Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014233
Original file (20130014233.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  29 April 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130014233 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show in item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) the entry "Combat-Related."

2.  The applicant states that his DD Form 214 should have been prepared to show that his injuries were combat-related because all of his injuries were sustained while deployed to Iraq and he was medically evacuated from Iraq and was in the Wounded Warrior Program at Fort Hood, Texas for over 3 years.

3.  The applicant provides no additional documents with his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant was serving in the Texas Army National Guard (TXARNG) in the rank of sergeant when he was ordered to active duty on 28 August 2008.  He deployed to Iraq/Kuwait during the period 20081115 – 20090815.  He was promoted to the pay grade of E-6 on 8 February 2012.

2.  On 20 April 2012, a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) determined that the applicant had the following unfitting conditions: 

* Lumbar Fusion Degenerative Arthritis of cervical spine 
* Left Lower Extremity Radiculopathy persistent following lumbar fusion 


3.  The DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings) noted that the onset of his back condition occurred while training in preparation for deployment, to include an injury sustained during combatives.  

4.  The PEB recommended that the applicant be retired by reason of permanent disability with a 30 percent service-connected disability rating.  The applicant concurred with the findings and recommendations of the PEB and waived a formal hearing of his case.  The DA Form 199 noted that his disability did result from a combat-related injury as defined in Title 26, U.S. Code, section 104.  The PEB was approved on 24 May 2012.

5.  On 15 July 2012, the applicant was honorably retired under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation), chapter 4, by reason of disability, permanent (ENHANCED) and given a separation program designator (SPD) code of SEJ.  He had served         3 years, 10 months, and 18 days of active service during his recent call-up and had 4 years and 5 months of prior active service. 

6.  A review of the available records failed to show that the applicant’s injuries/illnesses were combat-related.  

7.  Title 26, U.S. Code (the Internal Revenue Code), section 104 states, in pertinent part, that for purposes of this subsection, the term “combat-related injury” means personal injury or sickness which is incurred as a direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in extra hazardous service, or under conditions simulating war; or which is caused by an instrumentality of war. 

8.  Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) does not list “COMBAT-RELATED” as a phrase to be used when the narrative reason for separation is a disability retirement.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  While the applicant was in Iraq when he was evacuated, the available evidence does not show that his injuries/illnesses were combat-related.  His DA Form 199 shows he was injured deployment/combatives training, which is a “combat-related” injury only as defined by Title 26, U.S. Code, for tax purposes.

2.  In addition, "COMBAT-RELATED" is not an authorized phrase to be entered in item 28 of the DD Form 214 for disability retirements.



BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      
      ___________X_____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130014233





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130014233



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008718

    Original file (20140008718.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of correction of DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings), dated 11 August 2009, to show in: * item 8b (Disability Description), his chronic low back pain with right L5 radiculitis occurred as a result of falling to the ground from an Apache helicopter * item 10 (If Retired Because of Disability, the Board Makes the Recommended Finding That), his retirement was based on disability from an injury or disease received in the line of duty (LOD)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028715

    Original file (20100028715.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his 13 December 2004 DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings) as follows: * Add Department of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) code 5241 for cervical fusion * Add VASRD code 5003 for degenerative arthritis * Show a 60% combined total disability rating * Payment of back pay and allowances from 5 February 2005 (date placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL)) to the present 2. On 22 October 2004, a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020226.

    Original file (20130020226..txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). His medical evaluation board (MEB) paperwork included LOD determinations for the specified injuries and all injuries incurred while in Iraq in 2003. The applicant requests correction of his retirement orders to show his disability resulted from combat injuries incurred in Iraq.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110008239

    Original file (20110008239.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings) to show the following entries as "Yes" instead of "No": a. On 24 March 2003, he injured his knee while playing basketball at Fort Polk, LA, and he was treated at Bayne-Jones Army Community Hospital, AR. The applicant's DA Form 199 contains the following entries in item 10 (If Retired Because of Disability, the Board Makes the Recommended Finding that): * the Soldier's retirement is not based...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016968

    Original file (20110016968.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings) to show his retirement is based on a disability from injury or disease received in the line of duty as a direct result of armed conflict or caused by an instrumentality of war and incurring in the line of duty during a period of war as defined by law. He states: a. the Standard Forms (SF) 600 (Chronological Record of Medical Care), dated 19 February and 29 April 2008, were...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000157

    Original file (20140000157.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 9 April 2012, a medical evaluation board (MEB) convened at Fort Sam Houston and diagnosed him with the condition of low back strain that failed retention standards. a. SPD Code of "JFI" is appropriate when the narrative reason for discharge is disability, severance pay, combat-related, and the authority is Army Regulation 635-40, chapter 4; b. SPD Code of "JFO" is appropriate when the narrative reason for discharge is disability, severance pay, non-combat related, and the authority is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009392

    Original file (20140009392.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    of his DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings), dated 25 October 2005, to show his disease and disability were a direct result of armed conflict or caused by an instrumentality of war and incurred in the LOD during a period of war as defined by law. His asthma condition and back injury were incurred in the LOD while deployed to Iraq during the period 30 May 2003 to 15 July 2003. b. He provided a DA Form 2173, dated 8 July 2004, which states he injured his back when he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000564

    Original file (20130000564.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show his injuries are service-connected. The applicant is unclear or specific in his request whether he requests: * his Army disabling condition be service-connected * his Army disabling condition be combat-related * the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) award him service-connected disability compensation for all his injuries 2. He was further counseled and indicated: * he had reviewed the contents of the MEB packet and read his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017142

    Original file (20110017142.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The report noted she did not seek treatment for panic attacks and PTSD symptoms while serving in Iraq. (4) Refer the case to the Army Physical Disability Appeal Board. The record shows the applicant non-concurred with the informal PEB findings and recommendations and requested an appearance before a formal PEB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009738

    Original file (20120009738.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's DA Form 199 contains the following entries in item 10 (If Retired Because of Disability, the Board Makes the Recommended Finding that): a. The orders stated: * Disability is based on injury or disease received in the line of duty as a direct result of armed conflict or caused by an instrumentality of war and incurred in the line of duty during a period of war as defined by law: Yes * Member of an armed force on 24 September 1975: "No" * Disability resulted from a combat...