Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012475
Original file (20130012475.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  18 March 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130012475 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM).

2.  The applicant states it was an administrative oversight. 

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.



2.  The applicant’s records were damaged in the National Personnel Records Center fire in 1973 but for the most part are available.  That part of his records that would show his conduct and efficiency ratings is not available.

3.  Having prior inactive service in the Army National Guard, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 10 April 1952 for a period of 3 years.  He served as an operating room technician in Korea and he was honorably discharged in the temporary rank of private first class (PFC) after completing 2 years, 
11 months, and 14 days of creditable active service. 

4.  His DD Form 214 does not show the AGCM as an authorized award.

5.  There are no orders for the AGCM in the available records.

6.  His Service Record does not show any lost time or record of trial by court-martial that would have precluded him from being awarded the AGCM.

7.  Army Regulation 600-65 (Service Medals), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 
27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year.  A Soldier's conduct and efficiency ratings, including those pertinent to attendance at service schools, must have all been recorded as “excellent” or higher.  There must have been no convictions by court-martial.  However, there was no right or entitlement to the medal until the immediate commander made a positive recommendation for its award and until the awarding authority announced the award in general orders.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The applicant was honorably released from active duty in the temporary rank of PFC with 2 years, 11 months, and 14 days of total active service and no lost time.  Although that part of his records that would have shown his conduct and efficiency ratings is not available, he had no record of any disciplinary action or a commander's disqualification.  It appears he met the eligibility criteria for the first award of the AGCM for the period 10 April 1952 through 23 March 1955 based on completion of a period of qualifying service ending with the termination of a period of Federal military service.  Therefore, he should be awarded the AGCM (1st Award) and his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award.



BOARD VOTE:

___X____  ___X____  ___X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  awarding him the first award of the AGCM for the period 10 April 1952 through 23 March 1955 and

	b.  adding the AGCM (1st Award) to his DD Form 214.



      _______ _ X  ________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130012475





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130012475



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080003620

    Original file (20080003620.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that Item 27 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Authorized or Awarded) of his 30 June 1952 separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected by adding the Army Good Conduct Medal, Korean Conflict Medal, Certificate of Achievement, and the Infantry 645th Engineer 5th Army Medal. The applicant provides his DD Form 214 in support of his application. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017571

    Original file (20130017571.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM). Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), stated the AGCM was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. The applicant in this case did...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021667

    Original file (20140021667.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Based on his overall record of service, it would be appropriate at this time to award him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 23 April 1962 through 22 April 1964 and to correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. The applicant’s USMC records are not available for review; however, the applicable regulation, in effect at the time, made no provision to list awards receive outside the period covered by the DD Form 214. The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012701

    Original file (20140012701.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-65 (Service Medals), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025550

    Original file (20100025550.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides for award of the Korean Service Medal. There is no evidence of record to confirm that the applicant served in Japan. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. adding to his DD Form 214 the AGCM and the NDSM and b. amending item 19 of his DD Form 214 to show he entered into active duty on 17 April 1951.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009863

    Original file (20080009863.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his record and separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected to reflect unit awards to which he is entitled based on his service in Korea. Other than members separated by reason of disability, there are no provisions for awarding the AGCM for a period of active duty service of less than 1 year. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the Army Good Conduct...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027487

    Original file (20100027487.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    As a result, it would be appropriate to award him the AGCM for this qualifying period of active duty service and to add this award to his DD Form 214. The evidence also shows that based on his active duty service and his service in Korea, he is also eligible for the NDSM and ROKWSM. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the AGCM for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 1...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013217

    Original file (20100013217.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his last name be corrected in item 1 (Last Name, First Name, Middle Name) of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) and that item 27 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) be amended by adding the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM), and two additional bronze service stars to be affixed to the Korean Service Medal (KSM). Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024100

    Original file (20110024100.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award. Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the PH for wounds received on 17 April 1953; b. awarding him the AGCM (1st award) for the period 11 February 1953 through 29 March 1954; c. adding the following awards to his DD Form 214: * Purple Heart * Army Good Conduct...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021490

    Original file (20100021490.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). His military records are not available to the Board for review. This form also shows in: * item 3 the entry PVT-2 (P) [Permanent) 22 April 1955 * item 26 (Foreign and/or Sea Service) the entry 10 months and 26 days * item 27 the National Defense Service Medal * item 28 (Most Significant Duty Assignment) the entry Radio Operator, Headquarters and Headquarters Company (HHC), 34th Infantry Regiment *...