Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016174
Original file (20130016174.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  15 May 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130016174 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show she is authorized the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation.

2.  The applicant states she earned the award and she did not receive it.

3.  The applicant provides DD Forms 214 dated 18 July 1969 and 29 March 1972.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 25 July 1966.  She completed training as an administrative specialist.  She arrived in Vietnam on 10 May 1968 and was assigned to Woman's Army Corps (WAC) Detachment, Special Troops, United States (U.S.) Army Vietnam.

3.  She participated in the following five campaigns:

* Vietnam Counteroffensive, Phase IV Campaign, which extended from 2 April through 30 June 1968
* Vietnam Counteroffensive, Phase V Campaign, which extended from 1 July through 1 November 1968
* Vietnam Counteroffensive, Phase VI Campaign, which extended from 2 November 1968 through 22 February 1969
* Tet 69 Counteroffensive Campaign, which extended from 23 February through 8 June 1969
* Vietnam Summer-Fall 1969, which extended from 9 June through 31 October 1969

4.  On 1 July 1969, General Orders Number 2327 were published awarding the applicant the Army Commendation Medal for meritorious service from May 1968 to July 1969.

5.  On 17 July 1969, the applicant departed Vietnam en-route to the United States.  She was honorably discharged as an overseas returnee on 18 July 1969.  Her DD Form 214 shows the following awards:

* National Defense Service Medal
* Vietnam Service Medal
* Vietnam Campaign Medal

6.  The applicant again enlisted in the Regular Army on 29 August 1969.  She was honorably discharged on 29 March 1972, due to pregnancy.  Her DD Form 214 for this period shows the entry "None" in item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized).

7.  Department of the Army General Orders Number 8, dated 1974, announced   award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation to Headquarters, U.S. Military Assistance Command and its subordinate units during the period 8 February 1962 to 28 March 1973 and to Headquarters, U.S. Army Vietnam and its subordinate units during the period 20 July 1965 to 28 March 1973.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states a bronze service star is worn on the appropriate service ribbon, to include the Vietnam Service Medal, for each credited campaign.  A silver service star is authorized in lieu of five bronze service stars.

9.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) is the authority on the preparation of the DD Form 214.  The regulation in effect at that time states, from the DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record), enter all decorations, service medals, campaign credits, and badges awarded or authorized.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contentions have been noted.

2.  The available evidence does show that the unit to which the applicant was assigned was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation in Department of the Army General Orders Number 8, dated 1974.  This award should be added on her DD Form 214.

3.  She was awarded the Army Commendation Medal in General Orders Number 2327.  This award should be added on her DD Form 214.

4.  The applicant is authorized a silver service star to be affixed to her already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal based on her campaign participation.

5.  In view of the foregoing, her records should be corrected as recommended below.

BOARD VOTE:

____x____  ____x____  ____x____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending both of her DD Forms 214, dated 29 March 1972, to show the following awards:

* National Defense Service Medal
* Vietnam Service Medal with one silver service star
* Vietnam Campaign Medal
* Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation
* The Army Commendation Medal




      _______ _   __x_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130016174



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130016174



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019560

    Original file (20090019560.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the Army Achievement Medal is awarded to any member of the armed forces of the United States, who while serving in a noncombat area on or after 1 August 1981, distinguished themselves by meritorious service or achievement. The FSM’s service record does not show he was recommended for or awarded the Army Achievement Medal. However, the FSM’s service record does not contain any orders or other evidence which shows he was recommended for or awarded the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023197

    Original file (20100023197.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The DD Form 214 he received shows the following awards: * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Service Medal * Vietnam Campaign Medal * Purple Heart 7. The evidence of record shows that the company to which he was assigned was awarded the Valorous Unit Award in Permanent Orders 252-09. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214 to show he is authorized the following awards: * Valorous...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004101793C070208

    Original file (2004101793C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no orders in the applicant's service personnel records to show that he was awarded the Purple Heart. DA Pamphlet 672-3, Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register, dated 29 January 1988, which lists unit awards received by units serving in Vietnam, shows that the unit the applicant was assigned to, Company A, 15th Engineer Battalion, 9th Infantry Division, was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross, with Palm, Unit Citation, for the period 1 July through 13...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001497

    Original file (20140001497.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to add the following awards: * Army Commendation Medal * Good Conduct Medal * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation * Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation * Airborne and Air Assault Commemorative Medals 2. His DD Form 214 should also be corrected to show the following awards: * Valorous Unit Award * Republic of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002799

    Original file (20130002799.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214 to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050005559C070206

    Original file (20050005559C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s military records show that he enlisted in the Regular Army and served on active duty in that status for the period from 18 June 1965 through 15 May 1967. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the National Defense Service Medal is awarded for honorable active service for any period between 27 July 1950 through 27 July 1954, 1 January 1961 through 14 August 1974, 2 August 1990 through 30 November 1995 and 11 September 2001 to a date to be determined. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006368

    Original file (20120006368.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows that General Orders Number 980 were published on 5 February 1969, awarding the applicant the Army Commendation Medal (First Oak Leaf Cluster) with "V" Device. He is also authorized the following awards and correction on his DD Form 214 to show these awards: * Air Medal * Army Good Conduct Medal (First Award) * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation * One silver service star affixed to his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal BOARD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004475

    Original file (20120004475.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    For Vietnam service, one overseas service bar is authorized for each period of 6 months active Federal service as a member of a U.S. Service in Vietnam from 1 July 1958 to 28 March 1973. Army Regulation 635-5 states " all decorations, service medals, campaign credits, and badges awarded or authorized " will be shown on DD Form 214. Therefore, the entry in item 24 of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 3 October 1972 should read the: * Silver Star (2nd Award) * Purple Heart (2nd Award) *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020143

    Original file (20110020143.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time shows his awards as the: * Bronze Star Medal * Army Commendation Medal * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Service Medal * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) * Combat...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088925C070403

    Original file (2003088925C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    No record, of this volunteer convoy, to his knowledge, was ever recorded back in 1968. Based on his service, he is entitled to award of the Good Conduct Medal for the period 2 August 1967 through 6 June 1969 and to have it added to his DD Form 214. That so much of the application as is in excess of the foregoing, that the unit history of the 585th Transport Company include a record and give recognition to eight soldiers who took part in a volunteer convoy in 1968, be denied.