Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007853
Original file (20130007853.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  18 February 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130007853 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his date of rank (DOR) for appointment to the rank of chief warrant officer two (CW2) from 13 March 2013 to 16 May 2011.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, he was serving in pay grade E-7 with over 2 years of time in grade and should have been promoted early to the rank of CW2 upon completion of the Warrant Officer Basic Course on 16 May 2011.  However, he was not promoted to the rank of CW2 until 13 March 2013, which was indicative of a normal promotion process.

3.  The applicant provides the enclosures listed in his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant was serving in the Oklahoma Army National Guard (OKARNG) when he was promoted to pay grade E-7 on 20 May 2008.

2.  On 10 October 2010, he was ordered to active duty for training (ADT) at Fort Rucker, Alabama, for a period of 1 year.

3.  On 18 November 2010, he was appointed as a Reserve warrant officer one in the OKARNG.

4.  On 16 May 2011, he completed the Aviation Warrant Officer Basic Course.  He was released from ADT to the control of his OKARNG unit on 17 May 2011.

5.  On 13 March 2013, he was promoted to the rank of CW2 and granted Federal recognition.

6.  In the processing of this case, a staff advisory opinion was obtained from the National Guard Bureau (NGB) which recommends denial of his request.  NGB states that while the applicant met the requirements for promotion to the rank of CW2, the OKARNG did not submit his promotion packet to NGB in a timely manner.  The applicant was placed on a scroll that was signed by the Secretary of Defense on 14 March 2013.  The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for comment.  He requested a 30-day extension to respond and no response has been received by the staff of the Board to date.  The applicant is currently deployed to Afghanistan.

7.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 12211 (Officers:  ARNG of the United States), states when an officer of the ARNG to whom temporary Federal recognition has been extended is appointed as a Reserve for service as a member of the ARNG of the United States, his appointment shall bear the date of the temporary recognition and shall be considered to have been accepted and effective on that date.

8.  National Guard Regulation 600-101 (Warrant Officers – Federal Recognition and Related Personnel Actions) prescribes policies and procedures for ARNG warrant officer personnel management.  Chapter 7 states that promotion of warrant officers in the ARNG is a function of the State.  As in original appointments, a warrant officer promoted by State authority has a State status in the higher grade under which to function.  However, to be extended Federal recognition in the higher grade, the officer must satisfy the requirements for this promotion.  Promotions will be based on the Department of the Army proponent duty military occupational specialty certification via satisfactory completion or constructive credit of appropriate level of military education, time in grade, demonstrated technical and tactical competence, and potential for service in the next higher grade as determined by a Federal Recognition Board.

9.  NGB Policy Memorandum 11-015, dated 14 June 2011, subject:  Federal Recognition of Warrant Officers in the ARNG, states that ARNG warrant officers are initially appointed and are also promoted by the State or Territory to which the officer is assigned.  The Chief, NGB, reviews and approves those actions.  Title 10, U.S. Code, sections 571b and 12241b, introduce a requirement that all warrant officer appointments and promotions to chief warrant officer grades in the ARNG be made by the President of the United States.  As a result, effective 7 January 2011, all initial appointments of warrant officers and promotion to higher grades, by warrant or commission, will be issued by the President (delegated to the Secretary of Defense).  Requests for appointment will be staffed through the Department of the Army, Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1.  This requirement may add 90 days or more to the process for approval for appointments or promotions to be completed.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows the applicant met the requirements for appointment/promotion as a CW2 on 18 May 2011.  He was considered by a Federal Recognition Board that found him fully satisfactory in his physical qualifications, moral character, and general qualifications.  NGB issued Federal recognition orders for promotion to CW2 effective 13 March 2013 despite his having met promotion qualification on 18 May 2011.

2.  However, as a result of the 2011 National Defense Authorization Act, the promotion of warrant officers is now issued by the President of the United States and is delegated to the Secretary of Defense.  Once the Secretary approves the scroll, the Board can approve a change to the DOR, but not the effective date of promotion.

3.  Accordingly, his DOR should be changed to reflect 18 May 2011.  However, this DOR change by the Board will not entitle the applicant to any additional pay and allowances.

BOARD VOTE:

____X___  ____X___  ___X__ _  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all 


Department of the Army and Army National Guard records of the individual concerned be corrected by changing the applicant's DOR to CW2 to 18 May 2011.




      _______ _  X ______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130007853



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130007853



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017800

    Original file (20130017800.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that when his initial appointment packet was accepted and processed by NGB, he was placed on a scroll for newly-appointed lieutenants. Order Number 197 AR, dated 25 May 2012, shows the applicant's promotion effective date as 16 May 2012. d. Even with the delay, his promotion packet could not have been submitted for processing until he completed WOBC. Nevertheless, once he completed WOBC, on 16 December 2011, his promotion packet was processed by the NGB and his Federal...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002153

    Original file (20140002153.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Promotion will not be used solely as a reward for past performance " Warrant officers must go through the Federal recognition process, and the promotion effective date is when the scroll is signed. This memorandum states all initial appointments of warrant officers and appointments in a higher grade (promotion) by warrant or commission will be issued by the President effective 7 January 2011. c. Before NDAA 2011, all ARNG warrant officer promotions effective DOR were the date of the State...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007860

    Original file (20130007860.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His effective date for promotion to E-7 was 9 August 2006; his effective date of appointment to warrant officer candidate was 28 July 2010; his effective date of appointment to warrant officer one (WO1) was 10 November 2010; his completion of WOBC and State promotion to CW2 was 18 April 2012; and his Federal recognition effective date of rank was 28 December 2012. c. All prerequisites to meet the promotion eligibility guidelines for CW2 were achieved. The applicant provides: * NGB Policy...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005753

    Original file (20130005753.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests his effective date of promotion and date of rank (DOR) to chief warrant officer two (CW2) in the Army National Guard (ARNG) be adjusted from 19 February 2013 to 12 January 2013. b. NGB, Federal Recognition section provided the processing history of the applicant's request as follows: * 21 November 2012, the Federal Recognition section reviewed the applicant's promotion packet * 26 November 2012, the applicant's promotion packet was accepted by Human Resource...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012973

    Original file (20130012973.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This memorandum states all initial appointments of warrant officers and appointments in a higher grade (promotion) by warrant or commission will be issued by the President effective 7 January 2011. c. Before NDAA 2011, all National Guard warrant officer promotions effective DOR was the date of the State promotion orders as stated in the Federal Recognition Board recommendations. Based on NGB Policy Memorandum Number 07-026, he would have been eligible for promotion to CW2 upon completion...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150012608

    Original file (20150012608.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Personnel Policy Operational Message Number 11-015, dated 14 June 2011, paragraph 2(b), states, in part, "[this policy memorandum] introduces a requirement that all warrant officer appointments and promotions to chief warrant officer grades in the ARNG of the United States be made by the [President of the United States] (POTUS)]" Paragraph 5(a) of the same memorandum, states in part, " effective 7 January 2011, all initial appointments of warrant officers and appointments in a higher grade...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019347

    Original file (20130019347.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his date of rank (DOR) to chief warrant officer two (CW2) in the New York Army National Guard (NYARNG) from 29 January 2013 to 20 August 2012. He further contends his DOR should be adjusted in accordance with (lAW) the NGB PPOM Number 13-006, dated 6 February 2013, which states in part, "Implement the 2013 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for WO promotions to CW2 which removed the requirement for a Federal Recognition Board (FRB) for promotion...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001592

    Original file (20150001592.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    BOARD DATE: 29 September 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20150001592 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, adjustment of his date of rank (DOR) for promotion to chief warrant officer two (CW2), from 29 January 2013 to 21 October 2012. As a result, effective 7 January 2011, all initial appointments of WOs and promotion to higher grades, by warrant or commission, will be issued by the President (delegated to the Secretary of Defense).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120012980

    Original file (20120012980.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 18 April 2011, the request for an ETP was approved by NGB allowing for the applicant's promotion packet to go before the State Federal Recognition Board. National Defense Authorization Action (NDAA) for Fiscal year 2001, dated 22 July 2011, subject: Changes to WO Federal Recognition Process, states all initial appointments of WO's and promotion to higher grades, by warrant or commission, will be issued by the President (delegated to the Secretary of Defense) effective 7 January 2011. As...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022185

    Original file (20120022185.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his effective date of promotion and date of rank (DOR) to chief warrant officer two (CW2) in the Army National Guard (ARNG) be adjusted to 15 September 2011 or earlier. National Defense Authorization Action (NDAA) for Fiscal year 2001, dated 22 July 2011, subject: Changes to WO Federal Recognition Process, states all initial appointments of WO's and promotion to higher grades, by warrant or commission, will be issued by the President (delegated to the...