Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014059
Original file (20130014059.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF: 

		BOARD DATE:	    17 June 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130014059 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his record to show he was placed on the retired list in the rank/grade of sergeant major (SGM)/E-9 due to permanent physical disability.

2.  The applicant states:

   a.  He was on the promotion list for SGM during his last deployment to Iraq in 2007-08, and he completed Phase I of the U.S. Army Sergeants Major Course (USASMC) while deployed.  Due to his service-connected medical conditions received in Iraq, he was not capable of performing Phase II and elected to decline to attend.

   b.  He was advised to write a letter to discontinue the USASMC or he may have been forced to leave the Army National Guard (ARNG), so he did so.  He was still on the SGM promotion list when his Medical Evaluation Board (MEB)/Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) process began in early 2011; however, after two years of the MEB/PEB process, he learned he was removed from the promotion list and told he does not meet the criteria for promotion.
   
   c.  He further states he spent two years completing Phase I of the USASMC and he would not have quit lacking only a two-week course if the circumstances were different and he was in good health with no injuries.  His medical issues were the reason he was unable to attend Phase II of the USASMC and he asks the Board to consider the situation as no fault of his own and allow him to medically retire after more than 28 years of service as a SGM.   
3.  The applicant provides:

* a self-authored statement
* Promotion Eligibility Roster
* Enlisted Promotion Point Worksheet
* 4 memoranda
* ARNG Senior Enlisted Worksheet
* Numerous documents in support of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Rating Decision
* MEB Proceedings
* Informal PEB Proceedings
* 4 pages of electronic mail
* DA Form 3349 (Physical Profile)
* Orders D162-08

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Having prior service in the ARNG, the applicant enlisted in the ARNG on       22 March 1991.  Evidence shows he was promoted to the rank of master sergeant (MSG) on 8 February 2003.  

2.  Evidence contained in the applicant's records show he served in Southwest Asia from 24 March to 18 November 2003 and 24 January to 6 October 2008, in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom.  

3.  His records contain a memorandum, issued by the Adjutant General, Oklahoma ARNG, dated 8 March 2011, which states based on a thorough review of his most recent physical profile dated 4 October 2009, and all pertinent records and reports, a Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) Medical Retention Board determined he should not be retained in his MOS of 91Z (Mechanical Maintenance Supervisor) and he was referred to the non-duty PEB.

4.  Evidence contained in the applicant's records shows he was selected for retention in the OKARNG by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2011 and FY 2013 Qualitative Retention Boards.

5.  On 16 July 2013, the applicant was placed on the temporary disability retired list, honorably discharged from the ARNG, and assigned to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Retired) in the rank of MSG.   

6.  Evidence obtained from the OKARNG states the applicant was enrolled in and attending the USASMC 2009; however, he requested to withdraw from the course on 14 December 2009 due to personal and temporary medical reasons.  
7.  The applicant provides evidence which appears to indicate he was under consideration for promotion to the rank/grade of SGM/E-9 during the SGM Promotion Board conducted 11-12 January 2012, at the Regional Training Institute in Oklahoma City, OK.

8.  There is no evidence in the applicant's records and he provides no evidence that shows he successfully completed the USASMC or was subsequently promoted to the rank/grade of SGM/E-9.

9.  Army Regulation 600-8-19 (Enlisted Promotions and Reductions), paragraph 7-20h states, "For consideration for promotion to SGM, including concurrent appointment to command sergeant major individuals who are not graduates of the USASMC must be eligible to attend and complete the course.  This includes the time in service requirements before maximum age or maximum years of service.  Soldiers who were selected to attend but did not complete the course for any reason other than hardship are not eligible to attend the course again and, therefore, are not eligible for consideration or promotion to SGM.  This criterion is not waivable, and exceptions to policy will not be considered."

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request for correction of his record to show he was placed on the retired list in the rank/grade of SGM/E-9 due to permanent physical disability has been carefully examined.

2.  By the applicant's own admission, he withdrew from the USASMC and he provides no evidence that shows he successfully completed the USASMC or was subsequently promoted to the rank/grade of SGM/E-9.

3.  The applicant contends he withdrew from the course based on the service-connected medical conditions he received serving in Iraq; however, evidence shows he withdrew from the course due to personal and temporary medical reasons.

4.   In view of the foregoing, he is not entitled to the requested relief.








BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _  X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130014059





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130014059



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019374

    Original file (20110019374.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * the Oregon Army National Guard (ORARNG) did not follow a consistent policy of interpreting Army Regulations when they reduced him after retirement * he was promoted to the rank of E-9 and served successfully on active duty in this rank * after successfully completing Phase I of the U.S. Army Sergeants Major Course (USASMC) his unit was deployed to Iraq * he did not attend Phase II of the course because his brigade issued a policy letter stating no Soldier would be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021330

    Original file (20120021330.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that during the previous consideration of his case the Board noted he had requested a deferment from the U.S. Army Sergeants Major Course (USASMC) Phase II until his return from Iraq; however, such was not the case. A memorandum, dated 24 October 2003, requested deferment of the applicant's school date for USASMC Phase II. The letter provided by the applicant from the battalion personnel officer at the time confirms the applicant's contentions that he did not request a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012725

    Original file (20130012725.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 8 January 2013, by memorandum, an official at HRC Promotions Branch notified the applicant that as a result of his failure to meet the NCOES requirements of Army Regulation 600-8-19 (Enlisted Promotions and Reductions), paragraph 1-27b(2), his promotion orders to the rank/grade of SGM/E-9 have been revoked, effective 7 February 2012 and with a date of rank of 1 January 2004. b. Paragraph 1-27 (NCOES requirements for promotion and conditional promotions), a Soldier must be a USASMC...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070008768

    Original file (20070008768.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was conditionally promoted to SGM/E-9 with an effective date and DOR of 4 April 2003. The NGB recommended disapproval of the applicant's request based on there being no evidence in the documents provided by the applicant showing he ever completed USASMC. Because the applicant had not completed the USASMC and due to a denial of his request for extension of his service beyond 20 years of active duty, the applicant was reduced to the pay grade of E-8 with an effective date of 31...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060003662C070205

    Original file (20060003662C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, the WAARNG had discharge orders transferring him to the IRR. Yet, their State had discharge orders transferring him to the IRR. The evidence shows the applicant had been given two deferments for attendance of Phase II of the USASMA.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011549

    Original file (20110011549.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She has served in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) and on active duty for 34 years. As she was age 55 and she lacked the required NCO Education System (NCOES) course for promotion consideration to SGM which was completion of the USASMC; therefore, she had been ineligible for consideration by the promotion board, and her name was removed from the promotion list. The evidence of record shows the applicant was 55 years of age and was not an SMC graduate when she was erroneously considered for and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002576

    Original file (20120002576.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect: a. adjustment of his date of rank (DOR) to master sergeant (MSG)/E-8 to 8 August 2002 with pay and allowances from 8 August 2002 to 31 March 2004; b. adjustment of his DOR to sergeant major (SGM)/E-9 to 8 December 2004 with pay and allowances from 8 December 2004 to 31 May 2006; c. removal of the DA Form 2166-8 (Noncommissioned Officer (NCO) Evaluation Report (NCOER)) covering the period November 2002 through October 2003 from his official military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013704C071029

    Original file (20060013704C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Rea M. Nuppenau | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant states he was discharged from the Army National Guard (ARNG) as a Sergeant Major (SGM), E-9 for not meeting medical standards. The evidence of record shows the applicant accepted a conditional promotion to SGM knowing he was required to complete the U. S. Army Sergeants Major Course as a condition of that promotion.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025364

    Original file (20100025364.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Title 10 of the United States Code, section 12731 provides the legal authority for age and service (non-regular) retirements. Therefore, absent any evidence that his medical condition rendered him unfit for duty or disqualified him from attendance at the SGMC, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis to support a conclusion his reduction was unjust or that would support changing his retired grade.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067670C070402

    Original file (2002067670C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He contends that the review board did not have the original copy of his work to compare with his resources and therefore, relied on insufficient evidence when ordering his dismissal for plagiarism. In item 16 (Comments), the preparing official indicated that the applicant was dismissed from the USASMC for misconduct for plagiarism under the provisions of Army Regulation 351-1 (Individual Military Education and Training), paragraph 5-30. By a memorandum dated 12 July 2001, the U.S. Total...