Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009400
Original file (20130009400.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		

		BOARD DATE:	  16 January 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130009400 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that her reentry eligibility (RE) code be changed in order to reenter the military.

2.  The applicant states she feels she did nothing wrong to deserve the RE code she was given.

3.  The applicant provides no additional evidence.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 23 January 2013.  

2.  Her military records show that while attending basic combat training (BCT), she was counseled on numerous occasions for multiple Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT) failures, lack of motivation, failure to meet required standards, failure to follow instructions, and lack of discipline.  

3.  On 28 March 2013, her immediate commander initiated separation action against her under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 11 (Entry Level Performance and Conduct).  The immediate commander cited as the specific reason for the proposed separation the applicant's failure to adapt to the military environment due to her inability to pass the APFT and minor disciplinary infractions which prevented the completion of BCT.

4.  The applicant was advised by legal counsel of the basis for the contemplated action to separate her for entry level performance and conduct under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 11 and its effects, of the rights available to her, and of the effect of any action taken by her in waiving her rights.

5.  On 31 March 2013, the appropriate authority approved the separation.  On 
11 April 2013, she was discharged accordingly.  Her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows in:

* block 26 (Separation Code) the entry "JGA"
* block 27 (Reentry Code) the entry "3"
* block 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) the entry "Entry Level Performance and Conduct"

6.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 11 of this regulation provides for the separation of personnel due to unsatisfactory performance or conduct, or both, while in an entry level status.  This provision of regulation applied to individuals who had demonstrated that they were not qualified for retention because they could not adapt socially or emotionally to military life, or because they lacked the aptitude, ability, motivation, or self discipline for military service, or they had demonstrated characteristics not compatible with satisfactory continued service.  The separation policy applied to Soldiers who could not meet the minimum standards prescribed for successful completion of training because of lack of aptitude, ability, motivation, or self-discipline.  

7.  Army Regulation 601-210 (Active and Reserve Components Enlistment Program) covers eligibility criteria for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army and the U.S. Army Reserve.  This regulation provides that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge.  Chapter 3 of this regulation prescribes basic eligibility for prior-service applicants for enlistment.  This chapter includes a list of Armed Forces RE codes, including Regular Army RE codes.  

   a.  RE-3 applies to persons not qualified for continued Army service at the time of discharge, but the disqualification is waivable.

	b.  RE-1 applies to persons completing their term of service who are considered qualified to reenter the Army, so long as all other qualifications are met.

8.  Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) prescribes the specific authorities and the reasons for the separation of members from active military service and the SPD codes to be used.  The regulation shows that the SPD code of JGA as shown on the applicant's DD Form 214 is appropriate for involuntary discharge when the narrative reason for discharge is entry level performance and conduct and the authority for discharge is Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 11.

9.  The SPD Code/RE Code Cross Reference Table states that when the SPD code is JGA then an RE code of 3 will be assigned.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that her RE code should be changed so that she may reenter the military.

2.  Evidence shows she was properly separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 11 by reason of entry level performance and conduct.  Based on the authority and reason for separation, she was properly assigned an SPD code of JGA and a corresponding RE code of 3 in accordance with the applicable regulations.  Therefore, without evidence showing that an error exists on her DD Form 214 or that her discharge was in error or unjust, there is no basis to grant the relief requested.

3.  The applicant is advised that although no change is being recommended regarding her RE code, this does not mean that she is permanently disqualified from reentering military service.  RE-3 applies to persons who are not considered fully qualified for reentry or continuous service; however, it does allow for a waiver of disqualification.  Therefore, if she desires to reenter military service, she should contact a local recruiter who can best advise her on her eligibility for returning to military service.  Those individuals can best advise a former service member as to the needs of the service at the time and may process RE code waivers.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X_  ___X_____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _________X_______________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130009400



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130009400



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011209

    Original file (20140011209.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This regulation provides that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) prescribes the specific authorities and the reasons for the separation of members from active military service and the SPD codes to be used. The regulation shows that the SPD code of "JGA," as shown on his DD Form 214, is appropriate for involuntary...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010136

    Original file (20130010136.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This regulation provides that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) prescribes the specific authorities and the reasons for the separation of members from active military service and the SPD codes to be used. The regulation shows that the SPD code of JGA as shown on the applicant's DD Form 214 is appropriate for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008117

    Original file (20140008117.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 3 December 2009, her immediate commander initiated separation action against her under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 11 (Entry Level Performance and Conduct). This regulation provides that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) prescribes the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019246

    Original file (20130019246.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) issued to the applicant on the date of his separation confirms he was separated under the provisions of chapter 11, Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of entry-level performance and conduct. Army Regulation 635-200 provides that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The evidence of record confirms that separation...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070016528

    Original file (AR20070016528.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 8 December 1999, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct for failure to adapt to military environment, repeated APFT failure, and for lack of motivation, with an uncharacterized discharge. The applicant waived her right to consult with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120021126

    Original file (AR20120021126.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct with an uncharacterized service separation. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Entry Level Performance and Conduct," and the separation code is "JGA." Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293, dated 9 October 2012; DD Form 214 for service under...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017574

    Original file (20110017574.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that her separation program designator (SPD) code of "JGA" and her reentry eligibility (RE) code of 3 be changed to more favorable codes so that she may reenter the military. It states that the SPD code "JGA" is the appropriate code to assign Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 11. The applicant did not provide any evidence to support her contention that her drill sergeant told her that she could be discharged if...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130003974

    Original file (AR20130003974.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests an upgrade of her discharge from uncharacterized to general under honorable conditions and a change to the narrative reason for separation to medical. It states a separation will be described as entry-level with service uncharacterized if, at the time separation action is initiated, the Soldier has less than 180 days of continuous active duty service. The separation authority approved the applicant's discharge as entry-level status, with the description of service as...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012262

    Original file (AR20060012262.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows that on 24 October 1994, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct (she was diagnosed as having an adjustment disorder with depressed mood), with an uncharacterized discharge. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records for the period of enlistment under review,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021731

    Original file (20140021731.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: a. His records contain and he provided copies of four DA Forms 4856 showing he was counseled on/for: * 18 November 2013 – failing to follow instructions; leaving his battle buddy behind; and disregarding the Army's Core Values of Duty, Honor, Selfless Service, and Respect; the drill sergeant recommended nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under Article 15, UCMJ * 5 December 2013 – negligent discharge of his weapon on 4 December 2013; the drill sergeant recommended NJP...