Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008553
Original file (20130008553.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  4 February 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130008553 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests receipt of pay and allowances withheld during pre-trial 
confinement for a 7-month period.

2.  The applicant states his pay was stopped from approximately October 1973 to May 1974.  He has only been able to obtain some medical records that show a couple of months of incarceration.  Hopefully, other records will show the rest of the time.

3.  The applicant provides two pages of medical records.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 30 August 1972.  He completed training, was awarded military occupational specialty 36K (Wireman), and was stationed in Germany.

3.  His record shows:

* receipt of nonjudicial punishment under the provisions of Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice on two occasions
* conviction by summary court-martial of communicating a threat, using provoking words, being absent without leave, and willfully disobeying a noncommissioned officer
* the approved sentence included reduction to pay grade E-1, forfeiture of $200 per month for 1 month, 30 days restriction, and 15 days extra duty

4.  On 26 August 1974, the applicant was separated with an honorable characterization of service.  He had served 1 year, 11 months, and 24 days of creditable service and had 3 days lost time.  He was released early because his short remaining active duty obligation precluded reassignment.

5.  There is no documentation in his record that shows he was confined pending trial for an extended period of time and none that any pay was withheld.

6.  The medical records submitted by the applicant in support of his request show:

* he was treated at a confinement facility dispensary on 15 and 22 January and 3 February 1974
* his organization was listed as, "Stockade" when he was seen at the emergency room of the 130th General Hospital on 16 February 1974
* these records do not show whether the applicant was a prisoner or a member of the confinement facility staff

7.  Army Regulation 15-185 sets forth the policy and guidance for the ABCMR.  Paragraph 2-9 states the Board begins its consideration of each case with the presumption of administrative regularity.  The applicant has the burden of proving an error or injustice by a preponderance of the evidence.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  There is no available evidence to substantiate the applicant's assertions that pay was withheld while he was in pretrial confinement for 7 months.

2.  The Board is required to presume regularity and the applicant has the responsibility to provide convincing evidence to the contrary.  Thus far, he has presented only some medical records that show he was assigned or attached to a confinement facility.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ___X__ _  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _  X ______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130008553





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130008553



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003099

    Original file (20140003099.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 31 March 1975, the applicant was advised in writing of being recommended for elimination from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-206 (Personnel Separations – Discharge – Misconduct) due to his conviction by civil authorities on the charge of robbery. Item 44 (Time Lost Under Section 972, Title 10, U.S. Code (USC) and Subsequent to Normal Date of Expiration of Term of Service) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows the following: * AWOL – 11 March...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002700

    Original file (20120002700.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests his undesirable discharge (UD) be upgraded to a general discharge and a personal appearance before the Board with counsel provided. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was recommended for discharge by reason of civil conviction.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018091

    Original file (20140018091.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests his under other than honorable conditions discharge be upgraded to a general discharge. In his request for discharge, he acknowledged he understood if the discharge request were approved, he might be discharged under other than honorable conditions and be furnished an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. A review of his record shows he repeatedly went AWOL and he had almost 8 months of lost time due to being AWOL or in confinement at the time of his discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010711

    Original file (20090010711.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) in pay grade E-1 on 16 November 1972 for 3 years. There is no evidence that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations. There is no evidence in the applicant's records and the applicant has provided no evidence to show that his discharge was unjust.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017491

    Original file (20080017491.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's request for discharge in lieu of court-martial is not on file in his service personnel record; however, on 1 October 1974, he was reassigned to the U.S. Army Transfer Point, by Headquarters, 25th Infantry Division, Special Orders Number 205, for the purpose of early separation for the good of the service with an undesirable discharge. The evidence of record shows the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for conduct triable by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022709

    Original file (20100022709.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A Standard Form 88 (Report of Medical Examination) and a Standard Form 93 (Report of Medical History) show he received a medical examination on 23 October 1973. The evidence of record does not support the applicant's request for correction of his record to show he was discharged for medical reasons. The applicant was charged with the commission of an offense punishable under the UCMJ with a punitive discharge and requested discharge for the good of the service under the provisions of Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091713C070212

    Original file (2003091713C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that he was not physically fit to perform guard duty because he was under a limited duty profile. DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action), dated 11 November 1974, shows the applicant's duty status was changed from "Present for Duty" to "Civilian Confinement" effective 7 November 1974. There is no evidence in the available records which shows the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board within its 15-year statute of limitations.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080004103

    Original file (20080004103.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In his statement, he stated, in effect, he had been in the Army for approximately a year and he had absented himself from duty four times and in the same time he had received four Article 15s. The applicant's record shows he received non-judicial punishment under the UCMJ twice and was tried and convicted by a special court-martial once. In a statement the applicant submitted at the time he requested discharge, he stated, in effect, he never actually wanted to join the Army in the first place.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001749

    Original file (20150001749.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he was discharged in the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 vice private (PV2)/E-2. It states items 6a and 6b will show the active duty rank and pay grade at the time of the Soldier's separation. There is no evidence in his records and he provides none that shows he was promoted beyond the rank/grade of PV2/E2 from the date he was reduced to the lowest enlisted grade to the date...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007956

    Original file (20140007956.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, given that he was convicted and sentenced by a civil court and not court-martialed, there was no requirement for an investigation. On 4 December 1973, the Personnel Control Facility commander at Fort Benning, GA advised the applicant that he was being recommended for separation from the U.S. Army by reason of conviction by civil court under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-206. ____________X___________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record...