IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 26 September 2013
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130010480
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests reinstatement as a promotable master sergeant, be allowed to graduate with class number 63 of the U.S. Army Sergeants Major Academy (USASMA), and be allowed to continue on his assignment as a Command Selection List candidate for 2014. He further requests removal of a DA Form 1059 (Academic Evaluation Report), dated 26 February 2013; General Officer Memorandum of Reprimand (GOMOR); and all other derogatory material from his records.
2. The applicant states he was dismissed from the USASMA for committing a class C misdemeanor (disorderly conduct), which is a minor infraction punishable by fine only. He goes on to state that out of 647 students at the USASMA he is certain that many have been served with greater offenses than class C misdemeanors and even after the installation Judge Advocate General (JAG) officer recommended they exercise their power in accordance with Army Regulation 350-1, paragraph 3-14e(2), the commandant disregarded the recommendation and dismissed him from the USASMA. Accordingly, he desires the Board to evaluate the hasty actions by the commandant and reverse the actions that have occurred as a result of his decision.
3. The applicant provides:
* three pages of explanation of his application
* a memorandum of support from his legal assistance attorney
* a copy of an incident report
* counseling forms
* his dismissal from the USASMA
* his court documents regarding his sentence
* his appeal of his dismissal
* his DA Form 1059
* recommendations from his chain of command and his appeal
* a copy of the Fiscal Year 2014 Command Sergeants Major (CSM) Command Slating List (CSL)
* third-party letters of support
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. After serving in the U.S. Navy, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 17 August 1989. He remained on active duty through a series of continuous reenlistments and he was promoted to the pay grade of E-8 on 1 August 2006.
2. On 29 January 2013, the applicant was notified he was being considered for dismissal from the USASMA due to his willful discharge of a firearm within city limits.
3. The applicant appealed the dismissal; however, on 26 February 2013, he was dismissed from the USASMA (Class 63) for misconduct. He was issued a DA Form 1059 indicating he failed to achieve course standards.
4. Although the applicant has not provided and his official records do not contain a copy of his GOMOR, his record contains a memorandum, subject: Administrative Memorandum of Reprimand Filing Determination, (applicant's name), USASMA, Fort Bliss, TX, dated 21 March 2013, wherein the commanding general directed the GOMOR be filed in his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF), now known as the Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR).
5. The applicant signed his application to the Board on 17 May 2013 and
Class 63 of the USASMA graduated on 21 June 2013.
6. Army Regulation 600-37 (Unfavorable Information) sets forth the basic authority for filing of unfavorable information in the AMHRR. It provides, in pertinent part, that a nonpunitive MOR or admonition would be filed in the AMHRR only when directed by a general officer senior to the recipient or by direction of the officer having general court-martial jurisdiction of the recipient.
7. Army Regulation 350-1 (Army Training and Leader Development) provides in pertinent part, in paragraph 3-14 that students may be dismissed from courses for inappropriate personal conduct. No formal adjudication of guilt by a military or civilian court or by a commander is necessary to support dismissal under this paragraph. Students will be counseled by their chain of command and afforded the opportunity to submit an appeal of the dismissal action within 7 days of the dismissal action. Dismissals for misconduct will be recorded on the individuals DA Form 1059.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. Although not presently filed in his AMHRR, the GOMOR was properly imposed in compliance with applicable regulations and it was properly directed to be filed in the performance section of his AMHRR.
2. Additionally, his DA Form 1059 is properly filed in the performance section of his AMHRR.
3. The applicants contention that he was unjustly dismissed from the USASMA has been noted and appears to lack merit. The applicant has failed to show through the evidence submitted and the evidence of record that his dismissal from the USASMA was in violation of Army regulations or that the commandant did not have the authority to dismiss him for his misconduct.
4. In fact, the available evidence shows that his dismissal was accomplished in accordance with the applicable regulation with no indication of any violations of the applicants rights.
5. While the applicant contends his offense did not warrant dismissal from the course, he has failed to provide sufficient evidence to show he was treated differently than others under similar circumstances. Therefore, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
____X____ ____X____ ____X____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
____________X___________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20130010480
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20130010480
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012725
On 8 January 2013, by memorandum, an official at HRC Promotions Branch notified the applicant that as a result of his failure to meet the NCOES requirements of Army Regulation 600-8-19 (Enlisted Promotions and Reductions), paragraph 1-27b(2), his promotion orders to the rank/grade of SGM/E-9 have been revoked, effective 7 February 2012 and with a date of rank of 1 January 2004. b. Paragraph 1-27 (NCOES requirements for promotion and conditional promotions), a Soldier must be a USASMC...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004108
The applicant requests removal of the following documents from his Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR) (formerly known as the Official Military Personnel File): * general officer memorandum of reprimand (GOMOR), dated 23 April 1998 * DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report (AER)), dated 24 April 1998 2. The GOMOR was correctly filed. The AER was filed in the applicant's AMHRR together with his acknowledgement and associated documents.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060003662C070205
However, the WAARNG had discharge orders transferring him to the IRR. Yet, their State had discharge orders transferring him to the IRR. The evidence shows the applicant had been given two deferments for attendance of Phase II of the USASMA.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003518
The applicant requests removal of a DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report) for his attendance at the U.S. Army Sergeants Major Academy (USASMA) Non-Resident Course (NRC) during the period 1 April 2006 to 20 June 2008 from his official military personnel file (OMPF). On 10 April 2007, the applicant requested to withdraw from the USASMA NRC. He was academically deficient and he was not making sufficient progress toward successful completion of Phase 1 of the course.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075703C070403
He then chose combat lifesavers, completed his paper, submitted it to his FA for comments, made corrections, and turned it in for final grading. Army Regulation 351-1, Individual Military Education and Training, The applicant, on 27 November 2000, completed a staff study entitled "Shortage of Combat Lifesavers" using a prescribed school format for such studies.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008619
The applicant provides: * DA Form 1559 (Inspector General (IG) Action Request) * Letter from the Office of the IG, U.S. Army Civil Affairs and Psychological Operations Command (Airborne) (USACAPOC(A)), Fort Bragg, NC * Request for disenrollment from USASMA Class Number 35 with chain of command endorsements * Transfer to the Retired Reserve orders CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. d. Although he requested a deferment to a subsequent class it was just a request. He argues that he submitted a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022398
A memorandum from the commandant of the USASMA, dated 28 April 2008, shows a DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report) was prepared showing the applicant failed to achieve course standards and was dismissed from Phase I, NR-SMC effective 28 April 2008. It states that operational deferments will only be granted for unit deployments. There is no evidence in the available record and the applicant has not provided sufficient evidence to show that he requested a course deferment...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018903
A comment on the form states she met academic requirements but failed to meet body fat composition standards during the course in accordance with Army Regulation 600-9 (The Army Weight Control Program). The available records do not include a DA Form 5501 documenting the measurements that served as the basis for determining she did not meet height/weight standards while attending the SLC. Other than her own statements, there is no evidence of error in the determination that she did not meet...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120017559
The applicant states: * his AER was marked "marginally achieved course standards" because he was charged with a driving under the influence (DUI) for which a General Officer Memorandum of Reprimand (GOMOR) was issued * the Department of Army Suitability Evaluation Board (DASEB) transferred the GOMOR to the restricted portion of his AMHRR after his second appeal * he was never convicted of DUI and he met all of his academic requirements as the comments clearly state * when the AER was...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091491C070212
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. On 9 June 2003, the applicant submitted an application to the Army Board for Corrections of Military Records (ABCMR) requesting amendment to DA Form 1059 to reflect that he satisfactorily completed BNCOC 98-05. The evidence of record shows the applicant submitted driving record transcripts from the State of Virginia showing no history of DUI as additional evidence and a copy of Periodic...