IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 3 April 2014
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130013441
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC) for service in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN).
2. The applicant states his unit in the RVN was awarded the PUC. He would like to have this medal shown on his DD Form 214.
3. The applicant provides copies of:
* Certificate for award of the PUC to the 2nd Battalion, 5th Cavalry Regiment, dated 23 October 1967
* 1st Air Cavalry Division Cavalier, Volume 2, Number 44, dated November 1965 (8-pages)
* DD Form 214
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. On 12 December 1963, the applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States. He completed his initial training and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman).
3. Records show that the applicant was awarded the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle and Mortar Bars based on:
a. his qualifying as expert with the M-14 rifle on 13 January 1965; and
b. his qualifying as expert with the 81 millimeter mortar on 29 December 1964.
4. On 1 July 1965, the applicant was assigned for duty as an ammunition bearer with Company D, 2nd Battalion, 5th Cavalry Regiment, 1st Cavalry Division, located at Fort Benning, GA.
5. On 15 August 1965, the applicant departed Fort Benning with his unit for duty in the RVN.
6. Special Orders Number 120, 1st Cavalry Division, dated 29 October 1965, awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge to the applicant.
7. On 24 November 1965, the applicant departed the RVN.
8. On 1 February 1966, the applicant was honorably released from active duty. His DD Form 214 shows his awards as:
* Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Mortar Bar
* Vietnam Service Medal
9. Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows that his conduct and efficiency ratings were excellent. The applicants records do not contain any evidence of disciplinary action. There is no evidence to show that the commander took any action to deny him the Army Good Conduct Medal.
10. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards):
a. Appendix B of this regulation shows that based on the applicant's dates of service in the RVN he participated in the Vietnam Counteroffensive.
b. This same regulation states that a bronze service star will be awarded for wear on the Vietnam Service Medal for participation in each campaign.
c. The Vietnam Campaign Medal with 1960 Device was awarded by the Government of Vietnam to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961 through 28 March 1973. Qualifying service included assignment in Vietnam for 6 months or more.
d. The National Defense Service Medal is awarded for honorable active service for any period between 1 January 1961 through 14 August 1974.
11. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to enlisted Soldiers who had completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service. The enlisted person must have had all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings and no convictions by a court-martial.
12. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the unit awards received by units serving in the Republic of Vietnam. This publication shows that the 2nd Battalion, 5th Cavalry Regiment, during the time of the applicant's assignment, was cited in Department of the Army General Orders (DAGO) Number 40, dated in 1967 for award of the Presidential Unit Citation, and in DAGO Number 59, dated in 1969, for award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. Special orders announced award of the CIB to the applicant. Therefore, this badge should be shown on his DD Form 214.
2. The applicants records clearly show that he distinguished himself in the performance of his military service as evidenced by achieving all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings. Therefore, it is presumed that his not receiving an Army Good Conduct Medal for his service was an oversight. Accordingly, he should be awarded this medal.
3. Records show that the applicant participated one campaign period during his service in the RVN. Therefore, he is eligible for award of a bronze service star to be affixed to his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal.
4. Records show the applicants unit was cited in general orders for award of the Presidential Unit Citation. Therefore, his records should be corrected to show this unit award.
5. Records show the applicant served during a qualifying period for award of the National Defense Service Medal. Therefore, this medal should be shown on his DD Form 214.
6. Records show that the applicant's unit was cited in general orders for award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation. Therefore, his records should be corrected to show this foreign unit award.
7. Records show that the applicant served during a qualifying period for award of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with 1960 Device. Therefore, his records should be corrected to show this award.
8. Records show the applicant qualified as an expert with his rifle and mortar and was awarded the corresponding marksmanship badge. Therefore his records should be corrected to show award of the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle and Mortar Bars.
BOARD VOTE:
____X___ ____X___ ___X__ _ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:
a. deleting from his DD Form 214 all award entries; and
b. adding on his DD Form 214 the following awards:
* Presidential Unit Citation
* Army Good Conduct Medal
* National Defense Service Medal
* Vietnam Service Medal with one bronze service star
* Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit citation
* Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with 1960 Device
* Combat Infantryman Badge
* Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle and Mortar Bars
_______ _ X ______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20130013441
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20130013441
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003354
Paragraph 7-13 of the awards regulation contains guidance on the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC) and states, in pertinent part, that it is awarded for extraordinary heroism in action against an armed enemy. The evidence of record confirms the applicant held and served in MOS 11B as a light weapons infantryman during his assignment to the 1st Battalion, 5th Cavalry Regiment, which was a qualifying infantry unit, during the period (23 October-26 November 1965) the unit received the PUC for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021309
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) by showing: * his last unit of assignment as Company C, 1st Battalion, 7th Cavalry Regiment, 1st Cavalry Division * his duty military occupational specialty (DMOS) as 11B1O (Infantryman Indirect Fireman) * his unit awards include the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC), Valorous Unit Award (VUA), Meritorious Unit Commendation (MUC) * award of the Combat Infantryman Badge...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019371
The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Separation or Discharge) be corrected to show award of the Vietnam Service Medal, Air Medal, National Defense Service Medal, Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Pistol and Rifle Bars, Presidential Unit Citation (PUC), and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation. He had served 2 years, 9 months, and 15 days of active service and his DD Form 214 issued at the time of his...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013439
His DD Form 214, item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized), lists the following earned awards: * NDSM * RVNCM with Device * Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) * ARCOM 8. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the AGCM for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 30 November 1965 through 13 November 1967, and to add this award to his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013922
The applicant's OMPF also contains Headquarters, 1st Cavalry Division (Airmobile) Special Orders Number 124, dated 2 November 1965, which awarded several members of the unit the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and several other members the CMB. The evidence further shows that as a result of an administrative error, the CIB instead of the CMB was entered in item 26 of the applicant's DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017971
The applicant's military personnel records do not contain any orders or other evidence showing award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. However, the evidence shows the applicant was awarded MOS 11B, he served as an infantryman in duty MOS 11B while assigned to an infantry company, and he was cited for heroism in military operations against a hostile force in the RVN. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a....
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070007488C080407
The applicant requests, in effect, that Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) and Item 23a (Specialty Number & Title) of his 9 December 1968 separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected. Item 23a of the DD Form 214 he was issued shows he held the MOS 11C and Item 24 shows he earned the following awards: NDSM; VSM; RVNCM; CIB; Parachutist Badge; and ARCOM. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060008403
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 8 February 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060008403 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests, in effect, that Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected to show the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020960
Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes Army policy and criteria concerning individual military awards. Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to award him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 15 June 1964 to 14 June 1967 and to correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for his qualifying...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021143
His DD Form 214 shows he was awarded or authorized the: * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) * Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Campaign Medal with Device (1960) * Air Medal * two overseas service bars * Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14) 6. Notwithstanding the NJP, in light of his overall record of service, it would be appropriate to award him the AGCM (1st Award) based on completion of a qualifying period of active Federal service from 5...