Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015234
Original file (20130015234 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  29 April 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130015234 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests inclusion of his service in military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (Light Weapon Infantryman) on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge).

2.  The applicant states it appears that his period of service in MOS 11B was overlooked at the time of his return from Vietnam.  He is proud of his service as an infantryman and would like to have that service recognized.

3.  The applicant provides copies of transfer orders and his 14 August 1970 DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted on 15 August 1968, completed training, and was awarded MOS 11B.

3.  He was honorably released from active duty on 14 August 1970 as a specialist five (E-5).  The DD Form 214 issued at that time shows an MOS of 62M (Loader Operator) and lists his awards as the National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), Army Commendation Medal, and the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar.

4.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) for this period shows he was awarded:

* primary MOS 11B on 20 December 1968
* secondary MOS 12A (Pioneer) on 25 March 1969
* MOS 12B (Combat Engineer) on 23 May 1969
* primary MOS 62M on 26 December 1969
* 11B changed from a primary to an additional MOS

5.  The applicant enlisted in the Army National Guard on 6 February 1982 and served in an active status until 5 February 1992.  Included in this time is a period of active duty in support of Operation Desert Shield/Desert Storm, 20 September 1990 to 16 May 1991.

6.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents that must be prepared for Soldiers on retirement, discharge, release from active duty service, or control of the Active Army.  It establishes standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  As in effect at the time of the applicant's 1970 separation, the entry at block 23a (Specialty Number and Title) would be the primary MOS held at the time of separation.  
   
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The provision to include all MOS's served in during the period covered by a given DD Form 214 did not come into effect until well after the issuance of the applicant's first DD Form 214.  Therefore, the 1970 DD Form 214 was properly completed and no correction is warranted.

2.  This action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to our Nation.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.  


BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ____x___  ____x ___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
      
      
      
      
      _______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130015234





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130015234



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007803

    Original file (20100007803.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no records to show the applicant was awarded MOS 11B or any other infantry MOS. Additionally, appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 provides that during the Vietnam era the Combat Infantryman Badge was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H. Concerning award of the Combat Infantryman Badge, the evidence of record shows the applicant held MOS 62E and 62A.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019347

    Original file (20100019347.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of his DA Form 20 does not show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. The evidence of record shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal and that he participated in five campaigns during his service in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Army Commendation Medal and the Vietnam Service Medal; and b. adding to item 24...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023239

    Original file (20110023239.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    When he completed the training, he was assigned to an infantry unit and performed duties as an 11B from December 1968 to June 1969. There are three requirements for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge: the Soldier must be an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties, he must be assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat, and he must actively participate in such ground combat. However, the evidence of record shows the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003022

    Original file (20110003022.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the following: * Bronze Star Medal (BSM) * Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) * Combat Engineer Badge [correctly known as the Sapper Tab] * Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation * Any additional awards and decorations to which he is entitled 2. A review of his personnel service records failed to show evidence and he did not provide...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009693

    Original file (20080009693.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military personnel record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army on 10 October 1968 for a period of 3 years. The Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (formerly known as the Total Army Personnel Command) has advised, in similar cases, that during the Vietnam era the Combat Infantryman Badge was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11F, 11G, or 11H. In the absence of evidence, which shows the applicant was awarded the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010877

    Original file (20130010877.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military records show: a. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity during the period 13 June 1968...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015293

    Original file (20110015293.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. Although the applicant's record shows he was awarded 11B as a secondary MOS and performed the duties of an 11B while serving in the Republic of Vietnam, his record is void of any evidence and he has not provided any evidence showing he was awarded 11B as his primary MOS at any time. As a result, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060001091C070205

    Original file (20060001091C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant adds that he was also awarded the Army Commendation Medal while serving in an infantry unit in Vietnam from February 1969 to July 1969. To be entitled to award of the Combat Infantryman Badge, the evidence must show that an applicant held and served in an infantry MOS while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size, and must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to this infantry unit. As a result, the Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012546

    Original file (20100012546.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart (PH) and two Bronze Star Medals (BSM) he received during his service in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN). Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards and Decorations), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003803C070206

    Original file (20050003803C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB), Bronze Star Service Medal (BSM) and the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM). Therefore, the applicant is entitled to correction of his records to show these awards. Evidence of record shows that the applicant’s primary MOS was 11B when he was inducted in the Army in February 1968.