Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010002
Original file (20130010002.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	 

		BOARD DATE:	    16 January 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130010002


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests reconsideration of his earlier request for award of the Purple Heart for wounds incurred during World War II (WWII).

2.  The applicant states:

* during the Battle of the Bulge, when he suspects a metal fragment entered his knee, the vast majority of Soldiers would not leave the line unless they were seriously wounded
* many Soldiers had severe cold weather injuries, himself included, and they refused to seek aid which would have required them to leave their buddies
* as a Platoon Leader, he refused to leave his men
* had he been aware, at the time, that a metal fragment had entered his knee, he seriously doubts he would have sought medical treatment – the frostbite on his legs was painful but he refused to leave the line or his men
* the remainder of his military career and civilian employment was uneventful, and nothing that occurred after his service in WWII could account for the metal fragment in his knee
* it is his firm belief that there is no other explanation for the fragment in his knee than the constant shelling he was exposed to from German artillery and mortars during the Battle of the Bulge

3.  The applicant provides no additional evidence in support of his request.


CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the ABCMR in Docket Number AR20120016976, dated 28 March 2013.

2.  Although the applicant provides no new evidence in support of his request, he did submit a new argument that was not previously considered by the Board; therefore, this new argument will now be considered by the Board.

3.  The applicant entered active duty, as a member of the Army of the United States, on 14 July 1942.  He served in the European – African – Middle Eastern Theater of Operations from 28 October 1944 through 28 November 1945.  He served as a commissioned officer throughout his service during WWII, attaining the rank of captain (CPT).  

4.  On 1 March 1946, he was honorably discharged from the Army.  His WD AGO Form 53-98 (Military Record and Report of Separation - Certificate of Service) shows in:

* Item 29 (Decorations and Citations), no entry to show he was awarded the Purple Heart
* Item 30 (Wounds Received in Action) contains the entry "None"

5.  On 14 February 1947, he was commissioned as a Reserve commissioned officer of the Army for service in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR).  On 31 January 1962, he was honorably retired in the rank of major. 

6.  His available record is void of any documentation that references either combat wounds or injuries incurred or treated during his service in WWII, or an award of the Purple Heart.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded to a member of the Armed Forces of the United States who, while serving in any capacity with one of the U.S. Armed Services after 5 April 1917, has been wounded or killed or who has died or may die after being wounded in any action against an enemy of the United States.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.



DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends the conditions during the Battle of the Bulge were so extreme that no man, unless seriously injured, would consider seeking treatment for wounds he may have received, which if treated and recorded, would have resulted in his receipt of the Purple Heart.  He further contends he, as well as the other men under his charge, placed the welfare of those around them before their own personal safety, and their devotion to their fellow Soldiers would not let them leave the line.  History records these noble characteristics are often present in men trying to survive the horrors of battle.

2.  Unfortunately, the applicant cannot state with absolute certainty that the metal fragment in his knee resulted from an enemy artillery or mortar round.  He contends it could not have come from anything else; yet, there is no definitive proof it came from the enemy.  More importantly, such wounds must have required medical treatment at the time.  He acknowledges he did not receive treatment.

3.  Unfortunately, the governing Army regulations require specific proof that confirms he was wounded in combat, his wounds required medical treatment, and such treatment was made a matter of official record.  

4.  Regrettably, there is an insufficient basis to grant relief in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X____  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case 




are insufficient as a basis to amend the decision of the ABCMR set forth in Docket Number AR20120016976, dated 28 March 2013.




      ___________X____________
                 CHAIRPERSON

I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090012380



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130010002



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018191

    Original file (20140018191.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. PFC GPC noticed that PFC JPD had a mortar in his hands and told him that he should leave the mortar alone; however, PFC JPD ignored him. SFC WBA took the empty canister...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006501

    Original file (20090006501.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that he was wounded in action multiple times but was never awarded the Purple Heart. However, there is insufficient evidence to grant him the Purple Heart in this case. Regrettably, absent evidence which conclusively shows that the applicant sustained wounds or injuries as a result of hostile action, that he was treated by medical personnel for those wounds or injuries, and that this treatment was made a matter of official record, there is insufficient basis for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057275C070420

    Original file (2001057275C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. However, there is no evidence in the available record nor has the applicant submitted any evidence to show that he was wounded as a result of hostile action by enemy force.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005768

    Original file (20080005768.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 34 (Wounds Received in Action), of the WD AGO Form 53-55, shows the entry "None" to indicate the applicant was not wounded while he served in the Asiatic-Pacific Theater. There are no orders or evidence in the applicant’s available records that show he was awarded the Purple Heart. There is no evidence of record, and the applicant has provided insufficient evidence, which shows that he was awarded the Purple Heart or that he was wounded or treated for wounds as a result of hostile...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026430

    Original file (20100026430.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    No combat injuries or wounds are recorded on his medical records; however, an entry "scar to left leg" was entered on his Standard Form 88 (Report of Medical Examination). In this case, the applicant's name is not shown on the Vietnam casualty roster, his DA Form 20 is not available for review, his service record is void of any orders that show he was awarded the Purple Heart, his record is void of any official Army telegrams or Western Union telegrams, and there is no conclusive evidence...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012640

    Original file (20090012640.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The incident described by the applicant fits the regulatory examples of enemy-related injuries which clearly justify award of the Purple Heart, particularly the example of injury received in action and caused by an enemy placed mine or trap. Notwithstanding the additional information provided by the applicant’s Member of Congress and Colonel D___, there is no contemporaneous evidence that shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action. Regrettably, absent evidence which...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000754

    Original file (20110000754.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) Record of Proceedings (ROP) awarding the Purple Heart to Private First Class (PFC) E____ R. H____ * a newspaper article showing award of the Purple Heart to PFC E____ R. H____ * a statement from PFC E____ R. H____ * two previously-submitted witness statements CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Therefore, he is entitled to award of the Purple Heart and correction of his records to show his wound and this medal. As a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011468

    Original file (20090011468.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 33 does not show award of the Purple Heart; and b. The fact that the proposed recipient was participating in direct or indirect combat operations is a necessary prerequisite, but is not sole justification for award: a. examples of enemy-related injuries which clearly justify award of the Purple Heart are injury caused by enemy bullet, shrapnel, or other projectiles created by enemy action, injury caused by enemy placed mine or trap, injury caused by enemy released chemical, biological,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050006721C070206

    Original file (20050006721C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, he was wounded in action on 12 April 1966, while serving in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN). The applicant’s Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) contains no orders or other documents that indicate he was ever wounded in action, or awarded the PH. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned to show his entitlement to the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080002621

    Original file (20080002621.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 15 May 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080002621 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Therefore, it would be in the interest of justice to correct his records to show that he received shrapnel wounds to the legs, arms, wrist, and eye in Belgium on 20 December 1944 and by awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds received in action against the enemy in Belgium on 20 December 1944. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...