Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015292
Original file (20130015292.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF 

		BOARD DATE:	  1 May 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130015292 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests the following corrections of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), ending on 16 September 1980:

* Item 18 (Remarks) – to show Title 10 service
* Item 24 (Character of Service) – to show his character of service

2.  The applicant states his 1980 DD Form 214 is missing information.  The errors were found by the State Veterans Affairs Board.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his 1980 DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  The applicant enlisted in the Mississippi Army National Guard (MSARNG) on 21 July 1974.  He entered active duty for training (ADT) on 23 January 1975.  He completed advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty 64C (motor transport operator).

3.  He was honorably released from active duty on 22 May 1975 and reverted to the MSARNG.  His record contains the following:

   a.  Orders 22-11, issued by The Adjutant General's (TAG) Office, MS, dated 31 January 1979, honorably discharged him from the ARNG with an effective date of 9 March 1979.

   b.  National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) which shows he was honorably released from the MSARNG, in pay grade E-2, on 9 March 1979 and was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR).  The NGB Form 22 lists in:

* Item 8b (Authority and Reason) – "Orders 22-11 TAGO-MS, dated 31 January 1979, Involuntary Active Duty, paragraph 7-10e, National Guard Regulation 600-200 and Army Regulation 135-91 (Army National Guard and Army Reserve Service Obligations, Methods of Fulfillment, Participation Requirements, and Enforcement Procedures)
* Item 19 (Remarks) – To Active Duty, enlisted member has 1 year, 6 months, and 21 days left on service obligation

   c.  NGB Form 22-1 (Request/Decline Copy of NGB Form 22, Narrative Reason for Separation), dated 9 March 1979, which stated he was separated for failure to meet scheduled drills.

4.  He entered active duty 10 March 1979.  He was promoted to pay grade E-4 on 1 March 1980.  His record also contains Orders 178-3, issued by the U.S. Army Transportation Center and Fort Eustis, VA, dated 11 September 1980, releasing him from active duty on 16 September 1980.  The orders show his expiration of term of service (ETS) date was 16 September 1980.

5.  He was released from active duty on 16 September 1980 and was transferred to the USAR.  His DD Form 214 lists in:

* Item 18 - no authority for this entry on active duty
* Item 24 - "blank"
* Item 25 (Separation Authority) - Chapter 2, Army Regulation      635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Separations)
* Item 26 (Separation Code) – LBK
* Item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) - Completion of required service (ETS)

6.  He was released from the USAR on 5 December 1980 and was transferred to the MSARNG for the purpose of enlistment.  He enlisted in the MSARNG on 6 December 1980.  He was honorably discharged from the MSARNG on 
24 August 1981.

7.  Army Regulation 135-91, in effect at the time, set the policies governing the various types of service obligations and participation requirements.  The regulation stated Reserve Components members with statutory service obligations whose participation was unsatisfactory could be ordered to active duty for 24 months, less any period of active duty or active duty for training previously performed.  

8.  Army Regulation 635-200, then in effect, set forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 2 established policy and prescribed procedures for separating personnel who had completed the period of service for which enlisted, inducted, or ordered to active duty.  The separation authority could direct a general discharge if such a discharge was merited by the Soldier's overall record.

9.  Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7a, stated an honorable discharge was a separation with honor and entitled the recipient to benefits provided by law.  The honorable characterization was appropriate when the quality of the member’s service generally had met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel, or was otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate.  

10.  When serving under Title 10, "active duty" means full-time duty in the active military service of the United States.  Title 10 allows the President to "federalize" National Guard forces by ordering them to active duty in their reserve component status or by calling them into Federal service in their militia status.  This does not include being involuntarily ordered to active duty for members with a statutory service obligation.

11.  When serving under Title 32 Active Duty, Title 32 service is primarily state active duty. 


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  With respect to item 18 of his 1980 DD Form 214, the evidence shows the applicant was discharged from the MSARNG on 9 March 1979 for failure to meet scheduled drills and was involuntarily ordered to active duty for completion of his service obligation.  He was not ordered to active duty under Title 10 or 32 of the U.S. Code; therefore, item 18 would not list this information.  In view of the foregoing, he is not entitled to the requested relief.

2.  With respect to item 24 of his 1980 DD Form 214, the evidence shows that during his period of active duty from March 1979 to September 1980 he was promoted to pay grade E-4 and he completed the required period of service.  There is no evidence his service was less than honorable during this period of active duty.  It appears his period of service was honorable.  Therefore, he is entitled to correction of item 24 of his 1980 DD Form 214 to list the entry, "Honorable."

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

___X____  ___X___  ___X____  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding to item 24 of his DD Form 214 ending on 16 September 1980 the entry, "Honorable."

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to correction of item 18 of his 

1980 DD Form 214 to show he was ordered to active duty under Title 10 or 32 of the U.S. Code.



      _______ _  X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130015292





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130015292



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012041

    Original file (20110012041.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    An NGB Form 600-7-6-R-E (Annex X to DD Form 4, PSEB Addendum - ARNGUS) (Revised 10 August 2007) shows the applicant acknowledged he was not qualified in the primary MOS for which he was enlisting, he enlisted into a Modified Table of Organization and Equipment (MTOE) unit in critical skill [MOS] 21B, and agreed to attend formal training and become qualified in his contracted MOS within 24 months of the date of enlistment. They must: enlist for at least 3 years; enlist in an MTOE unit; be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004102698C070208

    Original file (2004102698C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    NGB further stated that the applicant was discharged from the Army on 18 October 1977 and that, on 5 October 1977, he received appointment as a Reserve commissioned officer with an effective date of 19 October 1977. The NGB opinion stated that the applicant completed an application for Federal Recognition on 11 November 1979 and that he indicated that he was in the USAR from 18 October 1977 until the "present." The applicant's service personnel records contain a Department of the Army,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004089

    Original file (20140004089.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * he held the rank/grade of SFC/E-7 when he was discharged from active duty * he enlisted in the Mississippi Army National Guard (MSARNG) approximately 2 years later in the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 because there were no E-7 positions available * he was promoted to the rank/grade of SSG/E-6 in the MSARNG * he was always told he would retire in the highest rank successfully held * he retired on 24 December 2013 and his retirement orders show his rank/grade as...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019382

    Original file (20080019382.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Item 12b (Separation Date This Period) contains the entry 1997 08 13 (1997 August 13). The only documents in his military personnel records jacket that these dates would refer to are his DD Form 214 and his NGB Form 22.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050011736

    Original file (20050011736.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's spouse provides, on behalf of the applicant, a general power of attorney; a DD Form 2839 (Career Status Bonus (CSB) Election); a Request for Personnel Action; an email dated 1 June 2004; an NGB Form 22-5- 4-E (Addendum to DD Form 4) dated 6 June 2004; release from active duty orders dated 11 June 2004; reassignment orders dated 23 March 2001; the applicant's DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record); the applicant's DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020938

    Original file (20130020938.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides copies of the following: * Orders Number 052-053 * Orders Number 052-053 (Corrected Copy) * National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) * Honorable Discharge Certificate * letter from the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) * his letter to the Army Grade Determination Review Board (AGDRB) and their response CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. On 19 June 2010, he was placed on the retired list in the rank/pay grade of SSG/E-6. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029921

    Original file (20100029921.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In effect, he requests to be advanced on the retired list to the highest grade held. Therefore, the applicant’s records should be corrected to show he was placed on the retired list in the rank/grade of SSG/E-6, effective 25 November 2010, the date he turned 60 and became eligible to receive retired pay. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. amending Orders P10-929149, dated 29 October 2010, to show he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015924

    Original file (20130015924.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to correct his name, social security number, dates of enlistment and discharge, date of birth (DOB), and place of birth. The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 31 July 1972. While the applicant's desire to change his military records is understood, all of the documents in the applicant's record show he used the following when he enlisted and when he served in an active duty...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040003944C070208

    Original file (20040003944C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 135-175 states, in pertinent part, that officers in the grade of first lieutenant, captain, or major, who completed their statutory military obligation, will be discharged for failure to be selected for promotion after the second consideration by a Department of the Army Reserve Components Selection Board. He requests that the Secretary of the Army convene a special board to determine that he is entitled to be restored to active duty or to an active status in a Reserve...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003640

    Original file (20150003640.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he is entitled to a non-prior service enlistment bonus (NPSEB) of $10,000. Upon his enlistment in the ARNG on 11 March 2009, he was offered an enlistment bonus of $10,000. The NPSEB Addendum was signed by the applicant and dated 11 March 2009.