Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014285
Original file (20130014285.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  13 May 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130014285 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to add the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation.

2.  The applicant states her service in Vietnam qualifies her for this award and she would like it added to her DD Form 214.

3.  The applicant provides her DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular on 6 October 1967 and held military occupational specialty 71L (Administrative Specialist).  The highest rank/grade she attained while serving on active duty was staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6.

3.  Her DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows she was assigned in Vietnam from 20 October 1968 to 19 October 1969 and served with the Adjutant General Company, United States Army Vietnam (USARV) from 20 October 1968 to 17 October 1969. 

4.  General Orders (GO) Number 3658, issued by Headquarters, USARV, on 
26 September 1969 awarded her the Army Commendation Medal for service from October 1968 to October 1969.

5.  She was honorably discharged from active duty on 16 January 1970.  Her 
DD Form 214 shows she completed 1 year, 5 months, and 22 days of net active service during the period under review, of which 1 year was credited as foreign service.  Her DD Form 214 also shows she was awarded or authorized the:

* National Defense Service Medal
* Vietnam Service Medal
* Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960)
* One overseas service bar

6.  Department of the Army (DA) Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the awards received by units serving in Vietnam.  This pamphlet shows Headquarters, USARV and its subordinate units  were cited for award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation for the period 20 July 1965 to 28 March 1973 by DAGO Order Number 8, dated 1974.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards), paragraph 2-13, contains the regulatory guidance on the Vietnam Service Medal.  It states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each Vietnam campaign for which a member receives participation credit.  Appendix B shows that during her service in Vietnam, the applicant participated in the following four campaigns:

* Vietnam Counteroffensive, Phase V (1 July 1968 - 1 November 1968)
* Vietnam Counteroffensive, Phase VI (2 November 1968 - 22 February 1969)
* TET 69 Counteroffensive (23 February 1969 - 8 June 1969)
* Vietnam Summer-Fall 1969 (9 June 1969 - 31 October 1969)

8.  A review of her service records shows she had “excellent” conduct and efficiency ratings, no derogatory information in the form of time lost, nonjudicial punishment, or suspension of favorable personnel actions, or a commander's disqualification that would have precluded her from being recommended for and awarded the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 
6 October 1967 through 16 January 1970.

9.  Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service.  This period was 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ended with the termination of a period of Federal military service.  The enlisted person must have had all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings and no convictions by a court-martial.

10.  Army Regulation 670-1 (Wear and Appearance of the Military Uniform) states one overseas service bar is authorized for each 6-month period active Federal service as a member of a U.S. Service in Vietnam, from 1 July 1958 to 28 March 1973.  The months of arrival to, and departure from Vietnam are counted as whole months for credit toward the overseas service bar. 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  GO awarded her the Army Commendation Medal; therefore, she is entitled to correction of her DD Form 214 to add this award.

2.  Her unit in Vietnam was cited for award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation; therefore, she is entitled to correction of her 
DD Form 214 to add this unit award.

3.  The evidence of record shows she participated in four campaigns while serving in Vietnam; therefore, she is entitled to correction of her DD Form 214 to show four bronze service stars affixed to her previously-awarded Vietnam Service Medal.

4.  She served honorably during the period 6 October 1967 through 16 January 1970.  There is no derogatory information in the form of nonjudicial punishment or suspension of favorable personnel actions that would disqualify her for the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.  Additionally, there are no entries in her record to indicate that her commander denied her this award and she received “excellent” conduct and efficiency ratings.  It appears she met the criteria for this award.  Therefore, she is entitled to award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) and correction of her DD Form 214 to add this award.

5.  The evidence of record shows she served in Vietnam for 1 year; however, her DD Form 214 only shows one overseas service bar.  Army regulation states Soldiers are entitled to one overseas service bar for each 6-month period active Federal service as a member of a U.S. Service in Vietnam, from 1 July 1958 to 28 March 1973.  Therefore, she is entitled to correction of her DD Form 214 to show two overseas service bars.

BOARD VOTE:

____X____  ____X____  ____X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

* awarding her the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 
6 October 19678 through 16 January 1970
* deleting from her DD Form 214 for the period ending 16 January 1970 the Vietnam Service Medal and one overseas service bar
* adding to her DD Form 214 for the period ending 16 January 1970 the:

* Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award)
* Army Commendation Medal
* Vietnam Service Medal with four bronze service stars
* Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation
* Two overseas service bars



      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130014285





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130014285



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000134

    Original file (20150000134.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    While in Germany, he was honorably discharged on 1 November 1967 for the purpose of immediate enlistment in the Regular Army. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states: a. He served a qualifying period for award of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) and his DD Form 214 for the period ending 22 May 1969 should be corrected to show this award.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006357

    Original file (20120006357.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214 shows in: a. item 22c (Foreign and/or Sea Service) - he completed 2 years, 2 months, and 14 days of foreign service, with an entry to see item 30 (Remarks) b. item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized): * Army Commendation Medal * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Service Medal * Vietnam Campaign Medal * 3 overseas service bars * Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14 and M-16) c....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001209

    Original file (20120001209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. For Vietnam service, one overseas service bar was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004173

    Original file (20130004173.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence in his Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR) showing he was recommended for or awarded the Air Medal. Therefore, the preponderance of the evidence shows the applicant is entitled to the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) based on completion of qualifying service from 17 July 1968 to 16 July 1970 ending with termination of a period of Federal military service. Deleting the following awards from his DD Form 214: * Vietnam Service Medal with 2 bronze service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028388

    Original file (20100028388.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's records do not contain orders awarding him more than one Air Medal. There is no evidence the applicant was awarded more than one Air Medal; adding OLC's (or numerals) to his already-awarded Air Medal; therefore, there is insufficient evidence to grant this relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding the following to his DD Form 214 with an effective date of 1 October 1971: * Parachutist...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023600

    Original file (20110023600.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 * DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) * Extract of Department of the Army (DA) Pamphlet 672-3 ((Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) * General Orders (GO) 1888 showing award of the Bronze Star Medal (1st OLC) with "V" Device * GO Number 3771 showing award of the Army Commendation Medal (1st OLC) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show these unit awards. As a result, the...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050008688

    Original file (20050008688.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    AR 672-5-1, in effect at the time of the applicant's separation provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. Despite the above evidence, there is no conclusive evidence his primary duty was to accompany infantry Soldiers on tactical operations and that he served in active ground combat while assigned to his infantry unit. As a result, the Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026114

    Original file (20100026114.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of this DD Form 214 shows the entry "N/A." However, it appears he is referring to his DD Form 214 for the period ending 15 October 1968 (which covers the period 10 October 1968 through 15 October 1968) because his DD Form 214 for the period ending 15 July 1971 shows: * he enlisted in the RA on 16 October 1968 * he was released from active duty on 15 July 1971 * he was awarded the NDSM,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009829

    Original file (20140009829.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected by adding the: * Vietnam Service Medal * Vietnam Campaign Medal * any other awards and/or decorations he may have earned while on active duty 2. Neither his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) nor his DD Form 214 reflect any service in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000981

    Original file (20150000981.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * Headquarters, U.S. Army Medical Command, Vietnam (Provisional), General Orders Number 805, dated 2 May 1970 * U.S. Army Vietnam (USARV) Form 157-R (Recommendation for Decoration for Valor or Merit) * DD Form 214 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) currently prescribes Army policy, criteria, and administrative instructions concerning individual and unit military awards and states: a. a bronze service star is authorized with the...