IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 12 December 2013
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130006304
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests an upgrade of his undesirable discharge to an honorable discharge.
2. The applicant states he has trouble remembering what he did wrong. He states he has attended training as a welder. He has been unable to find a job. He states the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) denied him benefits due to his under other than honorable conditions discharge.
3. The applicant provides no additional evidence.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. On 26 April 1974, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army. He did not complete basic training.
3. A DD Form 458 (Charge Sheet), dated 10 May 1974, shows court-martial charges were preferred against the applicant for:
* behaving with disrespect toward a superior noncommissioned officer (NCO)
* assaulting a superior NCO with a stick
* failure to obey a lawful order
4. The applicant acknowledged in an undated statement that he was in pre-trial confinement from 10 May 1974 until the date of making the statement. He also indicated he had previously received nonjudicial punishment for disobeying an order and was pending court-martial.
5. On 22 May 1974, the applicant voluntarily requested discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), chapter 10. He acknowledged he had not been subjected to coercion with respect to his request for discharge and he had been advised of the implications that were attached to his request.
a. He further acknowledged that by submitting his request for discharge, he was admitting that he was guilty of the charges against him or of lesser included offenses therein contained which also authorized the imposition of a bad conduct or dishonorable discharge. He indicated that under no circumstances did he desire further rehabilitation, for he had no desire to perform further military service.
b. He further acknowledged he understood that if his discharge request was accepted, he may be discharged under conditions other than honorable and furnished an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. He acknowledged he understood that as a result of the issuance of such a discharge, he would be deprived of many or all Army benefits, he could be ineligible for many or all benefits administered by the VA, and he could be deprived of his rights and benefits as a veteran under both Federal and State laws.
c. He elected not to submit a statement on his own behalf.
d. He acknowledged that prior to completing his request for discharge he had been afforded the opportunity to consult with counsel and was advised of the basis for his contemplated trial by court-martial under circumstances which could lead to a bad conduct or dishonorable discharge, of the effects of his request for discharge, and the rights available to him. He waived his rights in conjunction with this consultation.
6. On 23 May 1974, his commander recommended that, in view of the applicant's insubordination and belligerent acts toward a senior NCO, his request for discharge be accepted.
7. On 31 May 1974, the separation authority approved the applicants request for discharge and directed that he be given an Undesirable Discharge Certificate.
8. On 5 June 1974, he was discharged for the good of the service under the provisions of chapter 10, Army Regulation 635-200, with his service characterized as under conditions other than honorable. He was issued an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. His DD Form 214 shows he completed 1 month and 10 days of net active service.
9. There is no indication he applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations.
10. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.
a. Chapter 10 of the version in effect at the time provided that a member who committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment included a punitive discharge could submit a request for discharge for the good of the service at any time after court-martial charges were preferred. Commanders would ensure that an individual was not coerced into submitting a request for discharge for the good of the service. Consulting counsel would advise the member concerning the elements of the offense or offenses charged, type of discharge normally given under the provisions of this chapter, the loss of VA benefits, and the possibility of prejudice in civilian life because of the characterization of such a discharge. An Undesirable Discharge Certificate would normally be furnished to an individual who was discharged for the good of the service.
b. An honorable discharge was a separation with honor and entitled the recipient to benefits provided by law. The honorable characterization was appropriate when the quality of the members service generally met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel or was otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization was clearly inappropriate.
c. A general discharge was a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. When authorized, it was issued to a Soldier whose military record was satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant's contentions were carefully considered. However, the evidence of record does not support his request for an upgrade of his discharge.
2. He voluntarily requested discharge from the Army under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial. In doing so, he waived his opportunity to appear before a court-martial. At the time, an undesirable discharge was normally considered appropriate for Soldiers separated for the good of the service. All requirements of law and regulation were met and his rights were fully protected throughout the separation process.
3. The Board does not correct records solely for the purpose of establishing eligibility for other programs or benefits.
4. He admitted he was guilty of insubordination and belligerent acts toward a senior NCO. Based on the seriousness of his offenses, his service clearly did not meet the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel. Therefore, he is not entitled to an upgrade of his discharge.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___x____ ____x___ ____x___ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_______ _ x _______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20130006304
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20130006304
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010260
The applicant requests upgrade of his undesirable discharge. On 15 November 1974, following counseling, the applicant submitted a voluntary request for discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10, for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. ___________X____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029639
The applicant requests upgrade of his general discharge to an honorable discharge. On 16 July 1974, he voluntarily requested a discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10, for the good of the service - in lieu of trial by court-martial. The evidence of record shows the separation authority approved the applicant's voluntary request for discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10 on 10 September 1974.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017687
On 1 August 1975, the separation authority approved the applicant's request for discharge for the good of the service in accordance with chapter 10 of Army Regulation 635-200 and directed he receive an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. The DD Form 214 he was issued shows he was discharged for the good of the service in lieu of a court-martial with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7a, provides that an honorable...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084400C070212
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may at any time after the charges have been preferred, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. The character of the discharge is...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009777
He acknowledged he understood that he could request discharge for the good of the Service because court-martial charges had been preferred against him under the UCMJ which authorized the imposition of a bad-conduct or dishonorable discharge. Accordingly, he was discharged on 2 May 1979. His DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) shows he was discharged under the provisions of chapter 10, Army Regulation 635-200 for the good of the service and received an under other than...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021692
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. At the time the discharge was referred to as an undesirable discharge. While the applicant did serve in combat and received the Purple Heart, this service does not outweigh his 11 NJP's (including sleeping on guard duty in a combat zone), two special courts-martial, and 365 days of lost time, a pattern of misconduct that covered his entire period of service.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009124
The applicant requests an upgrade of his undesirable discharge to an honorable discharge. He consulted with legal counsel and voluntarily requested discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10. Chapter 10 of the version in effect at the time provided that a member who committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment included a punitive...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005306
The applicant requests his under other than honorable conditions discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. Since the incident the applicant had completely refused to do any duties he was assigned or ordered to do and the applicant stated he just wanted out of the military. On 21 October 1970, he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial with an under other than honorable conditions...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012652
In his request for discharge, he acknowledged he understood by requesting discharge he was admitting guilt to the charges against him or of a lesser included offense that also authorized the imposition of a bad conduct discharge. The DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) he was issued shows he was discharged for the good of the service - in lieu of a court-martial with an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. ___________X_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011889
The applicant requests upgrade of his undesirable discharge to an honorable discharge. The applicant indicated in his request for discharge that he understood if his discharge request was approved he could be discharged under other than honorable conditions and furnished an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. The applicant's military service records show that he voluntarily requested discharge for the good of the service - in lieu of trial by court-martial and he acknowledged guilt of the...