Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011374
Original file (20130011374.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  5 March 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130011374 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.

2.  The applicant states he served on active duty from 22 June 1960 to 19 July 1963 without blemish.

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 22 June 1960 and he held military occupational specialty 732.10 (Disbursing Specialist). He was assigned to Fort Meade, MD.
3.  He was honorably released from active duty in the rank/grade of specialist four (SP4)/E-4 on 19 July 1963.  His DD Form 214 shows he completed 3 years and 28 days of active service with no lost time.  There are no awards or decorations listed on his DD Form 214.

4.  Special Orders (SO) Number 117, issued by Headquarters, 3rd Training Regiment, Fort Dix, NJ, on 8 August 1960 awarded him the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-1).

5.  SO Number 93, issued by Headquarters, Special Troops Regiment, Fort Meade, MD, on 2 April 1963, awarded him the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (Carbine).

6.  His record does not show he was awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal. Additionally, his record shows no derogatory information that would disqualify him for the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.  Furthermore, section 4 (Chronological Record of Military Service) of his DA Form 24 (Service Record) shows he received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his military service.

7.  Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service.  This period was 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ended with the termination of a period of Federal military service.  The enlisted person must have had all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings and no convictions by a court-martial.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the National Defense Service Medal is awarded for honorable active service for any period between 27 July 1950 and 27 July 1954, 1 January 1961 and 14 August 1974, 2 August 1990 and 30 November 1995, and 11 September 2001 and a date to be determined.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  There is no record of any derogatory information in the applicant's service record.  The evidence shows he served honorably from 22 June 1960 through 19 July 1963.  He attained the rank/grade of SP4/E-4, served a qualifying period of service, and received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his service with no record of disciplinary actions or a commander's disqualification.  Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) and correct his DD Form 214 to show this medal.
2.  He served a qualifying period of service for award of the National Defense Service Medal and he should also be entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show it.

3.  SO awarded him the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-1) and the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (Carbine).  Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show these badges. 

BOARD VOTE:

____X___  ____X___  ___X__ _  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

* awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 22 June 1960 through 21 June 1963
* adding to his DD Form 214 the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award), National Defense Service Medal, Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-1), and the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (Carbine)



      _______ _  X ______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130011374





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130011374



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016625

    Original file (20110016625.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A review of the applicant's records indicates he is entitled to additional awards which are not shown on his DD Form 214. The evidence of record shows he completed a qualifying period of service for award of the NDSM; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award. Awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 18 March 1960 and 17 March 1963; b. Amending item 24 of his DD Form 214 to add the: * Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018119

    Original file (20100018119.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Based on the available evidence, it would be appropriate to approve award of the Army Good Conduct Medal to the applicant and correct his records. The evidence of record shows the applicant qualified for award of the National Defense Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Army Good Conduct Medal (First Award) for exemplary conduct, efficiency, and fidelity from 21...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025804

    Original file (20100025804.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests award of the Army Good Conduct Medal, National Defense Service Medal, Army Service Ribbon, and Overseas Service Ribbon. Considering his frequent reassignments in the last 3 months of active duty it is reasonable to presume that the failure to recommend him for an award him the Army Good Conduct Medal was mere oversight. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020247

    Original file (20130020247.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the Unites States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he completed mechanic training and that he was awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal, Driver and Mechanic Badge, and Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Carbine and (M-1 and M-14) Rifle Bars. There is no evidence of record that shows the applicant completed mechanic training. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019045

    Original file (20110019045.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests: a. award of the Army Good Conduct Medal; and b. an expert marksmanship qualification badge be added to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). It stated that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940 and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011289

    Original file (20120011289.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This form further shows he was awarded the: * Army Good Conduct Medal (5th Award) * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device 1960 * Vietnam Service Medal * National Defense Service Medal (2nd Award) * Army Commendation Medal (2nd Award) 13. Therefore, his DD Form 214 for the period ending on 26 February 1969 should be corrected to show these unit awards. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120017304

    Original file (20120017304.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's record contains a DA Form 24 (Service Record) that shows in: * Section 4 (Chronological Record of Military Service) he received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his service * Section 9 (Medals, Decorations, and Citations) he was awarded the appropriate marksmanship badge for qualifying * marksman with the M-1 rifle * sharpshooter with the carbine rifle 7. The evidence of record shows the applicant served during a qualifying period of service for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005685

    Original file (20120005685.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show his second award of the Bronze Star Medal and award of the Meritorious Service Medal. There is no evidence of record and the applicant did not provide any evidence that shows he was recommended for or awarded the Bronze Star Medal by official orders. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from his DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008409

    Original file (20120008409.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His record contains four DD Forms 214. a. In light of his overall record of service, it would be appropriate to award him the AGCM (3rd Award) for this period and to correct his final DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. amending Headquarters, 83d Ordnance Battalion (Ammunition), General Orders Number 3, dated 7 March 1963, to show the period for the AGCM (2nd Award) as "28...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002827

    Original file (20140002827.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no record that his service in Vietnam is documented on his DD Form 214. The evidence of record shows he served a period of qualifying service for award of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214 by: a. adding award of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross...