Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012238
Original file (20130012238.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	    13 March 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130012238 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge.  

2.  He states:

	a.  He was never issued a Combat Infantryman Badge for his actions during the 1968 Tet Offensive campaign.

	b.  He was qualified to operate a M-60 machine gun after he completed advanced individual training and being awarded military occupational specialty 11B10 (Light Weapons Infantryman).

	c.  He worked in MOS 11B and defended the perimeter of the Tan Son Nhut airbase along with U.S. infantry as well as the Army of the Republic of Vietnam units.  

	d.  He was told by his commanding officer that members of his unit were being recommended for award of Combat Infantryman Badge and other decorations, so he took him at his word.  

   e.  It has been 45 years and he's applying for this badge now because he never had time to deal with it after his return to civilian life.  He was trying to figure out what to do and making a life for himself and his family.  

3.  He provides a self-authored statement and photographs.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 31 August 1966.  

3.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in:

* Item 22 (MOSs) he was awarded primary MOS 73C (Distribution/Examination Specialist) on 10 April 1967
* Item 31 (Foreign Service) he served in Vietnam from 29 July 1967 through 16 April 1969
* Item 38 (Record of Assignments) he performed duties as a Voucher Examination Specialist in duty MOS 73C2O during his tour in Vietnam
* Item 38 he was assigned to the 10th, 24th, and 7th Finance Section
* Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) no entry for the Combat Infantryman Badge 

4.  His service record does not contain orders showing he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge.

5.  He was honorably released from active duty on 17 April 1969.  His DD Form 214 doesn't show he was awarded or authorized the Combat Infantryman Badge.

6.  He provided a self-authored statement in which he states he would like orders authorizing him the Combat Infantryman Badge.  The issuance of the pin and badge would be appreciated because they were not issued to him.  He mentioned members of his unit and friends were awarded the Purple Heart and Bronze Star Medal and even a company clerk received a Bronze Star Medal.  He's not trying to pass himself as a hero, but he just wants what he earned.  



7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Combat Infantryman Badge is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS.  They must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's service record shows he completed training as a Distribution/Examination Specialist and he was awarded MOS 73C.  There are no orders in the applicant's record that show he was awarded an infantry MOS.  

2.  The evidence of record shows he performed duties as a Voucher Examination Specialist in MOS 73C with 10th, 24th, and 7th Finance Section in Vietnam.  

3.  During the Tet Offensive he very well may have temporarily performed infantryman-type duties; however, based on Army Regulation 600-8-22 award of the Combat Infantryman Badge requires service in an infantry MOS in an infantry unit engaged in active ground combat with the enemy.

4.  Based on Army Regulation 600-8-22, award of the Combat Infantryman Badge requires service in an infantry MOS in an infantry unit engaged in active ground combat with the enemy.  However, his service record does not contain evidence that shows he met all the requirements for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge.  Therefore, there is no basis for granting his request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130012238





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130012238



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017130

    Original file (20140017130.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states his service record shows he had a duty military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B as of 8 November 1966 after completing Infantry advanced individual training (AIT) at Fort Ord, CA. The applicant provides: * a list of units participating in defense of Tan Son Nhut Airbase during the 1968 Tet Offensive * Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) Docket AR20130012238, dated 13 March 2014 * an excerpt from Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) CONSIDERATION...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021536

    Original file (20100021536.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's OMPF is void of any orders or documents that indicate he was ever recommended for or awarded the PH or CIB while serving in Vietnam or at any other time during his military service. The applicant contends he should be awarded the PH, CIB, and his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show all awards to which he may be entitled. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the AGCM for his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007505

    Original file (20120007505.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence of record and he did not provide any evidence that shows he completed an air assault training course at any time during his service. Evidence of record shows the applicant was initially awarded primary MOS 11H. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting the Vietnam Service Medal from item 24 of his DD Form 214; b. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002569

    Original file (20140002569 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. ____________X___________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002569

    Original file (20140002569.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. ____________X___________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000757

    Original file (20080000757.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that Item 5 (Date of Birth) of his separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected to show 8 August 1950. He also requests that his DD Form 214 be corrected to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge for his Republic of Vietnam service. The applicant's military personnel record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army on 13 March 1970.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025661

    Original file (20100025661.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no orders in the applicant's military service record awarding him the Purple Heart or the Combat Infantryman Badge. The applicant submitted a statement from a former Special Forces CPT, dated 13 September 2010. The CPT stated both he and the applicant were wounded during a mortar attack.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010495

    Original file (20130010495.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * he served his country honorably from 6 February 1967 to 12 December 1968 including 13 months and 27 days in combat * he should be entitled to the Army Good Conduct Medal based on Executive Order Number 10444, dated 10 April 1953 * he was never awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge despite holding an infantry specialty and participating in many battles and campaigns 3. A review of his service record does not reveal special orders that show he was awarded the Combat...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003253

    Original file (20130003253.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to reveal any evidence that he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge. There are no orders that show the applicant was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the "VSM w/ Bz Svc Star"; and b. adding to item 24 of his DD Form 214 the: * Army Good Conduct Medal (1st...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021533

    Original file (20100021533.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows he served in Vietnam in MOS 36K. There is no evidence in the available records and he did not submit substantiating evidence that shows he held an infantry MOS or that he participated in active ground combat while assigned to an infantry unit. ______________X___________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.