Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008513
Original file (20130008513.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	 

		BOARD DATE:	  31 December 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130008513 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his record to show the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) unit to which he was assigned was placed on "super active alert" between August 1968 and January 1971, declared combat ready, and ordered to deploy to Vietnam. 

2.  The applicant states:  

* the correction to his records will make all members of his unit eligible for Department of Veterans Affairs benefits
* he remembers that Company C along with 1st Battalion, 157th Infantry Brigade was called to a special maneuver in full battle gear by a five-star general
* his unit was placed on "super active alert" though an act of Congress, in accordance with Title 10, U.S. Code (Armed Forces)
* for the next year the unit remained packed and ready to deploy; however, his unit never deployed

3.  The applicant provides a self-authored statement.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  On 9 February 1966, the applicant enlisted in the USAR and was ordered to active duty for training on 31 January 1967.

3.  On 6 June 1967, he was released from active duty for training and released to the USAR. 

4.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows:

	a.  item 31 (Foreign Service) - is blank; 

   b.  item 38 (Record of Assignments) - he served in Philadelphia, PA, while assigned to Company C, 1st Battalion, 157th Infantry Regiment, during the period 9 February 1966 to 29 January 1971; and

	c.  item 38 - permanent orders discharged the applicant from the USAR on 
29 January 1971.

5.  The applicant's record is void of any evidence that shows Company C, 1st Battalion, 157th Infantry Regiment, was ordered to active duty and mobilized during the period August 1968 to January 1971.

6.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Personnel Separations - Separation Documents), in effect at the time, prescribed the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It established standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  There were no provisions for showing a unit’s deployment/alert status on the DD Form 214.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

There is no evidence nor did the applicant submit any evidence that shows he was ordered to active duty for the purpose of deploying to Vietnam during the period July 1968 to January 1971.  Therefore, he is not entitled to have his record corrected to show he was on active duty during the period July 1968 to January 1971. 
BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ___X___  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      ___________X____________
       	     CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130008513





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130008513



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004180

    Original file (20130004180.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was promoted to the rank/grade of major (MAJ)/O-4 when he was selected by the Position Vacancy Board (PVB) in March 2009. The applicant provides: a. his Officer Record Brief (ORB) which shows he was assigned as the 157th Infantry Brigade Chaplain for the period 16 September 2008 through 26 June 2011; b. a DA Form 4935, dated 8 January 2009, which shows the commander of the 157th Infantry Brigade identified the brigade chaplain...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017006

    Original file (20110017006.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his active duty training in 1975 and 1976. The applicant provides copies of his: * DD Form 4 (Enlistment Contract - Armed Forces of the United States), dated 2 February 1971 * DD Form 214 for the period ending 10 August 1971 * DA Form 20 * Letter Orders Number 05-295, Headquarters, First U.S. Army, Fort Meade, MD, dated 21 May 1974 * Orders 20-202, issued by the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020676

    Original file (20100020676.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the following awards: * Bronze Star Medal * Army Commendation Medal * Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) * Presidential Unit Citation * Valorous Unit Award * Meritorious Unit Commendation * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation 2. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070016788

    Original file (20070016788.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 also shows that, at the time of the applicant's assignment to the 2d Battalion, 320th Artillery, it was cited for award of the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation for the period 18 March 1968 through 2 May 1970 by DAGO Number 48, dated 1971. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 also shows that, at the time of the applicant's assignment to the 1st Battalion, 321st Artillery, it was cited for award of the Republic of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013166

    Original file (20090013166.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Among them, the 157th Infantry Brigade had no legal standing to conduct the FLIPL; the FLIPL IO failed to show that each Soldier’s actions were the "proximate cause" for the vehicle accident; the IO applied a "simple negligence" standard; the IO applied the incorrect standard of a "group liability" which does not exist under Army Regulation 735-5; the FLIPL should have identified each Soldier’s individual liability, as mitigated by the actions of any other person; the IO investigated the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001038

    Original file (20150001038.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 25 April 1968. The evidence of record confirms the applicant served in Vietnam from 24 September 1970 through 17 April 1971, a period of 6 months and 24 days. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for his period of service from 25 April 1968 through 17 April 1971 * adding to this DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013162

    Original file (20090013162.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Among them, the 157th Infantry Brigade had no legal standing to conduct the FLIPL; the FLIPL IO failed to show that each Soldier’s actions were the "proximate cause" for the vehicle accident; the IO applied a "simple negligence" standard; the IO applied the incorrect standard of a "group liability" which does not exist under Army Regulation 735-5; the FLIPL should have identified each Soldier’s individual liability, as mitigated by the actions of any other person; the IO investigated the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021112

    Original file (20130021112.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record), which was later created after his discharge from active duty and subsequent appointment in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR), shows he served in: * Vietnam, 1 October 1967 to 1 October 1968 * Germany, 17 September 1969 to 26 January 1971 * Vietnam, 28 February 1971 to 27 February 1972 6. 2nd Battalion, 35th Artillery (1 June 1968 to on or about 12 September 1968) was also cited for award of Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000644

    Original file (20080000644.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: Self-Authored Letter, dated 12 December 2007; DD Form 214; Department of the Army (DA) PUC General Orders (GO) Number (#) 25, dated 8 June 2001 and GO # 75, dated 2 December 1969; Officer Qualification Record (DA Form 66); and Headquarters, 4th Infantry Division Special Orders (SO) # 32, dated 1 February 1968. However, the evidence of record confirms his entitlement to one award of the PUC based on his service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027114

    Original file (20100027114.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file. The article said this was his second tour of duty in Vietnam. The evidence of record shows he was on TCS orders to deploy with his unit on 14 February 1968.