Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010363
Original file (20130010363.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
 
		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	    18 July 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130010363 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests a memorandum, dated 9 February 1999, for disqualification of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) and related files be removed from her Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR) (formerly known as the Official Military Personnel File).

2.  The applicant states:

	a.  in 1999, she was disapproved for the AGCM for the period 1 October 1995 through 30 September 1998, but she later received the AGCM for the same period in 2000.

	b.  the disqualification memorandum for the AGCM is in her AMHRR along with the orders awarding her the AGCM.  This discrepancy makes her record for the promotion board incorrect.  She doesn't know if she should or should not be wearing the AGCM.

	c.  she believes the disqualification memorandum should not have been issued.  She was disqualified because of a physical training failure and the regulations on the memorandum have nothing to do with the disqualification of an AGCM.




	d.  there are inconsistencies in the documents.  She was not aware of the documents until after the release of the Sergeant First Class results for Fiscal Year 2013.  She has been in the Army for 17 years and has been doing everything she needs to do in order to get promoted.  As long as the documents are in her file, her Enlisted Record Brief (ERB), her AMHRR, and board files will be incorrect. 

3.  The applicant provides:

* Disqualification memorandum, dated 9 February 1999, and related document
* Permanent Orders 151-00024, dated 30 May 2000, for the first award of the AGCM
* ERB   

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant's enlistment contract shows she enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) on 2 October 1995.  She has remained on active duty through continuous reenlistments.  

2.  She provides a memorandum, dated 9 February 1999, which shows:

* she was disqualified for the AGCM for the period 1 October 1995 through 
30 September 1998 for failing a record Army Physical Fitness Test       (APFT)
* she elected not to make a statement

3.  She provides an undated letter which states:

* the disqualification was approved by her command
* the disqualification and endorsements will be placed in her AMHRR

4.  She also provided Permanent Orders 151-00024, dated 30 May 2000, which show she received the first award of the AGCM for the period 2 October 1995 through 1 October 1998.

5.  She was promoted to staff sergeant on 1 April 2007.

6.  A review of the restricted section of her AMHRR in the interactive Personnel Electronic Records Management System revealed a copy of the disqualification memorandum, dated 9 February 1999, and related letter.  The performance section of her AMHRR revealed a copy of Permanent Orders 151-00024, dated 30 May 2000.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8- 2 (Suspension of Favorable Personnel Actions (Flag)) states a Flag will be initiated when a Soldier fails a record APFT and the Flag will be removed on the date the Soldier passes the record APFT.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  By the applicant's own admission, she was flagged at the time for failing an APFT.  Once she passed the APFT, the Flag was lifted and she was awarded the AGCM retroactively.

2.  Since she received the first award of the AGCM for the period 2 October 1995 through 1 October 1998, it is reasonable to presume the disqualification memorandum and related letter no longer has a purpose and that it is in the best interest of the Army to remove this documentation from her AMHRR.

BOARD VOTE:

___X____  ___X___  ___X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by removing the disqualification memorandum, dated 9 February 1998, and related letter from her AMHRR.


      ___________X____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130010363





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130010363



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150004532

    Original file (20150004532.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides policy, criteria, and administrative instructions concerning military awards and decorations. The applicant contends his request for removal of the AGCM disqualification documents that are filed in his OMPF should be reconsidered because he was not notified of or given the opportunity to respond to the commander's proposed disqualification action and he subsequently received the AGCM for the cited period of service. The evidence of record...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075297C070403

    Original file (2002075297C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Paragraph 7-8f of the same regulation states the physical profiles for Reservist not on active duty may be accomplished by the Army Reserve Personnel Command (AR-PERSCOM) staff surgeons, medical corps commander of USAR hospitals, or the Surgeon, AR-PERSCOM without a physical profile board (PPBD). Army Regulation 635-40 governs the evaluation for physical fitness of soldiers who may be unfit to perform their military duties because of physical disability. It states that soldiers when found...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000213

    Original file (20150000213.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states his OMPF contains a disqualification statement for award of the AGCM, dated 19 November 1997; however, he was awarded the AGCM for the period 25 July 1996 to 24 July 1999 on 4 February 2000, so he doesn't understand why the memorandum is still in his records. His OMPF contains this disqualification memorandum. Absent any evidence of error or injustice in the AGCM disqualification process, there is not a sufficiently compelling reason to remove the AGCM disqualification...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001066112C070421

    Original file (2001066112C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT STATES : That she received a profile to take an alternate Army physical fitness test (APFT) and her command refused to give it to her. The applicant failed her first APFT in May 2000 and it appears she failed one or two other, non-record APFTs before a second record APFT failure in September 2000. She provides no evidence to show that she sought medical attention to discover if her thyroid condition or any medical condition could have been the reason for her APFT failures.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013460

    Original file (20070013460.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A USAHRC-STL memorandum, dated 13 April 2005, shows that the applicant was selected for promotion to 1LT by an Administrative Promotion Board that convened on 31 March 2005. USAHRC-STL Orders B-05-501580, dated 9 May 2005, show that the applicant was promoted to 1LT effective 18 April 2005, with a date of rank of 18 April 2005. Based on her date of rank of 18 April 2005 and completion of 5 years time in the lower grade, the applicant's promotion eligibility date (PED) for CPT is 17 April 2010.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040009761C070208

    Original file (20040009761C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Counsel also provides Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) Proceedings, Docket Number AC98-09329/AR1999016304 dated 14 January 1999, in which the ABCMR awarded the applicant in that case the AGCM because he had never been disqualified for the award by his chain of command. In the NCOER for the period ending April 1996, her rater gave her a "No" rating in Part IVa2 with one negative supporting comment. Unit commanders are authorized to award the AGCM to enlisted personnel...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014287

    Original file (20130014287.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) governs the evaluation of physical fitness of Soldiers who may be unfit to perform their military duties because of physical disability. The Army must find that a service member is physically unfit to reasonably perform his or her duties and assign an appropriate disability rating before that service member can be medically separated or retired. The evidence of record confirms the applicant did not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080002326

    Original file (20080002326.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that her Noncommissioned Officer Evaluation Report (NCOER) (DA Form2166-7) for the period from August 1999 through May 2000, be removed from her Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). Enclosures to this appeal included, in part, a photo copy of her Army Physical Fitness Test Card showing her last APFT on 10 March 1999; her promotion orders to sergeant, pay grade E-5, with an effective date and date of rank of 1 August 1999; signed, but undated, copy of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021838

    Original file (20130021838.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests the removal of documents from the performance folder of his Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR), formerly known as the Official Military Personnel File, pertaining to disqualification for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM). The documents in question are undated and indicate the unit commander disqualified him for the 2nd award of the AGCM for the period...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019365

    Original file (20130019365.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 21 November 2013 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130019365 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests removal of a memorandum disqualifying her for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) from her Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR).