Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011223
Original file (20130011223.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		
		BOARD DATE:	  1 April 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130011223 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the period he served in Vietnam as 13 March 1971 through 29 January 1972.

2.  The applicant states the beginning date of the Vietnam service shown on his DD Form 214 should be 13 March 1971 instead of 13 March 1972.  He did not notice the typographical error until recently.

3.  The applicant provides:

* his DD Form 214
* Headquarters, First U.S. Army, Fort George G. Meade, MD, Special Orders Number 40, dated 9 February 1971
* Headquarters, U.S. Army Personnel Center, Oakland, CA, Special Orders Number 072, dated 13 March 1971

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 1 September 1970.

3.  Item 31 (Foreign Service) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows his service in Vietnam from 13 March 1971 through 29 January 1972.

4.  On 17 August 1973, he was honorably released from active duty after completing 2 years, 11 months, and 17 days of active service during this period.

5.  Item (30 Remarks) of his DD Form 214 shows the entry:  "Vietnam Service from 13Mar72 thru 29Jan72  Indochina Yes  Korea NO."

6.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, stated to indicate Indochina and Korea service performed on or after 5 August 1964 in item 30 of the DD Form 214 by entering inclusive dates of service for Vietnam and indicating "yes" or "no" for service in Indochina and Korea.  To show Vietnam service only, for example, enter "Vietnam -- 25 Apr 70 through 28 May 71, Indochina -- yes, Korea -- no."

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The applicant's DD Form 214 erroneously shows he served in Vietnam from 13 March 1972 through 29 January 1972.  The evidence of record shows he served in Vietnam from 13 March 1971 through 29 January 1972.  Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show these dates of service.

BOARD VOTE:

__X______  __X______  __X___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  deleting the entry "Vietnam Service from 13Mar72 thru 29Jan72 Indochina Yes Korea NO" from item 30 of his DD Form 214 and

	b.  replacing it with the entry "Vietnam -- 13 Mar 71 through 29 Jan 72, Indochina -- yes, Korea -- no."



      __________X_______________
                  CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130011223



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130011223



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003912

    Original file (20110003912.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * his DD Form 214 * pages 3 and 4 of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Item 31 (Foreign Service) of his DA Form 20 shows he served in Vietnam from 25 January 1972 through 4 October 1972. It states that for: a. item 22c, enter total active duty outside continental limits of the United States for the period covered by the DD Form 214 and the last oversea theater in which service was performed, e.g., "Foreign and/or Sea...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014850

    Original file (20130014850.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) does not show award of the Purple Heart or the CIB. There are no orders in the applicant’s service personnel records that show he was awarded the Purple Heart. Additionally, Appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam (USARV) Regulation 672-1 states that during the Vietnam era the Combat Infantryman Badge was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002103

    Original file (20130002103.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    c. Item 24 shows he was authorized one overseas service bar; however, he served in Vietnam for three 6-month periods during this period of service. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show he was authorized three overseas service bars. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of this DD Form 214 to show he was authorized three overseas service bars.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013351

    Original file (20110013351.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 22c of the DD Form 214 issued on 24 November 1971 shows 2 years, 4 months, and 19 days of foreign service and shows he served with U.S. Army Vietnam (USARV). The evidence of record shows the applicant was issued two DD Forms 214. The applicant is advised that he must present both of his DD Forms 214 and any associated DD Forms 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) when he is required to provide documentation of his RA service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100030338

    Original file (20100030338.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 22 (Statement of Service), block c (Foreign and/or Sea Service), shows he served in USARV for 4 years, 5 months, and 3 days; c. Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) shows the National Defense Service Medal, Meritorious Unit Commendation, Vietnam Service Medal with one silver service star, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with (1960) Device, and six Overseas Service Bars. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015523

    Original file (20130015523.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) for the period ending 4 December 1974 to show two tours of duty in Vietnam, one tour in Korea, and that he was awarded or authorized the: * Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) * National Defense Service Medal (NDSM) * Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) * Korea Defense Service Medal (KDSM) * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) (VCM) * Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Machine...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026008

    Original file (20100026008.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) to show his service in Korea. Item 30 (Remarks) of his DD Form 214 shows the entry "Vietnam 25Apr68 thru 2Nov67 & 12Apr70 thru 13May71, Indochina-No, Korea-No." Although the applicant's record confirms he served in Korea between 6 January 1960 and 7 January 1961, by regulation the requirement to show service in Korea in item 30 of his DD Form 214 applied only to such...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003906

    Original file (20150003906.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's record contains two DD Forms 214. d. The evidence shows, during this period of service he served in Vietnam from 5 December 1969 to 13 March 1970, which equals a total of 0 years, 3 months, and 09 days of Vietnam service during the period covered by this DD Form 214. e. Army Regulation 635-5, paragraph 2-50b(18) states item 30 of the DD Form 214 should indicate Indochina and Korea service on or after 5 August 1964. Item 17c of this DD Form 214 properly shows he reenlisted...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000648

    Original file (20120000648.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    It shows he departed Vietnam on 30 April 1969. When the applicant was released from active duty, the regulation governing preparation of the DD Form 214 did not require an entry specifying service in Vietnam, but it did require entry of the last overseas theater in which service was performed in item 22c. A later revision of the regulation governing preparation of the DD Form 214 provided for recording Vietnam service in the Remarks section of the form.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004156

    Original file (20130004156.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his dates of service in Vietnam and award of both Vietnam service medals (taken to mean the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) and Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Campaign Medal with Device (1960)). His DD Form 214 does not show his dates of service in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...