Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015823
Original file (20130015823.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		

		BOARD DATE:	  24 April 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130015823 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) to show his last name as R--i.  

2.  He states his last name contains a typographical error.

3.  He provides copies of his:

* DD Form 214
* Certification of Birth
* Certificate of Baptism

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  The applicant's complete military records are not available for review.  A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members' records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973.  It is believed his records were lost or destroyed in that fire.  

3.  The available evidence shows he enlisted in the Regular Army on 7 April 1952.

4.  The available evidence contains a Standard Form 88 (Report of Medical Examination) which lists his last name as R--a.

5.  On 6 April 1954, he was released from active duty after completing 2 years of active military service.  Item 1 (Name) of the DD Form 214 he was issued shows his last name as R-a.  Item 40 (Signature of Person Being Separated) shows he authenticated his DD Form 214 with the last name R---a.

6.  He submitted a:

	a.  City of New York, Department of Heath, Certification of Birth, dated 
31 March 1932, which shows his last name as R--i; and 

   b.  Certificate of Baptism, dated 12 June 1932, that shows his last name as 	R--i.

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It states, in pertinent part, that the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier’s most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.  The regulation also establishes standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214 and contains preparation instructions in chapter 2.  The instructions for completing item 1 (Name) state to enter the name as it is recorded in the military record.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

1.  While the applicant's desire to change his military record to reflect the requested spelling of his last name is understood, the available evidence shows he entered, served, and was separated from active duty under the spelling of the last name that is listed on his DD Form 214.  


2.  The Army has an interest in maintaining the integrity of its records.  The data and information contained in those records should reflect the conditions and circumstances that existed at the time the records were created.  There appears to be no compelling reason to compromise the integrity of the Army’s records by changing the spelling of his last name at this late date.

3.  This Record of Proceedings will be filed in his military record to provide clarity and to deal with any confusion that may arise regarding the difference in the spelling in the last name he used when he served on active duty and the spelling of the last name he currently uses.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X____  __X_____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________X______________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130015823



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130015823



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059851C070421

    Original file (2001059851C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded: He does not provide the baptismal certificate which evidently changed both his first name and the spelling of his last name.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015448

    Original file (20140015448.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show his last name as "M_____E" instead of "M______N." It states the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014975

    Original file (20080014975.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) to show his correct date of birth (DOB). The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016259

    Original file (20090016259.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests his service records be corrected to show his first name as MIECESLAUS instead of MECESLAUS. Evidence of record shows the applicant enlisted and served using the first name of MECESLAUS throughout his entire period of service. _______ _ _x______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005336

    Original file (20130005336.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of all of his military records to show: * the spelling of his first name as Jxxxx vice Gxxxxx * his date of birth (DOB) as 12 August 19XX vice 10 August 19XX 2. _______ _ _X______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150004288

    Original file (20150004288.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show her last name as "Mxxxxam" instead of "Mxxxxum." All of military service records show her last name spelled as "Mxxxxum." Both forms show her last name as "Mxxxxum."

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022635

    Original file (20110022635.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his last name spelled as "Thigxxx." The evidence of record shows the applicant served under and was discharged under the last name as shown in his records and on his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011619

    Original file (20130011619.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    BOARD DATE: 15 April 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130011619 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant, the spouse of a deceased former server member (FSM), requests correction of item 1 (Last Name – First Name – Middle Name) of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) to show the spelling of his first name as "Darwin."

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017397

    Original file (20110017397.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his military records by changing his middle name from John to Patrick. This regulation has historically stated that item 1 of the DD Form 214 will contain the name taken from the Soldier's personnel record.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022546

    Original file (20110022546.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined...