Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014147
Original file (20130014147.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

	
		BOARD DATE:	  1 May 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130014147 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he was commissioned through a Reserve Officers' Training Corps (ROTC) Scholarship program.

2.  The applicant states he was commissioned through the ROTC Scholarship program at Texas Tech University.  However, the entry on his DD Form 214 shows he was not commissioned through an ROTC Scholarship program.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of a DA Form 597-3 (Army Senior ROTC Scholarship Cadet Contract) and his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  U.S. Army Cadet Command, Lubbock, TX, memorandum, dated 10 August 2012, appointed the applicant as a Reserve commissioned officer of the U.S. Army in the rank of second lieutenant (2LT) upon execution of the Oath of Office.

2.  A DA Form 71 (Oath of Office - Military Personnel) shows the applicant executed the Oath of Office as a Reserve commissioned officer of the U.S. Army on 10 August 2010 at Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX.

3.  Texas Military Forces, Army National Guard (ARNG), Adjutant General's Department, Austin, TX, Orders 235-1058, dated 22 August 2012, as amended by Orders 235-1059, dated 22 August 2012, appointed the applicant in the ARNG in the rank of 2LT effective 10 August 2012.  The "Previous Assignment" lead line shows "ROTC."

4.  The applicant was ordered to active duty for training (ADT) on 25 March 2013.

5.  A DD Form 214 shows the applicant was honorably released from ADT on 
26 July 2013 and transferred to an ARNG unit.  It shows in block 15 (Commission or Loan Repayment Information), block b (Commissioned through ROTC Scholarship), the "NO" block contains an "X." 

6.  In support of his application the applicant provides a copy of a DA Form 597-3 that shows in:

   a.  Part I (Department of Army Agreements), the Army agreed to pay tuition, fees, books, and laboratory expenses for a period of 2 academic years.

   b.  Part II (Agreement of Scholarship Cadet Contracting in the Senior ROTC Program), block 4, upon completion of all requirements for appointment, the applicant agreed to accept appointment, if offered, as a commissioned officer in the U.S. Army Reserve or ARNG of the United States, in accordance with governing Army regulations.

   c.  The applicant and a professor of military science placed their signatures on the document on 16 June 2010 and 23 September 2010, respectively.

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Personnel Separations - Separation Documents), in effect at the time, prescribed the separation documents that must be prepared for Soldiers on retirement, discharge, release from active duty service, or control of the Active Army.  It also established standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  The instructions for block 15, block b, state to enter "Yes" or "No." 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows the applicant was commissioned through the ROTC Scholarship program on 10 August 2012 and he was ordered to ADT on 25 March 2013.

2.  The DD Form 214 he was issued upon completion of ADT incorrectly shows that he was not commissioned through the ROTC Scholarship program.

3.  Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant's DD Form 214.

BOARD VOTE:

___X_____  __X______  __X___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by deleting the "X" from the "NO" block and placing an "X" in the "YES" block of 
block 15b of his DD Form 214.



      _______ _  X _______   ___
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130014147



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130014147



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005711

    Original file (20130005711.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states she took an oath of office for appointment in the Oregon Army National Guard (ORARNG) on 29 July 2010 and the Federal recognition packet was turned in within the allowed time. Likewise, her service records do not contain the below documents related to her appointment: * NGB Form 62 (Application for Federal Recognition as an ARNG Officer) * Federal Recognition Board Proceedings * State appointment orders * Reserve or ARNG oath of office 6. Had her packet been processed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011795

    Original file (20140011795.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides: * DA Form 4836 (Oath of Extension of Enlistment or Reenlistment), dated 23 July 2008 * DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document – Armed Forces of the United States), dated 4 February 2009 * Orders Number 034-01, issued by the Northeastern Pennsylvania Army ROTC, University of Scranton on 4 February 2009 * Cadet Command (CC) Form 203-R (Guaranteed Reserve Forces Duty (GRFD)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150004491

    Original file (20150004491.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, because he signed the paperwork 4 days prior to his accession date, and based on Selected Reserve Incentive Program (SRIP) guidance that was rescinded, it was later determined that he was ineligible to receive the bonus and that he was required to pay back the $5,000 already paid. The applicant signed an agreement for the OAB while on the ROTC scholarship which was not authorized and violated the ARNG SRIP FY07 (Policy Number 07-06 with updates) effective 1 March 2009. b. While it...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014757

    Original file (20080014757.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides copies of her ROTC contract, ROTC disenrollment documents, ARNG enlisted discharge and commissioning order, her Oaths of Office, her acceptance of command of the 838th Military Police Company, her Federal recognition orders, two sets of orders to active duty for training, and four Leave and Earnings Statements (LESs). Had the applicant accepted entry onto active duty in lieu of repaying her ROTC debt, she would have been obligated to serve on active duty in an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010833

    Original file (20140010833.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides: * his letter requesting re-enrollment in the Reserve Officer Training Corps (ROTC) Program and commission as a 2LT * DA Form 597-3 (Army Senior ROTC Scholarship Cadet Contract), dated 1 October 2007 * his University of Tampa Permanent Academic Record * letter of support from Captain (CPT) J____ B. S____ * DD Form 785 (Record of Disenrollment from Officer Candidate-Type...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012998

    Original file (20100012998.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The board recommended that she: * Not be retained in Army ROTC as a scholarship or non-scholarship cadet * Be disenrolled from Army ROTC * Not be released from the ROTC contractual obligation * Not be ordered to active duty in an enlisted status * Be ordered to repay her debt 14. (9) A memorandum dated 2 May 2007 from the CG, USACC informed the applicant of her disenrollment from the ROTC Program, and ordered her to repay the advanced educational assistance provided by the Army for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130022218

    Original file (20130022218.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    f. Once he became obligated and was disenrolled from the ROTC Program for breach of contractual terms or any other disenrollment criteria – (1) he agreed to serve on enlisted active duty for a period of not more than 4 years or (2) if offered the opportunity to repay his advanced educational assistance in lieu of being ordered to active duty, he would be required to reimburse the U.S. Government an amount equal to the entire amount of financial assistance paid by the United States for his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012904

    Original file (20140012904.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The IM sent the following email to the CC: "If he contracts for SLRP as an enlisted Soldier - and stays in the contract for 1 year before accepting the commission - the SLRP will carry over when he becomes an officer (we would pay the remainder of that SLRP contract and no new one will be issued)." As a participant in the SMP, he understood that upon acceptance into the SMP, he was not eligible to continue in the ARNG Incentive Program and would be entitled to further incentive payments. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150004281

    Original file (20150004281.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Counsel states, in effect: * the applicant was denied due process associated with his 2012 ROTC disenrollment board * he was not given notice of the misconduct he was required to defend himself against at the disenrollment board * he was not given the right to make a knowing and voluntary waiver of his rights to what was a second disenrollment board that discharged him * due to the errors made by two boards, the applicant should not have been exposed to a disenrollment board or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019045

    Original file (20080019045.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant enlisted in the ARNG in pay grade E-3 on 9 August 2005 for a period of 8 years. The opinion pointed out that the terms of the scholarship contract required that a cadet either repay the debt monetarily or agree to be ordered to active duty through ROTC channels based on the needs of the Army. He enlisted in the ARNG (not on active duty) on 9 August 2005 in the grade of E-3 and he received an officer accession bonus of $10,000.00.