Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013253
Original file (20130013253.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  17 April 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130013253 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the Army Achievement Medal and issuance of the medal. 

2.  The applicant states due to his early release and the time award was granted to discharge from last duty station, there was not enough time to get the award documented on his DD Form 214. 

3.  The applicant provides a certificate showing award of the Army Achievement Medal. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army for 2 years on 19 August 1982.  He completed basic combat and advanced individual training and he was awarded military occupational specialty 13B (Cannon Crewman).  

3.  He served in Germany from 2 December 1982 to 15 July 1984.  He was assigned to A Battery, 1st Battalion, 18th Field Artillery.  

4.  He was honorably released from active duty in the rank/grade of specialist four (SP4)/E-4 on 18 August 1984 by reason of completion of his required service.  He completed 2 years of active duty with no lost time and he was fully eligible to reenlist.  His DD Form 214 show she was awarded or authorized the:

* Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16)
* Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Grenade Bar
* Army Service Ribbon
* Overseas Service Ribbon

5.  He submitted a certificate, dated 11 July 1984, signed by lieutenant colonel (LTC) J. R. M----y, Field Artillery, awarding the applicant the Army Achievement Medal for outstanding achievement from 1 September 1983 to 14 July 1984, while assigned to A Battery, 1st Battalion, 18th Field Artillery.  

6.  A review of historical records of the 1st Battalion, 18th Field Artillery, indicates LTC J. R. M----y (now a retired colonel) was the commander of the 1st Battalion, 18th Field Artillery during the period in question. 

7.  The applicant's records do not contain permanent orders confirming his award of the Army Achievement Medal and the award is not listed on his DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record - Part II). 

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-19 (Military Awards) states the Army Achievement Medal is awarded to any member of the Armed Forces of the United States who, while serving in a noncombat area on or after 1 August 1981, distinguished himself or herself by meritorious service or achievement.  As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.

9.  The applicant's records do not contain official orders awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award).  His records also do not contain any derogatory information in the form of lost time, conviction by a court-martial, and/or suspension of favorable personnel.

9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency, and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service.  This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service.  Although there is no automatic entitlement to the Army Good Conduct Medal, disqualification must be justified.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's records do not contain permanent orders awarding him the Army Achievement Medal.  However, he provides a certificate that shows he was awarded this medal by LTC J. R. M----y, Commander, 1st Battalion, 18th Field Artillery.  The Army did not place the permanent orders on the certificate during the period in question.  However, the duration of the award, the applicant's achievements, and the signature authority are all consistent with his period of service.  Therefore, as a matter of equity, he is entitled to this award and correction of his DD Form 214 to show it. 

2.  The evidence of record confirms he served honorably on active duty during the period 19 August 1982 through 18 August 1984.  He completed 2 years of active service, attained the rank/grade of SP4/E-4, and he was fully eligible to reenlist at the time of his release from active duty.  His records contain no derogatory information or evidence that shows he was denied award of the Good Conduct Medal.  Therefore, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the first award of the Good Conduct Medal and to correct his DD Form 214 to show this award.  

BOARD VOTE:

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:
* awarding him the Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity during the period 19 August 1982 through 18 August 1984
* adding to his DD Form 214 the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) and Army Achievement Medal (2nd Award)
* issuing him the two medals



      _______ _   X_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130013253





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130013253



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008963

    Original file (20120008963.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to add the Meritorious Unit Commendation (MUC), Kuwait Liberation Medal-Government of Kuwait (KLM-KU), and a Shoulder Sleeve Insignia (SSI). The applicant states these items were never added to his DD Form 214 and should have been placed in his record as soon as he received the awards. The evidence of record shows he was deployed to Saudi Arabia from 16 February 1991 to 10 May 1991;...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080001003

    Original file (20080001003.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the unit listed in Item 12 (Last Duty Assignment and Major Command) of his 26 June 1968 separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected. The DD Form 214 he was issued upon his REFRAD shows his last duty assignment was Battery A, 7th Battalion, 18th Artillery. The evidence of record also confirms that neither the applicant's unit in the RVN or his unit at Fort Benning were awarded the PUC during the periods of his assignments to these units.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006109

    Original file (20110006109.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, he is not entitled to have his record corrected to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting C Battery, 6th Battalion, 14th Field Artillery Regiment, USAREUR E7 from item 7 of his DD Form 214; b. adding Headquarters and Headquarters Battery, 6th Battalion, 14th Field Artillery Regiment, 1st Armored Division, USAREUR E7 to item 9 of his DD Form 214; c. awarding him the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020979

    Original file (20100020979.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the Army Achievement Medal and that two letters of commendation be added to his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). There are no orders in his records that show he was awarded the Army Achievement Medal. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100020979 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082409C070215

    Original file (2002082409C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The date of award of this MOS is not of record.] A “Officer’s Commission” Certificate which states “…. Other than questionable documents submitted by the applicant, there is no documentation that the applicant was ever commissioned or served as a commissioned officer in either the Regular Army, the Reserve, or the National Guard.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004100675C070208

    Original file (2004100675C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The evidence of record shows he received excellent EERs, award of the Army Achievement Medal, and the second award of the Army Good Conduct Medal during the period of service under review. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected: a. by showing he was discharged on 27 January 1986 with a general discharge in the...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050005497

    Original file (20050005497.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Certificates of Achievement, Letters of Appreciation, and similar documents are not authorized for entry on a Soldier's DD Form 214. The military medal of gold and green the applicant described is not an authorized medal awarded by the Army or by the Department of Defense to Army personnel. From the description of the medal given by the applicant, the description of the event – a world wide event, his geographical assignment at the time, and the evidence – that he received a certificate of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004510

    Original file (20140004510.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that an Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) Certificate, dated 20 July 2012, and Permanent Orders (PO) 277-10, dated 3 October 2012, be removed from his Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR). His AMHRR contains the contested ARCOM Certificate, which shows he received the award for the period 19 August 2009 through 27 July 2012 while he was assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Company (HHC), 1st Battalion, 502nd Infantry Regiment, 2nd Brigade Combat...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010241

    Original file (20080010241.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his general discharge under honorable conditions be upgraded to honorable. On 5 September 1989, the applicant’s commander recommended separation from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 14, for misconduct due to commission of a serious offense. There is no indication that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014559

    Original file (20110014559.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests award of the Overseas Service Ribbon and correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show this award and the Army Achievement Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity during the period 4 October 1979 through 3 October 1982 * adding the...