Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015377
Original file (20130015377.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		
		BOARD DATE:	  17 April 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130015377 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).

2.  The applicant states he was never awarded the CIB and it is his understanding that he should have been in receipt of the award.

3.  The applicant provides:

* National Personnel Record Center Letter, dated 25 July 2013
* DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), dated 23 February 1971
* DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record)
* Acknowledgement of Service Obligation
* DD Form 47 (Record of Induction)
* Letter Orders Number 01-1015523, dated 24 January 1979
* DA Form 2627 (Record of Appellate or Other Supplementary Actions Under Article 15, UCMJ), 3 December 1970

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army on 23 February 1971.  He completed training as a light weapons infantryman.  He arrived in Vietnam on 27 July 1969 and he was assigned to Company A, 3rd Battalion, 8th Infantry, 4th Infantry Division.

3.  A review of the available records fails to show that the applicant ever engaged in active ground combat while he was in Vietnam.

4.  On 26 July 1970, the applicant departed Vietnam en-route to the U.S.  He was honorably released from active duty on 23 February 1971, at the expiration of his term of service.  He completed 2 years of total active service.

5.  His DD Form 214 shows the following awards:

* National Defense Service Medal
* Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars
* Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960)

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the CIB is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry military occupational specialty (MOS).  They must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contentions have been noted.  His supporting evidence has been considered.

2.  Although the applicant held an infantry MOS and was assigned to an infantry unit, there is no evidence in the available record showing he engaged in active ground combat while he was in Vietnam.

3.  According to the applicable regulation, to be awarded the CIB a Soldier must have served in active ground combat while he was in the Army.  He has submitted insufficient evidence to show he meets the criteria to be awarded the CIB.

4.  In view of the foregoing, his request should be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X_____  __X______  _X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _ X  _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130015377





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130015377



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021090

    Original file (20120021090.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 11 April 1971 to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). By regulation, in order to support award of the CIB, there must not only be evidence that a member served in an infantry MOS while assigned to an infantry unit, but the individual must have been present and participated with the unit while it was engaged in active ground combat with...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018280

    Original file (20110018280.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 38 (Record of Assignments) shows he received “excellent” conduct and efficiency ratings at all of his active duty assignments. Although the applicant's record is void of specific evidence of his personal participation in active ground combat with his unit in the RVN, it does confirm he served as an infantryman in MOS 11B with a qualifying infantry unit during his tour of duty in the RVN. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024164

    Original file (20110024164 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he was awarded the Purple Heart (PH) for wounds received in action on 27 April 1971, in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN), and was not awarded the CIB. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) shows during his tenure with 1st Battalion, 506th Infantry, this unit was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation for service from 1 March 1971 to 9 October 1971 based on Department of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001565

    Original file (20120001565.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the CIB for the period 9 March 1970 through 1 February 1971; and b. adding the CIB to his DD Form 214 for the period ending 11 March 1975. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120001565 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000804

    Original file (20150000804.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His service record does not contain orders showing he was awarded the CIB. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the CIB is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS. The evidence of record shows the applicant completed infantry training and he was awarded MOS 1542.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080004261

    Original file (20080004261.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 3 years on 19 June 1970. The applicant’s records show that he served in the Republic of Vietnam from 5 June 1971 to 28 March 1972. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018777

    Original file (20130018777.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 214 does not show the CIB as an authorized award. The evidence shows the applicant held and served in an infantry MOS while assigned to an infantry company during his assignment in Vietnam. _______ _ _X______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011315

    Original file (20070011315.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no General Orders in the applicant's records that show he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge. Evidence of record shows that the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected to show award of the Good Conduct Medal for the period 6 March 1969 through 5 March 1971, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, the Republic of Vietnam Civil...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011168

    Original file (20080011168.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 3 September 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080011168 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. In his undated statement, a member of the applicant’s unit states that he served with the applicant in the Republic of Vietnam in 1970 and that they were assigned to the 199th Infantry Brigade. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004997

    Original file (20090004997.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This medal is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973. By regulation, in order to support award of the CIB, there must not only be evidence that a member served in an infantry military occupational specialty in an infantry unit, but also that he was personally present and participated with the qualifying infantry unit while it was engaged in active ground combat with enemy forces. As a result,...