Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012779
Original file (20130012779.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		

		BOARD DATE:	  18 March 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130012779 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).

2.  The applicant states during his time in Korea he served on the Demilitarized Zone (DMZ) for a total of 120 days in military occupational specialty (MOS) 11C (Infantry Indirect Fire Crewman).  During August 1976 there was a “configuration” that resulted in an exchange of small arms fire as well as artillery fire.  That was the same day the North Koreans hacked four U.S. servicemen to death.  He believes that event meets the criteria for award of the CIB.  He adds that he believes his PTSD stems from that event and the CIB is needed to assist him in getting his claim for service-connected PTSD approved.  

3.  The applicant provides no additional documentary evidence. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  On 6 August 1976, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army.  He completed training and was awarded MOS 11C.

3.  His DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows he was credited with service in Korea during the period 6 January 1977 through 9 January 1978.  It further shows he served in Company C, 1st Battalion, 17th Infantry Regiment.

4.  On 5 August 1979, he was honorably released from active duty.  He completed 3 years of creditable active service.  His DD Form 214 does not show the CIB.

5.  His record is void of documentation showing he served in active ground combat during his service in Korea.

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the CIB is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS.  They must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends he served in action in Korea that would warrant award of the CIB.

2.  His record shows he served in an infantry battalion in Korea during the period 6 January 1977 through 9 January 1978, and he states he served on the DMZ for 120 days.  He mentions incidents that happened in August 1976, before he arrived in Korea.  However, there is no evidence of record to show he ever served in active ground combat.  Therefore, there is an insufficient basis upon which to award him the CIB and add this badge to his DD Form 214 at this time.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X__  ____X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _ X  _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130012779



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130012779



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009825

    Original file (20140009825.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Included in this letter, he states: * he was housed at Camp Kitty Hawk which was adjacent to the DMZ * in response to the ax murders of two American officers (1976), the Commanding General, United Nations Command placed the unit on alert for many months * in 1977 his unit recovered the bodies of the helicopter crewmen who had been shot down by North Korea * his unit provided security and supplies for a major tunnel discovery operation * throughout the year of his assignment, there were many...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050008013

    Original file (20050008013.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). The applicant's Personnel Qualification Record (DA Form 2-1) shows that he served in the Republic of Korea from 5 May 1975 through 31 May 1976. Service in authorized combat area alone is not sufficient to support award of the CIB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100006929

    Original file (20100006929.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This paragraph states that there are basically three requirements for award of the CIB. A Soldier serving in an infantry MOS in an infantry unit on the DMZ alone is insufficient to warrant award of the CIB. ____________x_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010174C071029

    Original file (20060010174C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's Military Personnel Records Jacket is void of any orders or other documents indicating the applicant was recommended for or awarded the CIB while he was serving on active duty, or that confirms the participation of his unit in active ground combat with hostile forces, or his personal participation in active ground combat while he was a member of a qualifying infantry unit. A recipient must be personally present and under hostile fire while serving in an assigned infantry...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011259

    Original file (20130011259 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests: a. award of the Meritorious Service Medal, Combat Medical Badge, and Senior or Master Aviation Badge and b. correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: * award of the – * Meritorious Service Medal * Combat Medical Badge * Senior or Master Aviation Badge * Republic of Korea Presidential Unit Citation * any other authorized unit citations * his periods of service in military occupational specialties (MOS's) 68G (Airframe...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000419

    Original file (20120000419.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Korea Defense Service Medal is authorized for award to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who served on active duty in support of the defense of the Republic of Korea. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to support awarding him the CIB for this period of service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017294

    Original file (20080017294.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 7 (Last Duty Assignment and Major Command) of the applicant's DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows he was assigned to D Company, 2nd Battalion, 36th Infantry, U.S. Army, Europe. Army Regulation 600-8-22 states that the Korea Defense Service Medal is authorized for award to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who have served on active duty in support of the defense of the Republic of Korea. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020405

    Original file (20120020405.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: a. The Soldier must be an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties, he must be assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat, and he must actively participate in such ground combat. However, award of the CIB is not supported by any verifiable documented evidence that shows he was personally engaged in active ground combat during his period of service in Korea.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003768

    Original file (20090003768.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 9 July 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090003768 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show “combat service” in Korea and award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). Army veterans and service members who served in Korea on the DMZ between 4 January 1969 to 31 March 1994 and meet the general criteria for award of the CIB, may submit an application (to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024738

    Original file (20100024738.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was honorably released from active duty on 15 July 1991 to the control of his ARNG unit. With respect to his service in Korea, the evidence of record shows the applicant served in Korea as a rifleman to Company A, 2nd Battalion, 8th Cavalry from 22 May 1964 to 25 June 1965. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to support awarding him the CIB for this period of service.