Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006484
Original file (20130006484.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  26 November 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130006484 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, an exception to policy to transfer his education benefits to his dependents under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill.

2.  The applicant states:

* he did not receive any training, retirement counseling, or an explanation of the Post 9/11 GI Bill prior to leaving active duty on 30 September 2009
* by October 2009, he had performed all the drills and annual training days that he was allowed to perform for the rest of his 30-year career
* he attempted to transfer benefits to his son, but he was unable to do so and was told he had to have it done prior to retiring
* he was not aware of the requirements and his children have always been in his Defense Enrollment Eligibility Reporting System account
* he has no intentions of ever using the benefit for himself since he and his wife both have degrees
* he never returned to an Army Reserve unit and the unit he left only had one military person on the entire base and did not support retiring personnel
* while he was mobilized he lost everything he owned and had to file bankruptcy when his business partner double-crossed him
* he cashed in the college savings tuition program he had for his children while trying to fight his partner
* he has no other way to send his children to college
* he served his country faithfully and he and his family have suffered many hardships in doing so
* he is currently serving as a Department of Defense (DOD) civilian in Afghanistan
* he has no Officer Evaluation Report (OER) after 25 August 2008 which shows he did not receive any support

3.  The applicant provides self-authored statements.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's DD Form 93 (Record of Emergency Data), dated 3 December 2007, shows he has five dependents.

3.  Orders Number 09-064-00016, issued by Headquarters, 108th Training Command, Charlotte, NC, dated 5 March 2009, show that on 14 November 2008, the applicant was transferred outside of his command to a troop program unit (TPU) in Nashville, TN.

4.  A review of his records show only two documents (orders) after 2008 and his last OER was for the period 1 February 2008 through 25 August 2008.

5.  Orders Number 10-258-00047, issued by Headquarters, 81st Regional Support Command, Fort Jackson, SC, dated 15 September 2010, show that while assigned to a TPU in Nashville, TN, the applicant was reassigned to the Retired Reserve effective 31 May 2010.

6.  His U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Command (ARPC) Form 249-E (Chronological Statement of Retirement Points), dated 30 April 2013, shows he earned 48 inactive duty training points in retirement year ending (RYE) 16 May 2010.
7.  The applicant provides self-authored statements explaining his attempts to transfer his benefits.

8.  On 22 June 2009, the DOD established the criteria for eligibility and transfer of unused education benefits to eligible family members.  The policy states an eligible member is any member of the Armed Forces on or after 1 August 2009 who, at the time of the approval of the individual's request to transfer entitlement to educational assistance under this section, is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill and:

	a.  has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve 4 additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of election; or

	b.  has at least 10 years of service in the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve) on the date of election, is precluded by either standard policy (service or DOD) or statute from committing to 4 additional years, and agrees to serve the maximum amount of time allowed by such policy or statute; or

	c.  is or becomes retirement eligible during the period 1 August 2009 through 1 August 2013.  A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of Reserve service.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record does not support the applicant's request for correction of his record to allow him to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill education benefits.

2.  The Army, DOD, and VA initiated a massive public campaign that generated major communications through military, public, and social media venues on the Post 9/11 GI Bill and transfer of education benefits.  The probability is high that Soldiers who left service after the 90 days following the program's implementation were aware of the program.  He was transferred to the Retired Reserve 6 months outside of the 90-day window.

3.  Considering the lack of administrative support resulting from his geographical separation from his unit, it was in his best interest to seek information regarding his benefits elsewhere.  He does not indicate why he did not do so.  He earned 48 inactive duty points in RYE 16 May 2010 which shows he had contact with the Army and presumably would have been exposed to the publicity campaign noted above.  It is reasonable to presume that had he been proactive prior to his mandatory removal date, he could have easily have obtained the necessary information to effect a transfer of his Post 9/11 GI Bill education benefits prior to this separation date.

4.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ___X__ _  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _  X ______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130006484



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130006484



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001368

    Original file (20130001368.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant last served on active duty from 11 August 2007 to 13 July 2008 and the evidence shows he remained in a TPU unit until he was assigned to the Retired Reserve effective 28 June 2010. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing he filed his application and the Army approved his request to transfer Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his family members prior to his transfer to the Retired Reserve, provided...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011048

    Original file (20120011048.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He searched the Internet and found the official site for the Post-9/11 GI Bill which states that veterans who believe they were not informed of the requirement to transfer the educational benefits while still in service could request a correction of military records. Public Law 110-252, section 3319, provides the eligibility requirements necessary to transfer unused educational benefits to family members. The applicant's request to correct his record to show he was eligible to transfer his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001478

    Original file (20150001478.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he elected to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill educational benefits to his daughter. He had at least 6 years of eligible service in order to transfer educational benefits to his spouse and at least 10 years of eligible service to transfer educational benefits to eligible children. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct his military record to show he elected to transfer benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill transferability program...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010364

    Original file (20120010364.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, as a matter of equity his records should be corrected to show he did so in a timely manner prior to his effective date of transfer to the IRR. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the applicant filed his application and the Army approved his request to transfer Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his eligible family members prior to his transfer to the IRR, provided all other program eligibility...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018043

    Original file (20110018043.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    c. The advisory official notes the applicant is not eligible to transfer benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill transferability program to his stepdaughter. d. The advisory official states the Transfer of Education Benefit (TEB) online database shows the applicant had eligible dependents enrolled in DEERS. There is no evidence of record that shows the applicant was serving on active duty or as a member of the Selected Reserve of the U.S. Army on or after 1 August 2009.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020405

    Original file (20130020405.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with established Post-9/11 GI Bill Policy, if he did not have 20 qualifying years of service by 1 August 2009, then he must commit to serve the next 4 years on active duty in the Regular Army. The Post-9/11 GI Bill policy further states the Secretaries of the Military Department will provide active duty participants and members of the Reserve Components with qualifying active service individuals pre-separation or release from active duty counseling on the benefits under the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | AR20140007851

    Original file (AR20140007851.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show his education benefits were transferred to his eligible dependents in accordance with the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active service or 20 qualifying years of Reserve service. Evidence shows he served for a qualifying period, was eligible to complete, and could have completed the TEB action...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019121

    Original file (20090019121.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 3 March 2009 the applicant requested retirement into the Retired Reserve. He stated the advisory opinion offers no new information and reiterates his request to have his effective date of transfer amended to a date of 1 August 2009 or later. The applicant's request to have the date he was transferred to the Retired Reserve changed from 8 July 2009 to 6 August 2009 in order to transfer his education benefits to his family members was carefully considered; however, the applicant's...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009465

    Original file (20140009465.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states transferring him to the Retired Reserve on 20 April 2006 and declaring him medically disqualified to serve prevented him from serving the required time to transfer his educational benefits. He was given four options as follows: * request an honorable discharge * request an informal PEB to review his medical records for a final determination of medical fitness for retention * request reassignment to the Retired Reserve, if completed 20 qualifying years, with eligibility...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003970

    Original file (20150003970.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states – * he served in Iraq in 2003 * he has kept a watchful eye on his education benefits and was excited about the transferability of the benefits to his son * he retired from the Massachusetts Army National Guard (MAARNG) in 2009 after 23 years of service * to his knowledge the TEB had not been signed into law until 2010 * he was not informed at any of his exit briefings that he needed to designate a dependent to transfer his education benefits to before he retired * he now...