Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014213
Original file (20130014213.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	    24 April 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130014213 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of Item 28 (Most Significant Duty Assignment) on his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) to show "8th Tank Commander" instead of "8th Tank Gunner."

2.  The applicant states:

* he was advanced to the duty position of tank commander by his company commander while assigned to the 8th Tank Company, 8th Cavalry Regiment, 1st Cavalry Division, in Japan at Camp Crawford
* he completed tank commander training and the unit was short on noncommissioned officers to fill the position

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review.  A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members' records at the National Personnel Records Center, St. Louis, MO, in 1973.  It is believed the applicant's records were lost or destroyed in that fire.  The case is being considered using the DD Form 214 provided by the applicant.

3.  The applicant's DD Form 214 shows:

* he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 21 May 1953
* he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal 
* he was honorably released from active duty on 3 May 1955 and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group to complete his remaining service obligation
* he completed 1 year, 11 months, and 13 days of total creditable active military service
* he completed 1 year and 28 days of foreign and/or sea service

4.  The applicant does not provide any evidence showing he served as a tank commander in the 8th Tank Company.

5.  Special Regulation 615-360-1 (Enlisted Personnel – Separation of Enlisted Personnel), dated 24 June 1953, prescribed the policy and procedures for the preparation and distribution of separation documents during the period in question.  It stated that the last unit, or similar elements to which the individual was assigned, rather than the element of which he was a part while moving to a separation activity, would be entered in Item 28 of the DD Form 214.  It also noted that assignments to units for the purpose of transfer from a theater to the United States was considered part of the movement to a separation activity.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request for correction of his DD Form 214 to show his most significant duty assignment as "8th Tank Commander" was carefully considered.

2.  The governing regulation directed that the last unit to which an individual was assigned would be entered in Item 28 of the DD Form 214.  It is noted the requested entry and the current entry in Item 28 are both incorrect.  However, since the applicant's complete record is not available and he does not indicate a unit of assignment, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for making any correction to Item 28 at this time.

3.   In view of the foregoing, there is insufficient evidence to correct his DD Form 214 at this time.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _  X_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130014213



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130014213



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001914

    Original file (20090001914.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 10 February 1953, the 5th Cavalry Regiment, 61st Field Artillery Battalion, and Battery "A," 29th AAA AW Battalion, departed from Otaru, Japan for Pusan and Koje-do, Korea to relieve the 7th Cavalry. The applicant’s DD Form 214 shows his most significant assignment was with the 7th Cavalry Regiment. If the 7th Cavalry returned to Japan by 20 February 1953, it is very likely that the applicant completed most if not all of his foreign service in Japan rather than Korea and, therefore,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009439

    Original file (20080009439.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that item 10 (Date of Birth) on his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) be corrected to show he was born in January not June; that item 27 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) be corrected to show award of the Good Conduct Medal, the National Defense Service Medal, the Republic of Korea War Service Medal (ROKWSM), and four awards of the Purple Heart...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011585C070208

    Original file (20040011585C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that his DD Form 214 incorrectly lists his most significant duty assignment as a tanker with Tank Company, 15th Infantry at Fort Benning, Georgia, when in fact it was as an infantryman with the 40th Recon Company in Korea. Once the Korean War Service Medal has been authorized by the Department of the Air Force, the applicant may apply to this Board to add this foreign award to his DD Form 214. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021550

    Original file (20120021550.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he does not understand why the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) denied award of the "Army of Occupation Medal (Japan)." His DD Form 214 shows in: * Item 27 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) - Korean Service Medal with 1 silver service star and 2 bronze service stars and United Nations Service Medal * Item 28 (Most Significant Duty Assignment) - Headquarters Company, 2nd Battalion, 7th...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015432

    Original file (20130015432.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 27 of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows he earned the following awards: * Korean Service Medal with 2 bronze service stars * United Nations Service Medal 6. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes Army policy and criteria concerning individual military awards. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st award) for the period 8 January 1951 through 8...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018196

    Original file (20100018196.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This regulation shows the Republic of Korea as an area of eligibility for award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal during the period 1 October 1966 to 30 June 1974. c. The United Nations Service Medal was awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United States dispatched to Korea or adjacent areas on behalf of the United Nations, during the qualifying period between 27 June 1950 and 27 July 1954. d. The Korea Defense Service Medal was authorized by section 543 of the National...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021425

    Original file (20110021425.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 19 June 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110021425 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests correction of his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation – Honorable Discharge) to show his unit of assignment as Troop B, 24th Cavalry Reconnaissance Squadron, 4th Cavalry Group. The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017976

    Original file (20080017976.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his military records be corrected to show: a. the award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB); and b. one silver service star and four bronze service stars to be affixed to his already awarded Korean Service Medal. The applicant requested that his military records be corrected to show the award of the Combat Infantryman Badge, but he did not provide orders awarding him this badge. While the available records show that the applicant was an infantryman...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064276C070421

    Original file (2001064276C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his record be corrected to show he served as a tanker as opposed to a tailor, as is listed in his separation document (DD Form 214). The applicant’s military records were not available to the Board for review. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the individual concerned the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal for his honorable period of service from 2 February 1951 to 16 January 1954; by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020576

    Original file (20100020576.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) to show the: * Bronze Star Medal with "V" device * Purple Heart * Army Good Conduct Medal * National Defense Service Medal * Army of Occupation Medal with Japan Clasp * Republic of Korea Presidential Unit Citation 2. Army Regulation 600-68 (Good Conduct Medal), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted...