Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015403
Original file (20130015403.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		
		BOARD DATE:  1 May 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130015403


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of the orders awarding him the Purple Heart to show his social security number (SSN) as XXX-XX-8293.

2.  The applicant states the last two digits of the SSN shown on the orders were transposed.

3.  The applicant provides Headquarters, 3d Brigade, 9th Infantry Division, General Orders Number 26, dated 26 September 1969.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 5 December 1968.  He held military occupational specialty 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman).

3.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in:

	a.  item 38 (Record of Assignments) that he was assigned to Company C, 5th Battalion, 60th Infantry Regiment, 9th Infantry Division, Vietnam, from 30 May 1969 through 18 May 1970; and

	b.  item 38 that his conduct and efficiency ratings were "excellent."

4.  The applicant's DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) shows he was honorably released from active duty on 8 September 1970 in the rank of sergeant (SGT)/E-5.  He completed 1 year, 9 months, and 4 days of active duty service.

5.  Item 3 (Social Security Number) of his DD Form 214 also shows his SSN as XXX-XX-8293.

6.  He provided a copy of his Purple Heart orders showing his SSN as 
XXX-XX-8239.

7.  As a related issue, a review of the applicant's military personnel records reveals he may be authorized an additional award that is not shown on his DD Form 214.

8.  Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for the first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year.  The enlisted person must have had all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings.  Ratings of "unknown" for portions of the period under consideration were not disqualifying.  There must have been no convictions by a court-martial.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence shows the last two digits of his SSN were transposed in his Purple Heart orders.  These orders should be corrected.

2.  The available evidence clearly shows he distinguished himself in the performance of his military service as evidenced by his "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings, honorable release from active duty, and advancement to SGT.  There is no evidence of a commander's disqualification for the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.  It is presumed that his not receiving the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal for his service was an oversight.  Therefore, he should be awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) and his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award.

BOARD VOTE:

___X_____  __X______  _X_ _  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  amending Headquarters, 3d Brigade, 9th Infantry Division, General Orders Number 26, dated 26 September 1969, to show his SSN as shown on his DD Form 214; and

	b.  awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 5 December 1968 to 8 September 1970 and adding the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) to his DD Form 214.



      ___________ X______________
                  CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100025029



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130015403



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008047

    Original file (20090008047.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows that the applicant enlisted and served using his SSN as xxx-xx-6785. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. With respect to the applicant's Combat Infantryman Badge, the evidence of record shows the applicant was assigned to an infantry unit during his service in the Republic of Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011674

    Original file (20130011674.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He provides a certificate, dated 11 August 1969, showing he was awarded the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 10 August 1969 in Vietnam. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * awarding him the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020517

    Original file (20120020517.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DD Form 398 (Statement of Personal History), dated 12 January 1968, shows his SSN as "XXX-XX-2871." There is no evidence to show the applicant received the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 15 January 1968 through 15 January 1970; b. amending the SSN entered on his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005775

    Original file (20130005775.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his complete social security number (SSN) and award of the Purple Heart. His DA Form 20 shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal and the records show he participated in two campaigns during his service in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120013103

    Original file (20120013103.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). He should be awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) based on his "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings for the period 26 January 1968 through 25 January 1971. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 26 January 1968 through 25 January...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023304

    Original file (20110023304.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his social security number (SSN) as listed in his award orders and correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to add all earned awards. The evidence of record confirms the applicant enlisted, served, and was released from active duty under the SSN XXX-XX-5XXX. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. amending the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010181

    Original file (20110010181.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states a bronze service star will be awarded for wear on the Vietnam Service Medal for participation in each credited campaign. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. correcting item 3 of his DD Form 214 to reflect his social security number as shown on his social security...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010411

    Original file (20100010411.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Although the letter awarding the applicant the Purple Heart contained an incorrect ASN, the Western Union telegram and the message released by the Commanding General, U.S. Army Vietnam, both identified the applicant with the correct ASN, thereby verifying the applicant was wounded and awarded the Purple Heart. The applicant's military personnel records show he participated in one campaign during his service in Vietnam. The Board also recommends that his DD Form 214 be corrected by: a....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072741C070403

    Original file (2002072741C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of the applicant's DA Form 20 shows he was awarded the Purple Heart by General Orders (GO) 75, Headquarters, 9th Infantry Division and the Purple Heart First Oak Leaf Cluster by GO 76, Headquarters, 9th Infantry Division. The applicant's DA Form 20, item 41 shows he was awarded the CIB by Special Orders 205, Headquarters, 9th Infantry Division (the date is not given). That the applicant's DD Form 214 be amended to show he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005686

    Original file (20110005686.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The evidence of record shows the applicant's SSN as "XXX-XX-XXX0" at the time of his induction. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 14 February 1968 through 17 September 1969; b. deleting the entry "XXX-XX-XXX9" from item 3 of his DD Form...