Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010501
Original file (20130010501 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  18 March 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130010501 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests disenrollment from the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) and reimbursement of all payments made to date.

2.  The applicant states that upon out-processing at Fort Carson on or about 8 August 2012, he and his wife signed a DD Form 2656 declining SBP enrollment at the transition point.  Upon noticing the SBP payments on his first monthly retiree statement, he contacted the official at the Fort Carson Transition Point and was told the original of the DD Form 2656 was forwarded to the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) and he was given a copy.  The transition point did not have a copy and he has been unable to locate his copy.  Officials at DFAS claim they never received the DD Form 2656.  Accordingly, he requests disenrollment from the SBP and reimbursement for all premiums paid.

3.  The applicant provides two DA Forms 2626-2 (SBP Termination Request), letters requesting disenrollment from himself and his spouse, and a letter from DFAS.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 20 August 1991.  He completed his training and remained on active duty through a series of reenlistments.  On 17 December 2012, he was honorably retired in pay grade E-7 due to disability, temporary (enhanced).  He completed 21 years, 3 months, and 28 days of active service and was placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List effective 18 December 2012.

2.  A review of the applicant's official records failed to show any SBP elections made by him.

3.  On 24 April 2013, DFAS notified the applicant that they could not terminate his participation in the SBP as there was no DD Form 2656 on file.  He was advised to apply to the Board.

4.  Public Law 99-145, enacted 8 November 1985 but effective 1 March 1986, required a spouse's written concurrence for a retiring member's election that provided less than maximum spouse SBP coverage.

5.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1448 provides that effective 1 March 1986, a married member is enrolled with spouse coverage on full retired pay at the time of retirement unless that spouse has concurred in writing to another election requested by the member pursuant to Department of Defense Financial Management Regulation, volume 7B, chapter 43.  When the spouse's concurrence is required, the signature indicating concurrence must be corroborated by one or more witnesses.

6.  Public Law 105-85, enacted 18 November 1997, established the option to terminate SBP participation.  Retirees have a 1-year period, beginning on the second anniversary of the date on which their retired pay started to withdraw from the SBP.  The spouse's concurrence is required.  No premiums will be refunded to those who opt to disenroll.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant claims he and his spouse signed a DD Form 2656 electing not to participate in the SBP; however, the applicant has not provided such a form and DFAS contends that none was received.  Consequently, he was automatically enrolled in the SBP with full coverage in accordance with laws and regulations in effect at the time.  Accordingly, there was no error or injustice in this case.

2.  The applicant's contention that the DD Form 2656 completed by him and his spouse was forwarded to DFAS by the transition point at the time of his retirement was carefully considered.  Inasmuch as the form was not received by DFAS, automatic enrollment occurs.  While the sincerity of his claim is not in doubt, without a copy of the form in question or independent evidence such as a statement from the transition point official personally involved in both executing the form and transmitting it to DFAS, there is no way to verify that such was the case.  In any event, the applicant still has the option of withdrawing from the SBP during the 1-year period beginning on the second anniversary of the date on which his retired pay started.

3.  Since he failed to provide sufficient evidence to show he and his spouse opted out of participation in the SBP and he has the option of terminating his SBP participation beginning on the second anniversary of the date on which his retired pay started, provided his spouse concurs, there appears to be no basis to grant his requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ____x___  ____x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130010501



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130010501



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012267

    Original file (20110012267.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows that prior to his retirement on 31 December 2010, the applicant and his wife elected to decline participation in the SBP with a duly witnessed and notarized DD Form 2656, dated 21 December 2010. In the interest of equity and justice, his records should be corrected to show he elected not to participate in the SBP with his spouse's concurrence prior to the date of his retirement. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012738

    Original file (20130012738.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he declined participation in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) at the time he was placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL). Public Law 99-145, enacted 8 November 1985 but effective 1 March 1986, required a spouse's written concurrence for a retiring member's election that provided less than maximum spouse SBP coverage. The applicant claims he and his spouse signed a DD Form 2656 electing not to participate in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021300

    Original file (20110021300.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Three options are available: (A) elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation; (B) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60 but delay payment of it until the date of the member's 60th birthday; (C) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before age 60. Public Law 106-398, dated 30 October 2000, requires that upon receipt of the 20-year letter, a qualified Reserve Component member who is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018353

    Original file (20140018353.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Section XI (Certification) item 30 (Member) states, "Also, I have been counseled that I can terminate SBP participation, with my spouse's written concurrence, within 1-year after the second anniversary of commencement of retired pay. He provided a DD Form 2656-2 requesting termination of his SBP coverage. The evidence of record shows the applicant submitted a DD Form 2656 wherein he elected to participate in the SBP for spouse/children based on the full amount in the presence of an RSO counselor.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007149

    Original file (20090007149.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He argues that he clearly elected not to participate in the SBP on the DD Form 2656 and his spouse concurred. If the applicant elects to terminate his SBP participation at that time, he is advised that despite his action, the Reserve Component premium add-on will be deducted from his retired pay for life. He is further advised that in his particular case, he can withdraw from the SBP during a 1-year window beginning in December 2010, the second anniversary of his receipt of retired pay,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005154

    Original file (20130005154.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel), dated 27 February 2013 * DD Form 2656-6 (SBP Election Change Certificate), dated 27 February 2013 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) records do not show the applicant made an election to participate or decline participation in the SBP prior to her retirement and as a result, her coverage defaulted to automatic spouse coverage. The applicant completed a DD Form 2656 on 27...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011948

    Original file (20120011948.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Based on the foregoing, there is insufficient evidence to grant the applicant's request for terminating enrollment in the SBP in this case. However, he is not precluded from exercising his option to disenroll from the SBP with his wife's notarized concurrence during the 1-year period following the second anniversary of receipt of his retired pay without repayment of premiums.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001913

    Original file (20150001913.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * he never received a 20-year letter because he had issues with his retirement points and active time * after his points were corrected, he still did not receive a 20-year letter and was thus not given an opportunity to make an election * once he became retirement eligible, his retirement orders were issued in 2013 and backdated to 2006 * at the time of his retirement, he completed a DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel) * he was not married; he placed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013326

    Original file (20110013326.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides a Retirement Account Statement, dated 26 May 2011, which indicates the applicant has spouse and children SBP coverage. The evidence of record confirms the applicant was informed of the requirement to attend an SBP briefing in her retirement orders which were issued just over 10 months prior to her retirement. As a result, since it was the applicant’s failure to attend a briefing or to follow up on information she received if she did attend a briefing that resulted in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011716

    Original file (20080011716.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he elected not to participate in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) with his spouse's concurrence. By doing so, he also acknowledged he had been counseled that he can terminate SBP participation, with his spouse's written concurrence, within one year after the second anniversary of commencement of retired pay. Completion of Section XI (SBP Spouse Concurrence) of DD Form 2656 is required when a service member is married and...