidence of habits and gives evidence of traits of character which rendered retention in the service undesirable and recommended that the applicant be discharged from the service because of unfitness and that he be furnished an undesirable discharge. Evidence of record shows the applicant completed 3 years, 3 months, and 9 days of creditable active service when he was discharged. Although the applicants daughter contends that they have no...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005503
He returned to the Continental United States in March 1954. d. In September 1954, he was convicted by an SPCM for being AWOL from 12 June to 4 September 1954. e. In February 1955, he was convicted by an SPCM for being AWOL from 24 January to 16 February 1955. f. In March 1955, while in confinement, the FSMs commanding officer requested the FSM be required to appear before a board of officers convened under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-368 (Undesirable Habits or Traits of Character...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016650
The applicant requests upgrade of his undesirable discharge to a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The applicants military record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army in pay grade E-1 on 20 February 1951, for 3 years. However, his records contain a copy of his DD Form 214 which shows he was discharged on 23 September 1955 in pay grade E-1, under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-368, with an undesirable discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012053
The board of officers found that the evidence showed the applicant to have habits which rendered retention in the military undesirable and recommended that the applicant be discharged from the service because of unfitness and that he be given an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. Accordingly, the applicant was discharged on 29 April 1954 and issued an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001061279C070421
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: However, there is no evidence of record, and the applicant has provided no evidence, to support this contention.