Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015129
Original file (20130015129.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	    1 May 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130015129 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.

2.  The applicant states his military record shows he is not entitled to the Army Good Conduct Medal; however, he does not know the reason.  He has always wanted to be awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal.  He is now in a nursing home and he has dementia, but he remembers the medal.

3.  The applicant provides no additional evidence.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 30 December 1961 and he held military occupational specialty 122.60 (bridge specialist).  

3.  He was honorably released from active duty, in pay grade E-5 (temporary (T)) on 17 December 1964 and he was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve.  He was credited with completing 2 years, 11 months, and 18 days of net active service with no time lost.  His DD Form 214 lists the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle and Carbine Bars and Mechanics Badge.

4.  His DA Form 24 (Service Record) shows in:

* Section 4 (Chronological Record of Military Service) – he received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his period of service, there is no evidence of a commander's disqualification for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal during his period of service
* Section 10 – he was fully qualified for reenlistment 

5.  Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for the first award only, 1 year service entirely during the period 7 December 1941 through 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years, but more than 1 year.  The enlisted person must have had all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings.  There must have been no convictions by a court-marital.

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the National Defense Service Medal is awarded for honorable active service for any period between 27 June 1950 and 27 July 1954, both dates inclusive; between 1 January 1961 and 14 August 1974, both dates inclusive; between 2 August 1990 and 30 November 1995; and from 11 September 2001 to a date to be determined. 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of records shows the applicant received "excellent" conduct and efficiency rating during his period of active duty, attained the rank of pay grade
E-5 (T), and was found fully qualified for reenlistment.  Therefore, it appears he is entitled to award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for his period of service from 30 December 1961 through 17 December 1964 and its addition to his DD Form 214.

2.  He also completed a qualifying period of service for award of the National Defense Service Medal.  Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award.

BOARD VOTE:

____X____  ___X_____  ____X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

* Awarding the applicant the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for his period of service from 30 December 1961 through 17 December 1964
* Adding to his DD Form 214 the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) and National Defense Service Medal



      _______ _   __X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130015129



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130015129



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020133

    Original file (20100020133.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant contends his records should be corrected to show award of the Army Good Conduct Medal, the National Defense Service Medal, and the Presidential Unit Citation. Based on the applicant's "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings, and the absence of evidence showing disqualification, his completion of a qualifying period of service from 29 July 1961 to 27 July 1964 he appears eligible for the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014310

    Original file (20140014310.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM), National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), and Army Overseas Service Ribbon (OSR). Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the NDSM is awarded for honorable active service for any period between 27 July 1950 and 27 July 1954, 1 January 1961 and 14 August 1974, 2 August 1990 and 30 November 1995, and 11 September 2001 and a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080001180

    Original file (20080001180.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Lacking any derogatory information on file that would have disqualified him, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) based on completion of qualifying service ending with the termination of a period of Federal military service and to correct his records to show this award. The evidence of record shows that the applicant served a qualifying period for award of the National Defense Service Medal; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001465

    Original file (20090001465.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Section 4 (Chronological Record of Military Service) of the applicant's DA Form 24 (Service Record) shows he received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his military service. Furthermore, his records do not show any derogatory information throughout his military service. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015154

    Original file (20100015154.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 29 (Foreign Service) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in Korea from 15 July 1963 to 4 August 1964. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal for his period of qualifying honorable active service from 2 October 1961 to 4 August 1964 and to correct his DD Form 214 accordingly. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005360

    Original file (20120005360.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states: a. the Korea Defense Service Medal is authorized for award to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who served on active duty in support of the defense of the Republic of Korea. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021001

    Original file (20100021001.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Section 4 (Chronological Record of Military Service) of his DA Form 24 (Service Record) shows he received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his military service. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946;...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005434

    Original file (20120005434.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to award him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 27 May 1964 through 21 May 1966 and to correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. Based on his service in Vietnam from 17 August 1965 through 19 May 1966, he is authorized the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) and correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026336

    Original file (20100026336.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20090004554 on 28 July 2009. The applicant served during a qualifying period for award of the NDSM. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * awarding him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 21 July 1961...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014448

    Original file (20130014448.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He had served 2 years, 11 months, and 23 days of active service and his DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows he was awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal for his service in Vietnam. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) was awarded by the Government of Vietnam to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961 through 28 March 1973....