Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010442
Original file (20130010442.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF: 

		BOARD DATE:	  6 February 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130010442 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests amendment of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show a reentry eligibility (RE) code which would allow her to enlist in the Air National Guard.

2.  The applicant states she is an Army veteran who served 7 years and 6 months of active duty service.  She is currently a police officer with the Jacksonville Sheriff's Office and has served her city in this capacity for 8 years and 8 months.  She would like to continue her military service and be able to retire.  She was discharged with disability severance pay.  She contends she no longer has a disability and would like to have her RE code 3 changed to a code that would allow her to enlist into the Air National Guard.  In the current Air National Guard regulation, applicants with prior military service and an RE code 3 are not qualified for entry.

3.  The applicant provides:

* DD Form 214 for the period ending 3 May 2000
* letter from her physician, dated 30 May 2013

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  On 30 September 1998, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army with almost 3 years of prior active duty service.

3.  The applicant's DD Form 214 shows:

	a.  she was discharged on 3 May 2000;

	b.  her character of service was honorable;

	c.  the authority and reason for her discharge was Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation), paragraph 
4-24b(3), due to disability with severance pay;

	d.  her separation program designator (SPD) code was JFL; and

	e.  she was assigned an RE code 3.

4.  The letter provided by the applicant's physician states the applicant had a physical examination on 30 May 2013 and was found to be within normal limits.  The physician stated the applicant may return to work.

5.  Army Regulation 601-210 (Active and Reserve Components Enlistment Program) prescribes eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing in the Regular Army, U.S. Army Reserve, and Army National Guard.  Chapter 3 prescribes basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment and includes a list of Armed Forces RE codes.  RE code 3 applies to persons separated from their last period of service with a waivable disqualification.  

6.  Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator Codes) provides the specific authorities and reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214.  The SPD code JFL was the appropriate code for Soldiers separating under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 4-24b(3), due to disability with severance pay.  Additionally, the SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table establishes RE code 3 as the proper RE code to assign to Soldiers for this reason.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that her RE code should be amended because she no longer has a physical disability.

2.  The RE code 3 establishing her ineligibility for enlistment/reenlistment without waiver was correctly entered on her DD Form 214 in accordance with governing regulations.

3.  There is no apparent basis for removal or waiver of the applicant's disqualification that established the basis for the RE code 3.

4.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ___X___  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X____________
                  CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130010442



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130010442



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004494

    Original file (20110004494.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the correct: * Separation Code * Reentry (RE) Code * Period of inactive duty * Period in the Delayed Entry Program 2. The regulation provides that prior to discharge or release from active duty individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The SPD code of "JFL" was the appropriate code for the applicant based on the guidance...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023448

    Original file (20100023448.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states her discharge is correct, but the RE code is incorrect. The evidence of record shows that when the SPD is "JFL," the Soldier's RE code should be "3." ____________X_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008257

    Original file (20100008257.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The "JFL" SPD code is the correct code for Soldiers separating (involuntarily) under chapter 4 of Army Regulation 635-40 by reason of disability. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by changing his RE code from 4 to 3.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010372

    Original file (20080010372.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) show that he was separated from the Army in accordance with Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 4-24b(3), disability, severance pay, with a Separation Code of "JFL" and a RE Code of "3." His DD Form 214 stated that he was separated from the Army in accordance with Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 4-24b(3), disability, severance pay, with a Separation Code JFL and a RE Code of 3. Pertinent Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018611

    Original file (20140018611.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was issued an RE code of "3" with a separation code of "JFL" when he was separated, which precludes him from reentering military service. It shows the SPD code of "JFL" is the appropriate code to assign Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 4-24b(3), based on separation for physical disability with severance pay. The evidence of record shows the applicant was found physically unfit for continued military service based on a disability that was rated...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002429

    Original file (20130002429.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The DD Form 214 issued to the applicant confirms she was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation), chapter 4, by reason of disability with severance pay, non-combat (enhanced). Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090183C070212

    Original file (2003090183C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The Board also carefully considered the supporting doctor’s letter provided by the applicant that indicates that he is now physically able to perform active duty service. In view of the circumstances in this case, the Board finds the RE-3 code was appropriately assigned based on the authority and reason for the applicant’s discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008597

    Original file (20090008597.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This regulation provides that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or reason for discharge. The SPD/RE Code Cross-Reference Table indicates that a RE Code of 3 will be applied when the separation code is "JFL." The applicant's separation code of "JFL" is consistent with the basis for her separation; however, the applicable regulation states, in pertinent part, that a RE code of "3" is appropriate when the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029944

    Original file (20100029944.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to change his reentry eligibility (RE) code from 3 to 1. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The evidence of record confirms the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 2-24b(3), by reason of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023029

    Original file (20110023029.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Army Regulation 40-501, paragraph 3-45 states Soldiers will be referred to an MEB after an episode of heat stroke or exertional rhabdomyolysis.