Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008222
Original file (20130008222.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  7 January 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130008222 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Army Commendation Medal with 2nd Oak Leaf Cluster (OLC).

2.  The applicant states he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal with 2nd OLC on or about October 1969.  

3.  The applicant provides copies of his amended Army Commendation Medal with "V" Device and Second OLC orders and DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 24 April 1968.  He completed training and was awarded military occupational specialty 11B (light weapons infantryman).  He served in Vietnam from 22 September 1968 through 16 September 1969, during four campaigns.  He was assigned to Company D, 2nd Battalion, 27th Infantry, 25th Infantry Division.   

3.  The following General Orders (GO) were issued by Headquarters, 25th Infantry Division:

* GO Number 4079, on 27 March 1969, awarding him the Army Commendation Medal with "V" Device and 1st OLC for heroism in connection with military operations against a hostile force in Vietnam on 25 February 1969
* GO Number 12461, on 3 October 1969, amending orders number 4079 to show award of the Army Commendation Medal with "V" Device and 2nd OLC

4.  On 6 January 1970, he accepted nonjudicial punishment under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice, for absenting himself from his unit from on or about 31 December 1969 to on or about 6 January 1970.  

5.  He was honorably released from active duty in pay grade E-5 on 30 March 1970 and was transferred the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Annual Training).  He was credited with completing 1 year, 11 months, and 2 days of net active service and 5 days of time lost.  His DD Form 214 lists the:

* National Defense Service Medal
* Vietnam Service Medal
* Vietnam Campaign Medal
* Combat Infantryman Badge
* Army Commendation Medal with "V" Device and 1st OLC
* Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device and 1st OLC
* two overseas service bars
* Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bars (M-16) and (M-14)

6.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in:

   a.  Item 38 (Record of Assignments) he received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his period of service; there is no evidence of any commander's disqualification that would have precluded the applicant from being recommended for or awarded the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.
   b.  Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) the same awards shown on his DD Form 214.

7.  Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Decorations and Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940 and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year.  The enlisted person must have had all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings.  

8.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the awards received by units serving in Vietnam.  It shows during his period of service with the 2nd Battalion, 27th Infantry, this unit was cited for the:

* Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, for the period 1 September 1968 through 30 September 1970, by Department of the Army GO (DAGO) Number 5, dated 1973
* Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation, for the period 1 January 1966 through 21 January 1970, by DAGO Number 51, dated 1971

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  GO awarded the applicant the Army Commendation Medal with "V" Device and 2nd OLC during his period of service in Vietnam.  Therefore, he is entitled to correction to his DD Form 214 to show this award.

2.  The evidence of record shows the applicant received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his service with no evidence of a commander's disqualification for the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.  There is evidence of minor indiscipline; however, this minor indiscipline should not overshadow the successful completion of his term of service.  He attained the rank of pay grade E-5, served in Vietnam and was awarded the Army Commendation Medal with "V" Device and Bronze Star Medal with “V” Device, and he completed his term of service.  Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to award him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 24 April 1968 through 30 March 1970 and to correct his DD Form 214 to show this award.

3.  The applicant participated in four campaigns during his service in Vietnam that entitles him to four bronze service stars for wear on his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal.  Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show the award of these service stars.

4.  GO awarded his unit in Vietnam the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation during his period of service.  Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show these unit awards.

BOARD VOTE:

____X____  ___X_____  ____X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

* deleting from his DD Form 214 the Army Commendation Medal with "V" Device and 1st Oak Leaf Cluster and the Vietnam Service Medal
* awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period
24 April 1968 through 30 March 1970
* adding to his DD Form 214 the:

* Army Commendation Medal (2nd Oak Leaf Cluster) and with "V" Device
* Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award)










* Vietnam Service Medal with four bronze service stars
* Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation
* Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation




      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130008222





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130008222



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023600

    Original file (20110023600.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 * DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) * Extract of Department of the Army (DA) Pamphlet 672-3 ((Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) * General Orders (GO) 1888 showing award of the Bronze Star Medal (1st OLC) with "V" Device * GO Number 3771 showing award of the Army Commendation Medal (1st OLC) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show these unit awards. As a result, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017645

    Original file (20090017645.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer Discharge) be corrected to show award of the Good Conduct Medal, the bronze service stars he is authorized for the Vietnam Service Medal, the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge for the (M-16 Rifle) and all unit awards he is authorized. During the applicant’s tour in Vietnam he served during three campaign periods. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022693

    Original file (20100022693.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, reconsideration of his request for award of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) with 3rd Oak Leaf Cluster (OLC) (4th Award) and its addition to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) dated 18 July 1973. General orders dated 6 August 1970 awarded the applicant the ARCOM with "V" Device. __________X______________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003334

    Original file (20140003334.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to reveal any evidence that he was WIA on a third occasion, or any orders or other evidence that shows he was awarded the PH (2nd OLC). c. The VSM is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008357

    Original file (20120008357.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The following general orders (GO) published by Headquarters, 9th Infantry Division awarded the applicant the following awards as indicated: * GO Number 7566, dated 26 August 1968, awarded him the BSM with "V" Device for heroism in Vietnam on 24 June 1968 * GO Number 8191, dated 9 September 1968, awarded him BSM with "V" Device for heroism in Vietnam on 12 and 13 August 1968 * GO Number 2550, dated 5 March 1969, awarded him the BSM (2nd OLC) for meritorious service in Vietnam for the period...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001230

    Original file (20110001230.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Furthermore, the evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Air Medal (9th OLC) with "V" Device for heroism which is not shown on his DD Form 214; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award. The evidence of record shows the applicant served in Korea from 19 August 1962 to 20 July 1963. By regulation, he served a qualifying period for award of the Korea Defense Service Medal; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show one...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005931

    Original file (20130005931.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The DD Form 214 he was issued shows he was awarded or authorized the: * Bronze Star Medal * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Service Medal * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) 4. Therefore, he should be awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 30 August 1966 through 29 August 1968 and his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002765

    Original file (20120002765.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The DD Form 214 he was issued lists the following awards: * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) * RVN Campaign Medal (RVNCM) * ARCOM with “V” Device * Combat Medical Badge * BSM 8. Therefore, it would be appropriate and serve the interest of justice and equity to award him the first award of the AGCM for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 4 April 1968 through 4 January 1970, and to add this award to his record and DD Form 214. As a result,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120012608

    Original file (20120012608.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests corrections to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 26 December 1970 to show in: * Item 20 (Place of Entry Into Current Active Service (City and State) the entry Fort Rucker, AL instead of Fort Tucker, AL * Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) the addition of the: * Vietnam Service Medal with one silver service star * Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010914

    Original file (20110010914.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the following awards: * Air Medal (AM) * Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) with 1st Oak Leaf Cluster (OLC) [2nd Award] * Bronze Star Medal (BSM) with "V" Device 2. The applicant's military records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 2 February 1968. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...