Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014272
Original file (20130014272.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  3 April 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130014272 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests approval to transfer his education benefits to his dependent under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill.

2.  The applicant states he was not informed about the TEB option during his last year of active duty, or at the time of retirement.  His retirement was approved and he out-processed in July 2009 on terminal leave.  His date of retirement was 
1 December 2009.  He wants to know what he must do to allow his dependent to use this benefit.

3.  The applicant provides no additional documentation.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  Orders 035-0163, Fort Hood, TX, dated 4 February 2009, announced the applicant's release from active duty with an effective date of 30 November 2009.

3.  After completing over 20 years and 2 days of active duty service, the applicant retired from the Army on 30 November 2009.

4.  The Post-9/11 Veterans Educational Assistance Act of 2008 is described under Title V of the Supplemental Appropriations Act of 2008, Public Law
110-252, House of Representatives, 2642.  In July 2008, Congress passed a law for the Post-9/11 GI Bill which went into effect on 1 August 2009.

5.  Public Law 110-252, section 3319, provides the eligibility requirements necessary to transfer unused education benefits to family members.  A service member may execute TEB only while serving as a member of the Armed Forces.  The VA is responsible for final determination of eligibility for educational benefits under this program.  General eligibility criteria provides that service members must have served on active duty in the Regular Army or as a Reserve member ordered to active duty under Title 10, U.S. Code, sections 688, 12301(a), 12301(d), 12301(g), 12302, or 12304 (orders in support of contingency operations, i.e., mobilization), and must have received an honorable discharge at the conclusion of active service.

6.  The program guidance stipulates that a service member who has completed 20 years of active Federal service as computed under Title 10, U.S. Code, section 12732 and becomes retirement eligible during the period 1 August 2009 through 1 August 2013 is entitled to transfer benefits to his/her dependents.  Service members who have an approved retirement date after 1 August 2009 and before 1 July 2010 do not incur any additional service requirement to be eligible for the TEB.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant requests approval to transfer his education benefits to his dependent under the TEB provisions of the Post-9/11 GI Bill.

2.  The applicant had 20 years of service upon retirement.  He did not incur an additional service requirement and there is no evidence of any adverse action that would have made him ineligible for the TEB.  Therefore, he would have been eligible to transfer the benefit to either his spouse or children if he had requested to do so before leaving the service.



3.  During the initial implementation of this program, many Soldiers at all grades were confused regarding their eligibility and/or the procedure to apply for such benefit.  This confusion was exacerbated with heavy use of the DOD website and the lack of proper log-in credentials for those who may have signed out on transition leave within 90 days of the program implementation.  Similarly, officials at some education centers may have also been confused regarding the implementation instructions and may not have conducted proper counseling.

4.  His retirement date was 30 November 2009.  His orders were published in February 2009.  He contends that he had signed out on terminal leave in July 2009.  It is reasonable to presume that had he been aware of the procedure to transfer his benefits while in an active duty status he would have done so.  Therefore, as a matter of equity, his records should be corrected to show he did so in a timely manner prior to his effective date of retirement.

BOARD VOTE:

____X___  ____X___  ___X__ _  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the applicant filed his application and the Army approved his request to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependent(s) prior to retirement, provided all other program eligibility criteria are met.




      _______ _  X ______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130014272



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130014272



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020558

    Original file (20110020558.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Public Law 110-252, section 3319, provides the eligibility requirements necessary to transfer unused education benefits to family members. The applicant had over 22 years of service upon retirement, no additional service requirement, no evidence of any adverse action, and he would have been eligible to transfer educational benefits to either his spouse or children if he had transferred it before he left the service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021977

    Original file (20120021977.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he transferred his educational benefits to his family members under the Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. The applicant had completed more than 20 years of active service at the time of retirement; therefore, he had no additional service requirement and he would have been eligible to transfer his educational benefits to his eligible family members if he had done so before he left the service. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000396

    Original file (20140000396.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests approval of Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) under the Post-9/11 GI Bill to his dependents. The applicant had over 20 years of service upon his retirement, no additional service requirement, no evidence of any adverse action, and he would have been eligible to transfer the benefit to either his spouse or children if he had transferred it before he left the service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008405

    Original file (20120008405.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Service members who have an approved retirement date after 1 August 2009 and before 1 July 2010 – no additional service required. The applicant had over 28 years of service upon retirement, no additional service requirement, no evidence of any adverse action, and he would have been eligible to transfer the benefit to his eligible family members if he had transferred it before he left the service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009442

    Original file (20110009442.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The advisory official acknowledged that many Soldiers who left service during the first 90 days of the program were not fully aware of the requirement to transfer benefits prior to leaving active service. The applicant departed active service on 31 August 2009 which was within 90 days of the 1 August 2009 implementation. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the applicant filed his application and the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019081

    Original file (20110019081.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show he was authorized to transfer his educational benefits (TEB) under the Post-9/11 GI Bill to his eligible dependents. Therefore, he would have been eligible to transfer his educational benefits while still on active duty. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the applicant filed his application both timely and accurately and that the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120012592

    Original file (20120012592.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he applied to transfer his education benefits to his dependents under the Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill prior to leaving the military. The evidence of record confirms the applicant was on transition leave within 90 days of implementation of the program. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006769

    Original file (20120006769.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This official recommended granting the applicant administrative relief because the Post-9/11 GI Bill was implemented on 1 August 2009 and he was separated from active duty within 90 days of the program being implemented. The applicant had more than 20 years of service upon retirement, no additional service requirement, no evidence of any adverse action, and he would have been eligible to transfer the benefit to either his spouse or child if he had transferred the benefit before he left the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011004

    Original file (20120011004.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show he was eligible to transfer his educational benefits (TEB) under the Post-9/11 GI Bill to his daughter. Public Law 110-252, section 3319, provides the eligibility requirements necessary to transfer unused education benefits to family members. Service members must have served on active duty in the Regular Army or as a Reserve member ordered to active duty under Title 10, U.S. Code, sections 688, 12301(a), 12301(d), 12301(g),...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012523

    Original file (20110012523.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A Soldier must be currently on active duty or a member of the Selected Reserves at the time of TEB to his/her dependent (on or after 1 August 2009). The applicant had over 24 years of service upon retirement, no additional service requirement, no evidence of any adverse action, and he would have been eligible to transfer the benefit to either his spouse or children if he had transferred it before he left the service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records...