IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 3 June 2014
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130016400
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests upgrade of his dishonorable discharge.
2. The applicant states it has been almost 30 years since the incident and he's never gotten into trouble. Instead, he has become a very productive citizen.
3. The applicant provides 21 separate enclosures to document his current life and his educational and vocational accomplishments.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. On 28 December 1977 the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army. He completed training as a materiel storage and handling specialist. He was stationed in Hawaii, was advanced to pay grade E-4, and reenlisted in June 1980. He was transferred to Fort Story, Virginia where he received a letter of commendation for his duty performance.
3. The applicant was then transferred to Germany in July 1982. He received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for two instances of absence from his place of duty.
4. On 17 August 1984, a general courtmartial found the applicant pled guilty to two specifications of violating a lawful general regulation by carrying a concealed weapon and possessing an unregistered weapon. He pled not guilty to assault to commit murder but was found guilty of the lesser included charge of aggravated assault by intentionally inflicting grievous bodily harm. He was sentenced to forfeiture of all pay and allowances, reduction to pay grade E-1, confinement for 9 years, and a dishonorable discharge. The convening authority approved the sentence and, except for the dishonorable discharge, ordered it executed.
5. In March 1985, while confined at the United States Disciplinary Barracks, Fort Leavenworth, Kansas the applicant applied to this Board for removal of the NJP, restoration to rank and pay grade, and a removal of a bar to reenlistment. He based this request upon alleged possible mishandling of urinalysis testing. His request was denied by the Board because there was no nexus between the NJP and any bar to reenlistment and any drug testing.
6. The Army Court of Military Review approved the findings but reduced the sentence to confinement to 6 years. The United States Court of Military Appeals declined to consider the case.
7. On 25 April, Article 71(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice having been complied with, the dishonorable discharge was ordered executed. The applicant was separated with a dishonorable discharge on 23 May 1986.
8. In support of this request the applicant submits copies of
* his 1980 Honorable Discharge Certificate from his reenlistment
* 1986 DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty)
* Certificate of Graduation from the International Dealers School, Las Vegas, Nevada, dated May 1990
* Certificate of Training by The Educational Society of Resource Management, dated August 1998
* Diploma Dahan Institute of Massage Studies, dated October 2001
* Transcript Dahan Institute of Massage Studies, dated October 2001
* Certificate of Training as a Customer Service representative, dated January 2003
* Baptism Certificate, dated May 2004
* laudatory incident report for customer service at a Budget Rental Car agency, dated , October 2006
* Transportation Safety Administration conditional appointment, dated February 2006
* Nevada Driver License, expired May 2013
* U.S. Department of Labor certificate of completion of 10 hours of construction health and safety, dated September 2008
* certificate of completion of safety training as a heavy equipment operator, dated August 2008
* Specified Technologies Incorporated, Firestop training certificate, undated
* résumé listing employment commencing in May 1989
* State of Nevada Department of Motor Vehicles driving history
* résumé in a different format - indicating 12 years service as a storage and handling specialist
* transcript Everest University indicating completion of two business courses, dated July 2010
* Certificate of Completion, Las Vegas School of Insurance
* promotional flyers for two science fiction thriller novels listing the applicant as a co-author
9. Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations) sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel:
a. Paragraph 3-7a states an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law. The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the members service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel, or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate.
b. Paragraph 3-7b states a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.
10. Court-martial convictions stand as adjudged or modified by appeal through the judicial process. In accordance with Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552, the authority under which this Board acts, the ABCMR is not empowered to set aside a conviction. Rather it is only empowered to change the severity of the sentence imposed in the court-martial process and then only if clemency is determined to be appropriate. Clemency is an act of mercy, or instance of leniency, to moderate the severity of the punishment imposed.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant's drive to improve his education and employment standing is noted and noteworthy. He has obviously applied himself to getting ahead.
2. However, this does nothing to demonstrate that there was or is an injustice in the discharge.
3. Trial by court-martial was warranted by the gravity of the offenses charged. Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations, and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which the applicant was convicted.
4. The applicant has submitted neither probative evidence nor a convincing argument in support of the request.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
____X___ ___X_____ ____X____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_______ _ _X______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20130016400
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20130016400
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00094
I 1 AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2003-00094 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, change the reason and authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code. The records indicated the applicant received a General Discharge due to a Special Court Martial for falsely altering military identification cards. For your actions, you were verbally counseled and placed in remedial training on or about 19 Dec 97; h....
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007307
The applicant requests that his home of record (HOR) on his military records be changed to show 1*** B***** Street, West City, Illinois 62812. This is especially significant since he provided information at the time of his enlistment in the Regular Army that fails to show that he ever resided at an address in West City, Illinois. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0258
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016357
The applicant requests that his home of record (HOR) be changed to Austin, Texas. At the time of his enlistment he indicated his HOR was in Austin, Texas. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing his HOR as the same address in Austin, Texas that is reflected on his DD Form 4/1.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004496
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. Section VI (Conviction by Civil Court) of Army Regulation 635-206, then in effect, states, in pertinent part, that an individual will be considered for discharge when he has been initially convicted by civil authorities, or action has been taken against him which is tantamount to a finding of guilty, of an offense for which the maximum penalty under the UCMJ is death or confinement in excess of 1 year. Army Regulation 635-206 also...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010293
By law and regulation, the HOR is the place recorded as the home of the individual at the time of their enlistment or induction, and there is no authority to change the HOR officially recorded at the time of entry into military service unless it is based on evidence that a bona fide error was made. In this case, the evidence of record shows that the applicant listed his HOR as Natrona Heights, PA on his enlistment document. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army...
NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-01024
The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable or entry level separation and that the narrative reason for separation be changed to Expiration of Term of Service, with a letter from the NDRB recommending the Applicant for government service. F_” or “Applicant”) hereby submits this application to upgrade his discharge characterization from Other Than Honorable (OTH) to Honorable or Entry Level Separation, and to change the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003697
She did not kidnap the victim and she was not trying to pull rank on the victim. On 2 March 1990, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of chapter 3, Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), as a result of court-martial with a dishonorable discharge. Simply put, the punitive discharge cannot be ordered executed until all appeals have been exhausted and the conviction is final.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010139
The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 12 March 2000 to show her home of record (HOR) as San Antonio, Texas. The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 * driver's license information * DA Form 71 (Oath of Office) * Texas dental license * tax documents * real estate purchase agreement/settlement statement CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Correction of the HOR must be based on evidence that a bona fide error...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019992
Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. The findings of guilty were based on the accused's plea of guilty. There is no evidence that he was not afforded due process.