Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011399
Original file (20130011399.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  1 August 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130011399 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests relief from the 6-year barring statute and payment of her full retired pay entitlements effective 1 August 2001, the date she was placed on the Retired List.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, an incorrect pay multiplier was applied when she retired and she received an incorrect amount of retired pay until October 2011 when the error was discovered.  She was paid back pay for 6 years to 17 August 2005, but she has been denied the remainder of her back pay (61 months) due to the 6-year barring statute.

3.  The applicant provides copies of a letter from the Florida Army National Guard (FLARNG) advising her to apply to this Board, retirement orders (from Active Duty), and a letter from the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) advising her of the adjustment to her retired pay account. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was serving on active duty in pay grade E-7 in the FLARNG Active Guard Reserve Program when retirement orders were published by the FLARNG indicating that effective 31 July 2001 she had 16 years, 2 months, and 4 days of service under Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1405.  Additionally, she had 20 years and 23 days of service for basic pay purposes.

3.  On 31 July 2001, she was honorably retired at Fort Stewart, Georgia, and she was placed on the Retired List in pay grade E-7 effective 1 August 2001.  However, for reasons that are not readily apparent, the applicant's retired pay account was established as having 15 years, 7 months, and 24 days of service.

4.  On 12 June 2012, DFAS notified the applicant that her retired pay had been changed based on the change in her service computation under Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1405, and that she was being paid back pay for the past 6 years to 17 August 2005, less Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) deductions to 1 August 2001.

5.  The letter provided by the applicant from the FLARNG, dated 12 December 2012, states the applicant was one of many notified in 2011 that there was an error in their military pay accounts and who were not receiving full relief of monies owed due to DFAS having imposed the 6-year barring statute.  The letter advised the applicant to apply to this Board.

6.  Title 31, U.S. Code, section 3702, prohibits the payment of a claim against the U.S. Government unless the claim has been received within 6 years after the claim accrues.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  While it is not readily apparent whether the error occurred with the FLARNG or at Fort Stewart, the fact remains that the applicant's military pay account was incorrectly reported to DFAS at the time of her retirement and resulted in her being underpaid from 1 August 2001 until October 2011.

2.  DFAS paid the applicant back pay due her back to 17 August 2005; however, she is still due back pay from 1 August 2001 to 16 August 2005.

3.  One of the reasons behind the barring act is to relieve the U.S. Government of excessive paperwork and prevent stale, baseless claims which the U.S. Government cannot substantiate.  Given the applicant's 20+ years of service, she is certainly deserving of favorable consideration for her service to her country.  Further, documents verifying the applicant's entitlements are readily available.

4.  It is also noted that while DFAS imposed the barring act in her case, DFAS also charged the applicant with SBP premium costs retroactive to the date of her retirement.  In the interest of equity, if the U.S. Government is going to collect money it is owed for over 6 years, it should also pay money that it owes, especially since the error was through no fault of the individual concerned.  Accordingly, application of the barring statute is not appropriate in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

___x____  ____x___  ____x___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army and State ARNG records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing her military retired pay account was established at the time of her retirement on 1 August 2001 as having 16 years, 2 months, and 14 days of service under Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1405, as reflected on her retirement orders paying her all back pay due from that date, less any back pay already disbursed.



      _______ _   __x_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130011399





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130011399



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001435

    Original file (20130001435.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. The letter provided by the applicant from the FLARNG, dated 12 December 2012, states the applicant was one of many notified in 2011 that there was an error in their military pay accounts and who were not receiving full relief of monies owed due to DFAS having imposed the 6-year barring statute. As a result, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000837

    Original file (20130000837.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that she be granted relief from the 6-Year Barring Statute and that she be paid her full Retired Pay entitlements effective the date she was placed on the Retired List (1 May 2001). The letter provided by the applicant from the FLARNG is dated 12 December 2012 and indicates that the applicant was one of many notified in 2011 that there was an error in their military pay account and that they were not receiving full relief of monies owed due to DFAS having imposed the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001847

    Original file (20130001847.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests relief from the 6-year barring statute and payment of her full retired pay entitlements effective 1 March 2000, the date she was placed on the Retired List. The letter provided by the applicant from the FLARNG, dated 12 December 2012, states the applicant was one of many notified in 2011 that there was an error in their military pay accounts and who were not receiving full relief of monies owed due to DFAS having imposed the 6-year barring statute. As a result, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013841

    Original file (20130013841.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The letter provided by the applicant from the FLARNG, dated 12 December 2012, indicates the applicant was one of many notified in 2011 that there was an error in their military pay account and that they were not receiving full relief of monies owed due to DFAS imposing the 6-year barring statute. It is also noted that while DFAS imposed the Barring Act in his case, it charged the applicant with SBP costs retroactive back to the date of his retirement. As a result, the Board recommends that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000922

    Original file (20130000922.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests relief from the 6-year barring statute and payment of his full retired pay entitlements effective the date he was placed on the Retired List (1 September 2001). The letter provided by the applicant from the FLARNG, dated 12 December 2012, indicates the applicant was one of many who were notified in 2011 of an error in their military pay accounts and they were not receiving full relief of monies owed due to DFAS imposing the 6-year barring statute. As a result, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001770

    Original file (20130001770.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests relief from the 6-year barring statute and payment of his full retired pay entitlements effective the date he was placed on the Retired List (1 November 2003). The letter provided by the applicant from the FLARNG, dated 12 December 2012, indicates the applicant was one of many who were notified in 2011 that there was a error in their military pay accounts and they were not receiving full relief of monies owed due to DFAS imposing the 6-year barring statute. As a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001848

    Original file (20130001848.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests relief from the 6-year barring statute and payment of his full retired pay entitlements effective the date he was placed on the Retired List (1 July 1998). The letter provided by the applicant from the FLARNG, dated 12 December 2012, indicates the applicant was one of many who were notified in 2011 of an error in their military pay accounts and they were not receiving full relief of monies owed due to DFAS imposing the 6-year barring statute. As a result, the Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004873

    Original file (20130004873.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Retirement orders issued by the FLARNG on 27 October 2004 show the applicant had 22 years, 6 months, and 11 days of service under Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1405, effective 30 April 2001. The letter provided also indicates the applicant was one of many who were notified in 2011 of an error in their military pay accounts and who were not receiving full relief of monies owed due to DFAS imposing the 6-year barring statute. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000662

    Original file (20130000662.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). On 31 August 2011, DFAS notified the applicant that his retired pay had been adjusted based on the computation of his service and he was receiving back pay for the past 6 years to 22 June 2005. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing that at the time of his retirement on 1 September 2001, the applicant’s military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002812

    Original file (20130002812.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests relief from the 6-year barring statute and payment of his full retired pay entitlements effective the date he was placed on the Retired List (1 December 1999). The letter provided by the applicant from the FLARNG, dated 12 December 2012, indicates he was one of many who were notified in 2011 that there was a error in their military pay accounts and they were not receiving full relief of monies owed due to the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) imposing the...