Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008893
Original file (20130008893.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  9 January 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130008893 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show his:

* name as D. L. W _ _ _ _
* Sex as male
* Rank as private first class, pay grade E-3

2.  The applicant states his birth certificate is proof of his name and sex.  He contends that he held pay grade E-3 at the time of his discharge.

3.  The applicant provides copies of:

* DD Form 214
* Letter from the Texas Department of State Health Services, dated             2 February 2012
* State of Texas Certification of Vital Record, issued on 2 February 2012

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  A review of the applicant's military records reveals that:

	a.  the applicant had enlisted in the Regular Army on 6 April 1976;

	b.  a DD Form 1966 (Application for Enlistment) page 1 shows the applicant's name as D _ _ _ _ L _ _ _ _ R _ _ _ _; sex as female;

	c.  a DD Form 1966, page 6 shows the applicant signed the form using the same full name as indicated on page 1 of the form;

	d.  a DD Form 369 (Police Record Check) and finger print card shows the applicant as a female with the same name and signature as on the DD Form 1966 discussed above;

	e.  a DA Form 2 (Personnel Qualification Record - Part I) indicates the applicant was a married female Soldier with three dependents;

	f.  without exception, every document in the applicant's military records requiring a name and/or signature shows the same spelling for the first, middle, and last names and corresponding signature when appropriate.  Furthermore, there is no document in the record indicating the applicant to be anything other than female.

	g.  a DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record - Part II) shows that the applicant enlisted in the rank of private, pay grade E-1; was advanced to private, pay grade E-2 on 6 August 1976; and was reduced to private, pay grade E-1 on 28 January 1977, just 5 days after returning from being absent without leave (AWOL).

3.  The applicant's DD Form 214 shows:

* Name: R _ _ _ _ , D _ _ _ _ L _ _ _ _
* Sex: F
* Grade. Rate or Rank: Private
* Pay Grade: E-1
* Date of Rank: 28 January 1977

4.  The Texas State vital record provided by the applicant shows the applicant's name as D. L. W _ _ _ _ ; sex as male, and that the document is a true and correct abstract of the original record and was issued on 2 February 2012.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show his:

* name as D. L. W _ _ _ _
* Sex as male
* Rank as private first class, pay grade E-3

2.  The available records show that the applicant served in the Regular Army as a female using the name currently recorded in her military records.

3.  Furthermore, the records indicate the applicant was reduced from private, pay grade E-2 to private, pay grade E-1 shortly prior to being discharged.  There is no evidence the applicant was ever advanced to the rank of private first class, pay grade E-3.

4.  The fact that the applicant now desires to change the military records for personal reasons is not a sufficiently mitigating factor that warrants granting relief.

5.  For historical purposes the Army has an interest in maintaining the accuracy of its records.  The information contained in those records must reflect the conditions and circumstances that existed at the time the records were created.

6.  The applicant is advised that a copy of this decisional document will be filed in his Army Military Human Resource Record.  This should serve to clarify any questions or confusion in regard to the difference in his current name and the one recorded in his military record and satisfy his desire to have his current name documented in his record.

7.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.



BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ___x____  ____x ___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      ___________x______________
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130008893





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130008893



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9702282

    Original file (9702282.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. REQUESTED ACTION: ' Member wants sex/gender marker of male on master ' personnel record and master personnel files changed to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000123C070206

    Original file (20050000123C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant is not interested in changing the name and gender throughout the military record, only on the subject DD Form 214. Therefore, as a matter of compassion, it would be appropriate to issue a Transcript of Military Record (DA Form 1569), under the applicant's current legal female name, showing the applicant's honorable active duty service from 29 April 1965 through 18 January 1968 and from 19 January 1968 through 13 May 1970. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000407

    Original file (20110000407.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was a female born on 10 December 1951 under the first and middle name of “Patricia Anne.” She enlisted in the Regular Army in Jacksonville, FL on 12 March 1974 for a period of 3 years, training as a parachute rigger, and assignment to Fort Bragg, NC. The applicant is advised that a copy of this decisional document along with his application and the supporting evidence he provided, which confirms his sex is now “male,” will be filed in his Official Military Personnel File...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013054

    Original file (20090013054.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    All documents and orders on file in the applicant's Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) that contain a name and/or gender, show the first name Edward and gender as male. However, while the applicant's desire to change the military record to show the name and gender she currently uses is understood, there is insufficient evidence to support granting the requested relief. The fact that subsequent to service the applicant changed her first name and gender does not provide a sufficiently...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070002071

    Original file (20070002071.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of the gender and name that is recorded in her military service records. The applicant’s military service records contain a copy of Headquarters, Department of the Army, U.S. Total Army Personnel Command, St. Louis, Missouri, Orders A-06-001186, dated 20 June 1989, that ordered the applicant to active duty. In this regard, the evidence of record shows that the applicant’s military service records reflect the correct name and sex under which...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005596

    Original file (20140005596.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provided a driver's license issued by the state of Texas on 8 July 2009, reflecting that his gender is male. The evidence indicates an administrative error occurred during the recording of the applicant's gender on his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214 to show his gender is male.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009798

    Original file (20140009798.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's records thereafter consistently show the same name and gender as reflected on the applicant's DD Form 1966. The applicant’s DD Form 214, with the period ending 28 February 1986, shows the same name and gender as indicated on the DD Form 1966. _______ _ X _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075336C070403

    Original file (2002075336C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Thus, the Board finds no basis to grant the applicant’s request to change the military record. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by issuing to the applicant a Transcript of Military Records (DA Form 1596), in her new name ordered in the enclosed court decree,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010667

    Original file (20110010667.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of the DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show to show a name of "J_____ W_____ P____" instead of "B_____ K______ D_____" and to show the gender as male instead of female. The applicant states the DD Form 214 should reflect the name change and sex change.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016603

    Original file (20090016603.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show his first and middle names as "M___ R___" instead of "H___ K___" and to show his gender as male instead of female. The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show his correct first and middle names and correct gender.