Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011409
Original file (20130011409.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		

		BOARD DATE:	  25 February 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130011409 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).

2.  The applicant states, in effect, the CIB eligibility criteria for advisors apply to him.  However, he never received the award. 

3.  The applicant provides:

* letter from an elected representative to the Secretary of Defense, dated 20 October 1997
* four selected pages from Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards), dated 11 December 2006
* Letter of Commendation, dated 1 January 1967, with first and second endorsements
* copy of a photograph taken at a Vietnamese special forces camp
* DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge)  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  On 1 June 1965, he was inducted into the Army of the United States.  He was awarded primary military occupational specialty (MOS) 36K (Wireman) and secondary MOS 36C (Lineman).  The highest rank/grade he held was specialist four/E-4.

3.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served as a wireman and switchboard operator while assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Battery, 2nd Howitzer Battalion, 13th Artillery, during the period 10 March 1966 to 3 March 1967.

4.  On 7 March 1967, he was honorably released from active duty as an early overseas returnee.  He completed 1 year, 9 months, and 7 days of creditable active service.  His DD Form 214 does not show the CIB.

5.  He submits a Letter of Commendation showing he was commended for his efforts as part of a team in coordinating and planning field artillery fires. 

6.  His record is void of any orders or other documents that indicate he was recommended for or awarded the CIB by the proper authority.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the CIB is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS.  They must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size.  Additionally, Appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 states that during the Vietnam era the CIB was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 further states that during the Vietnam Conflict, subsequent to 1 March 1961, any officer, warrant officer, or enlisted Soldier whose branch was other than Infantry will be eligible for award of the CIB provided all the below listed requirements have been met:

     a.  Assigned as advisor to an Infantry unit, Ranger unit, Infantry-type unit of the civil guard of regimental or smaller size, and/or Infantry-type unit of the self-defense corps unit of regimental or smaller size of the Vietnamese government during any period such unit was engaged in actual ground combat.
     b.  Assigned as advisor of an irregular force comparable to the above Infantry units under similar conditions.
     c.  Personally present and under fire while serving in an assigned primary duty as a member of a tactical advisory team while the unit participated in ground combat.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

His record shows he served in a field artillery unit in Vietnam in the non-infantry positions of wireman and lineman.  Though he contends he performed advisor duties during that time, there is no evidence he was assigned as an advisor to an infantry or infantry-type unit.  Therefore, absent evidence of record to show he served in a qualifying MOS in active ground combat while he was assigned to or attached to an infantry or infantry-type unit in Vietnam, there is an insufficient basis for awarding him the CIB and adding this badge to his DD Form 214.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X__  ___X_____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _ X  _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130011409



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130011409



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001056230C070420

    Original file (2001056230C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    His record contains orders showing that on 12 March 1971 the applicant was assigned to the US Military Assistance Command Vietnam, Advisory Team 17, as Senior Advisor in an infantry duty position (military occupational specialty (MOS) G1542). The evidence of record shows that the applicant although an artilleryman by branch was assigned to the duty position of an infantry senior advisor to a Vietnamese civil guard unit at the time he was wounded in action. by showing that the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009802

    Original file (20100009802.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. The applicant was assigned to a unit during a period of time that the unit was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027964

    Original file (20100027964.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His record is also void of documentation showing he was awarded the CIB. In a statement provided with his application, the applicant indicated that he served with 1st Battalion, 20th Infantry, as an RTO and forward observer, but he was not eligible for the CIB because of his MOS. While the available documentation generally confirms his account of his service in Vietnam, it does not show definitively that he was assigned primary duty under MACV as an RTO accompanying infantry or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001048

    Original file (20130001048.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board referred to Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) stating that "the CIB is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry military occupational specialty (MOS). As documented in his award of the Bronze Star Medal, in September, 1970, he was given the title of "Light Weapons Infantry Advisor" assigned to the 4th Battalion, 1st Infantry Regiment, 1st Infantry Division, Army of the Republic of Vietnam (ARVN). Army Regulation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004612

    Original file (20140004612.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). His records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 7 March 1967 and he was awarded military occupational specialty 36C (lineman) upon completion of training.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 040006687C070208

    Original file (040006687C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his record be corrected to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). The Soldier must be an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties, must be assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat, and must actively participate in such ground combat. One of the applicant’s efficiency reports indicate that he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge, although there is no evidence to show that award.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 040005804C070208

    Original file (040005804C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence shows that the applicant was assigned to United States military units, e.g. 525th Military Intelligence Group and MACV Advisor Team 51, first as an intelligence analyst and later as an order of battle specialist in a G-2 Section of the 21st ARVN Infantry Division. The evidence shows that the applicant’s record contains administrative error that does not require action by the Board. The Case Management Support Division in St. Louis is requested to correct the applicant’s...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013286

    Original file (20080013286.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 23a, (Specialty Number and Title) of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows he held MOS 36K when he was released from active duty. There is no evidence in the applicant's service personnel records, and the applicant provided none, to show that he was reclassified to an infantry MOS or to another MOS while he served on active duty or while he served in Vietnam. To be entitled to award of the Combat Infantryman Badge, the evidence must show that an applicant held and served in an infantry...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017374

    Original file (20100017374.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He states he was assigned duties as a senior advisor with the U.S. Military Assistance Command, Vietnam (USMACV), with duty with the 4th Battalion, 49th Infantry, 25th Army of the Republic of Vietnam (ARVN) Division. He based his actions on an intelligence report that the VC again planned to attack the 4th Battalion. This regulation also stated the CIB was authorized for award to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry military occupational...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019521

    Original file (20140019521.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect: * both the applicant and Captain (CPT) Sxxx, his superior, were assigned to an advisory team for the purpose of coordinating artillery fire from nearby artillery units * CPT Sxxx and the applicant would sometimes accompany their counterparts in the Army of the Republic of Vietnam (ARVN) while on patrol * CPT Sxxx would act as a forward observer and the applicant was his radio operator (RTO) * on the morning of 31 December 1966, an ARVN Ranger Reconnaissance...