Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006114
Original file (20130006114.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		
		BOARD DATE:	  3 December 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130006114 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, as an exception to policy the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) under the provisions of the Post-9/11 GI Bill.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, during his retirement transitional brief he was not informed of the opportunity for transferability of the Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits. He contacted the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Educational Benefits Office to inquire why this change did not occur or if there was anything he could do.  The VA representative advised him that transferability should have been completed prior to his final out processing date and that there was nothing more he could do.  He decided to complete this DD Form 149 (Application for Correction of Military Record) to see if he can change this error.

3.  The applicant provides no additional evidence.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 11 January 1989.  He served continuously on active duty through several reenlistments until he was honorably retired on 31 July 2010.  He was credited with completing 21 years, 6 months, and 20 days of net active service with no time lost.

2.  On 22 June 2009, the DoD established the criteria for eligibility and transfer of unused educational benefits to eligible family members.  The policy states any member of the Armed Forces on or after 1 August 2009 who, at the time of the approval of the individual's request to transfer entitlement to educational assistance under this section, is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill and:

	a.  has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve 4 additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of election; or

	b.  has at least 10 years of service in the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve) on the date of election, is precluded by either standard policy (service or DoD) or statute from committing to four additional years and agrees to serve for the maximum amount of time allowed by such policy or statute; or

	c.  is or becomes retirement eligible during the period 1 August 2009 through 1 August 2013.  A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active service or 20 qualifying years of Reserve service.

3.  The policy further states the Secretaries of the Military Departments will provide active duty participants and members of the Reserve Components with qualifying active duty service individual pre-separation or release from active duty counseling on the benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill, document accordingly, and maintain records for individuals who receive supplemental educational assistance under Public Law 110-252, section 3316.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant was fully eligible to transfer his education benefits under the TEB prior to retirement, but he did not do so.  The program was implemented in July 2009 and he retired on 31 July 2010.  Prior to retirement, he did not apply for the transfer of benefits while on active duty.

2.  The DOD, VA, and the Army conducted massive public campaigns that generated major communications through military, public, and social media venues.  The information was published well in advance with emphasis on the criteria.  A Soldier must meet various criteria to qualify to transfer benefits to an eligible dependent; most importantly, the Soldier must be on active duty or in the Selected Reserve at the time of transfer.

3.  The applicant's service and his sincerity are not in question.  He continued to serve over 1 year after the TEB provision of the Post 9/11 GI Bill was implemented.  Therefore, he had plenty of time to submit his application and/or to verify that his application was submitted in the proper manner.  There is no evidence he exercised due diligence.  There is no evidence he was improperly/not briefed on this benefit.  While there may have been some confusion during the early stages after the implementation, he retired well after the program was implemented.

4.  There is neither an error nor an injustice in his transfer of benefits processing. Therefore, he is not entitled to the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X___  ___X_____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   X_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130006114





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130006114



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023142

    Original file (20110023142.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show he transferred his Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) benefits to his dependents under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provisions of the Post-9/11 MGIB. The policy states, in part, that those who retire on or before 1 August 2009 are, by law, not eligible to transfer unused Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits because their last day of duty will be 31 July 2009 and they will transfer to the Retired List on 1 August 2009. As a result,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012812

    Original file (20140012812.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    DOD policy further states the Secretaries of the Military Departments will provide active duty participants individual pre-separation or release from active duty counseling on the benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill, and document accordingly and maintain records for individuals who receive supplemental educational assistance under Public Law 110-252, section 3316. The applicant contends his records should be corrected to allow him to transfer his unused Post-9/11 GI Bill education benefits...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009634

    Original file (20120009634.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * he was never informed of Post-9/11 GI Bill or the requirement to be on active duty to transfer this benefit * he believes he should have been informed of his eligibility during his outprocessing briefing * he was not required to serve any additional service and had met the requirements; he retired on 30 November 2009 3. The advisory official recommended approval and stated the applicant gained eligibility for the Post-9/11 GI Bill benefit before he left the service;...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016063

    Original file (20100016063.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Public Law 110-252, dated 30 June 2008, authorized the Post-9/11 GI Bill effective 1 August 2009. The policy states, in part, that those who retire on or before 1 August 2009 are, by law, not eligible to transfer unused Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits because their last day of duty will be 31 July 2009 and they will transfer to the Retired List on 1 August 2009. Those who retire on or before 1 August 2009 are, by law, not eligible to transfer unused Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits because their last...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007965

    Original file (20120007965.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show he transferred his Montgomery GI Bill benefits to his dependent child Elise under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. Therefore, as a matter of equity, his records should be corrected to show he applied to transfer his educational benefits to his eligible family members in a timely manner prior to his effective date of retirement. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011813

    Original file (20100011813.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was on approved retirement transition leave from 19 June 2009 to 31 October 2009 when the final guidance was published which included the requirement to be on active duty to transfer benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill, chapter 33. The policy further states the Secretaries of the Military Departments will provide active duty participants and members of the Reserve Components with qualifying active duty service individual pre-separation or release from active duty counseling on the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009145

    Original file (20120009145.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show he transferred his Montgomery GI Bill benefits to his dependents under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provisions of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. He would have been eligible to transfer the education benefit if he had transferred them before he left active service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the applicant filed his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007459

    Original file (20120007459.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant had more than 20 years of service upon his retirement, so he was eligible to transfer his benefits to either his spouse or his children if he had completed the request before leaving service. A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of Reserve service. The available evidence shows the applicant was fully eligible to transfer his educational benefits under the TEB provision of the 9/11 GI...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006345

    Original file (20120006345.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The advisory official recommended approval of the applicant's request because the applicant left the military within 90 days of implementation of the program. A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of Reserve service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the applicant filed his application and the Army approved...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009431

    Original file (20120009431.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that the Army National Guard (ARNG) did not properly inform him during the time of his retirement that he could transfer his education benefits to his dependents prior to his retirement from the ARNG. The advisory official stated the applicant was eligible for Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits; however, he did not complete a request to transfer benefit on the Department of Defense's (DOD's) TEB online database before he left the service. Contrary to the basis for the approval...