Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009152
Original file (20130009152.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		

		BOARD DATE:	  27 February 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130009152 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests reconsideration of his previous application for reinstatement into the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) and promotion to the rank of captain (CPT).

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that his first non-selection was due to a material error.  He goes on to state that the record of proceedings indicating he had completed his service obligation is questionable and should be recalculated to show that his obligation expires in May 2013.  He further states that there are provisions of law that provide for his retention.  He also states that he met the requirements and should have been promoted to the rank of CPT.

3.  The applicant provides a two-page letter explaining his request that also contains a list of enclosures with his request.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20110021577, on 14 June 2012.

2.  The available evidence shows the applicant completed his bachelor’s degree on 12 May 2005 and he was appointed as a USAR second lieutenant on the same date.

3.  The applicant completed the Transportation Officer Basic Course on
20 December 2005.  His DA Form 1059 (Academic Evaluation Report) was added to his interactive Personnel Electronic Records Management System (IPERMS) records on 10 January 2006.

4.  He was promoted to the rank of first lieutenant on 27 May 2007.

5.  His bachelor’s degree was not added to his iPERMS records until 22 October 2010.

6.  Meanwhile, the applicant was notified by memorandum that he was not selected for promotion to the rank of CPT by the mandatory selection board that convened on 3 November 2009 because his records did not indicate that he had completed the required civilian and/or military education by the day before the date the board convened.  There is no evidence in the available records to show that he requested promotion reconsideration.

7.  His records contain two DA Form 67-9 (Officer Evaluation Reports) covering the periods 1 December 2007 through 23 July 2008 (a referred report) and          1 December 2008 through 30 November 2009 which show that he was not recommended for promotion by either his rater or senior rater.  

8.  His records show that he was twice non-selected for promotion to CPT by the Fiscal Year 2010 Reserve Component Selection Board (RCSB) and on 2 March 2011 his security clearance was suspended.

9.  On 1 November 2011, he was discharged from the USAR due to being twice non-selected to CPT.

10.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 14504, states officers twice non-selected for promotion to CPT will be removed from the Reserve Active Status List on the first day of the seventh month after the President approves the board unless otherwise selectively continued (SELCON) or unless the officer is retained under another provision of law.  Retention is authorized for Soldiers selected for SELCON or those who have at least 18 but less than 20 qualifying years for retired pay at age 60 (Reserve Sanctuary).  SELCON for first lieutenants is only authorized for officers who have not completed their baccalaureate degree and only until the end of their statutory obligation.




11.  Army Regulation 135-175 prescribes the policies and procedures for the separation of RC officers.  Chapter 4, paragraph 4-4a(5), states officers in the rank of first lieutenant, CPT, or major, who have completed their statutory military service obligation, will be discharged for failure to be selected for promotion after the second consideration by an RCSB.  

12.  That regulation also provides that a first lieutenant on the Reserve Active Status List who has failed selection for promotion to CPT for the second time and whose name is not on a list of officers recommended for promotion to CPT, will be removed from an active status not later than the first day of the seventh month after the month in which the final approval authority approves the report of the board which considered the officer for the second time unless the officer can be credited with 18 or more but less than 20 years of qualifying service for retired pay.

13.  Additionally, officers who discover that a material error existed in their file at the time they were non-selected for promotion may request reconsideration.  Reconsideration will normally not be granted when the error is minor or when the officer, by exercising reasonable care, could have detected and corrected the error.  To determine if there is an error in the promotion file, the officer may request, within 2 years of the board recess date, a copy of his or her file, as considered by the mandatory Reserve of the Army selection board.  

14.  Material error is defined as one or more errors of such a nature that in the judgment of the reviewing official or body may have caused an individual’s non-selection by a promotion selection board.  Had such errors been corrected at the time the individual was considered, a reasonable chance would have resulted that the individual would have been recommended for promotion.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contentions and supporting documents have been noted and appear to lack merit.

2.  The absence of his completion of civilian and military education documents from his officials records do not constitute material error in the applicant’s case because he could have detected and corrected the errors by exercising reasonable care in the form of reviewing his records before being considered by a promotion selection board. 



3.  His contention regarding his military service obligation has been noted; however, in his case the issue is not relevant.  He did not have sufficient service to qualify for retention under Reserve Sanctuary (18 or more years) and he was properly discharged after being twice non-selected for promotion to CPT.

4.  Additionally, he received two evaluation reports that recommended that he not be promoted to CPT and he has failed to provide sufficient evidence to show that those reports are unjust and should be removed from his records.

5.  In view of the foregoing, there appears to be no basis to grant his request for reinstatement and promotion.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X__  ___X_____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis to amend the decision of the ABCMR set forth in Docket Number AR20110021577, dated 14 June 2012.




      _______ _ X  _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130009152



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130009152



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021577

    Original file (20110021577.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The reason given was that the records review did not indicate he had completed the required civilian and/or military education by the day before the date the board convened. e. The opinion further indicated the applicant may be eligible for a promotion reconsideration board because he provided evidence indicating he was educationally qualified at the time he was considered by the FY 2010 Captain APL promotion board. He was also not selected for promotion to captain by this board.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120013134

    Original file (20120013134.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * He is a Special Agent/GS-14 (now Senior Executive Service) with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and has been designated a Key Federal Employee since May 2010 * Despite being twice not selected for promotion to lieutenant colonel (LTC), he was provided positive written notifications, on two occasions, that he was SELCON (continued service on the Reserve Active Status List (RASL) in March 2011, approved by the Secretary of the Army (SA) * Regardless whether a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000081

    Original file (20130000081.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records as follows: * revoke Orders 12-228-00030, issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Reserve Command (USARC), Fort Bragg, NC, on 15 August 2012, honorably discharging him from the USAR * reinstate him to Reserve Active Status List * promote him to major (MAJ) per the Fiscal Year 2012 MAJ Army promotion list that was released on 8 November 2012 2. As a result of the delay of the MAJ Board Results stated in Military Personnel (MILPER) Message Number...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018772

    Original file (20140018772.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, reversal of the Fiscal Year (FY) 2014 Major (MAJ), Army Promotion List (APL), Promotion Selection Boards (PSB) decision that shows he was not recommend for Selective Continuation (SELCON) of service. c. In order to be granted an MILED waiver for promotion, an applicant must have completed at a minimum the non-resident portion of the course and be scheduled for the resident phase as established in Military Personnel Message (MILPER) 13-351, dated 5 December...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019686

    Original file (20130019686.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A memorandum from HRC, subject: Selective Continuation (SELCON) on the Reserve Active Status List (RASL), dated 30 January 2012, shows the applicant was notified that he was not selected by the Army Reserve Components Promotion Selection Board (PSB) for the second time. The advisory official stated that the USAR AGR Program does not reinstate officers; they must re-apply and meet the current needs of the AGR Program. The evidence of record shows the applicant was serving as a MAJ in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020845

    Original file (20090020845.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The regulation further specifies that the Chief, Office of Promotions, is the approval authority for all current year criteria requests for exception to non-statutory promotion requirements (i.e., civilian education), and that requests must contain complete justification and be received prior to the board convening date. The evidence of record shows the applicant was twice considered for promotion to CPT but he was not selected by reason of not being educationally qualified. As a result,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022351

    Original file (20120022351.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He states he was selected for promotion to LTC in June 2012 and he was released from active duty (REFRAD) on 1 August 2012. Although the applicant was selected for promotion prior to his REFRAD from the AGR Program, the board was not approved until after his REFRAD, resulting in the applicant being a promotable LTC on the RASL. Evidence of record shows that on 30 January 2012 the applicant was notified by memorandum that the Secretary of the Army approved the SELCON Board recommendation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130022355

    Original file (20130022355.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    f. He immediately enrolled in college and resumed classes on 5 July 2010. g. On 21 September 2010, * Mr. M_____, his HRC Branch Manager, informed him that per Military Personnel Message 10-179, he needed to prepare for promotion consideration by the CPT board that would convene and consider him in November 2010 * he (the applicant) immediately replied on the same day informing his branch manager he was deployed and had not yet completed his bachelor's degree at that time * Mr. M_____...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016646

    Original file (20130016646.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Memorandum, dated 2 August 2013, the CG of the 79th USAR Sustainment Support Command recommended approval of the applicant's request for reconsideration for promotion to CPT based on her civilian education requirement being met. The TIG requirements to CPT for the promotion boards conducted for the period 2011-2016 were accelerated based on the memoranda from the Army Reserve G-1, dated 25 March 2010 and 25 June 2010, which are in contrast with the TIG requirements published in Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070016101

    Original file (20070016101.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It states that each reserve officer of the Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marine Corps who is in an active status or on an inactive-status list and who reaches the maximum age specified in section 14509, 14510, 14511, or 14512 of this title for the officer’s grade or position shall (unless the officer is sooner separated or the officer’s separation is deferred or the officer is continued in an active status under another provision of law) not later than the last day of the month in which the...