Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013581
Original file (20130013581.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		
		BOARD DATE:	  22 April 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130013581 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests reinstatement of her grade to specialist four (SP4)/E-4. 

2.  The applicant states instead of addressing her medical condition, she was transferred to a remote area after having undergone a severe beating.

3.  The applicant does not provide any evidence. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records show she enlisted in the Regular Army in the rank/grade of private (PVT)/E-1 on 19 April 1977. 

3.  She completed basic combat and advanced individual training and she was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 71L (Administrative Specialist).  She was promoted to private (PV2)/E-2 on 19 October 1977. 

4.  Subsequent to completion of MOS training, she was reassigned to the U.S. Army Garrison, Fort Devens, MA.  She was promoted to private first class (PFC)/E-3 on 15 February 1978 and SP4/E-4 on 16 November 1978.  

5.  She served in Germany from on or about 4 March 1979 to on or about 25 April 1980.  She was assigned to the 144th Ordnance Company, 15th Ordnance Battalion. 

6.  On 18 October 1979, she accepted nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under the provisions of Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) for being absent without leave (AWOL) from 13 to 17 September 1979 and from 20 to 24 September 1979.  Her punishment consisted of a reduction to PFC/E-3, a forfeiture of pay, and extra duty.  She elected not to appeal her punishment. 

7.  On 31 March 1980, she accepted NJP under the provisions of Article 15 of the UCMJ for being AWOL from 28 to 31 March 1980.  Her punishment consisted of a reduction to PV2/E-2 and restriction and extra duty.  She appealed her punishment but her appeal was denied.

8.  On 23 April 1980, she accepted NJP under the provisions of Article 15 of the UCMJ for operating a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol.  Her punishment consisted of a reduction to PVT/E-1, a forfeiture of pay, and restriction.  She elected not to appeal her punishment.  

9.  She was honorably discharged from active duty on 28 April 1980.  Her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge) shows she completed 2 years, 11 months, and 29 days of active service and she had lost time from 13 to 16 September 1979, 28 to 30 March 1980, and 20 to 23 September 1980.  Her DD Form 214 also shows in:

* Item 4a (Grade, Rate or Rank) - PV1
* Item 4b (Pay Grade) - E-1
* Item 12h (Effective date of Pay Grade) - 23 April 1980

10.  There is no indication in her records that shows she was promoted back to SP4/E-4 prior to her discharge.  Furthermore, her medical records are not available for review with this case.  There is no indication in her records that she was subjected to any beating or suffered from any medical conditions.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows the applicant was promoted to SP4/E-4 on 16 November 1978.  However, she also accepted NJP under the provisions of Article 15 of the UCMJ on three separate occasions.  In each instance, she was reduced one grade.  

2.  There is no evidence in her records and she provides none to show the misconduct she committed - AWOL and operating a vehicle while under the influence - was caused by a beating or any medical condition she may have had. 

3.  There is no evidence in her records and she provides none to show she was promoted back to SP4/E-4 between the date she was reduced (23 April 1980) and the date she was discharged (28 April 1980).  Her records correctly show her rank, grade, and effective date of pay grade.  She provides no evidence of an error or an injustice and as such, she is not entitled to the requested relief. 

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X_____  __X______  _X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _ X  _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130013581





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130013581



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013457

    Original file (20080013457.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no indication in the applicant’s records that he was advanced beyond the rank/grade of PV2/E-2 during his active military service. Item 18 (Appointments and Reductions) of the applicant’s DA Form 2-1 shows the applicant’s ranks and dates of rank as follows: PVT/E-1, 9 May 1977; PV2/E-2, 10 November 1977; PVT/E-1, 7 March 1978; PV2/E-2, 1 March 1979; PVT/E-1, 28 September 1979; and PV2/E-2, 17 March 1980. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show he completed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013459

    Original file (20100013459.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests the following corrections be made to his military records: a. restoration to the rank and pay grade of private (PV2)/E-2 from the period 1 September 1978 to 21 September 1979, b. refund of all pay forfeited as a result of his sentencing and reduction in grade, c. promotion consideration to the grade of private first class (PFC)/E-3, d. promotion consideration to the grade of specialist (SPC)/E-4 prior to his separation on 21 September 1979, and e. payment of all due...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070017013

    Original file (20070017013.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Title 10, United States Code, section 1552, the authority under which this Board acts, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records is not empowered to set aside a conviction. However, there is no evidence that indicates the applicant was any less mature than other Soldiers of the same age who successfully completed military service. As a result, there is insufficient basis to upgrade the applicant's discharge to an honorable or a general discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006887

    Original file (20090006887.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Accordingly, on 28 April 1980, the applicant was discharged. The DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) he was issued confirms he was discharged for unsuitability-apathy, defective attitude or inability to expend effort constructively in accordance with chapter 13 of Army Regulation 635-200, with an Under Honorable Conditions (General) Discharge. The discharge proceedings were conducted in accordance with law and regulations applicable at the time and the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002895

    Original file (20150002895.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His parents had been divorced most of his life at the time of the incidents that lead to his discharge. However, his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) shows he was discharged on 7 August 1979, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), paragraph 14-33b(1), by reason of misconduct for frequent incidents of a discreditable nature with civil or military authorities. There is no evidence the applicant applied to the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000087

    Original file (20150000087.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. Army Regulation 635-5 prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040009133C070208

    Original file (20040009133C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the administrative bar to reenlistment be removed from his records, and that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Duty) be corrected to show his rank as E-3 or E-4 and award of the Good Conduct Medal. The applicant states that he was an above average Soldier and believes he is entitled to the Good Conduct Medal. The record clearly shows that the applicant was a substandard Soldier with six incidents of NJP and a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018224

    Original file (20110018224.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her records to show she held the rank of specialist four (SP4)/pay grade E-4 from 1 June 1981 through the date of her release from active duty (REFRAD) and payment of all pay and allowances due as a result of the correction. In addition, records show she was REFRAD in grade E-2 with an effective date of pay grade of 27 April 1981 and the applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011355

    Original file (20110011355.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * Self-authored statement * 20-Year Letter, dated 20 April 2000 * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 13 June 1991 * Undated memorandum, subject: Enrollment in Phase I Course * Active duty order * 3 Certificates (Army Achievement Medal, Outstanding Dedicated Service, Honorable Discharge) * DA Form 2173 (Statement of Medical Examination and Duty Status), dated 1 June 1998 * Released from active duty (REFRAD) order *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010111

    Original file (20080010111.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to show her correct rank and pay grade. After completing all required training, she was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS), 75D (Personnel Records Specialist). The available evidence also shows that the applicant received nonjudicial punishment while serving in the rank and pay grade, SP4/E-4.