Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005968
Original file (20130005968.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  26 November 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130005968 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of her date of rank (DOR) for promotion to first lieutenant (1LT) in the Vermont Army National Guard (VTARNG). 

2.  She believes a delay in the request for her promotion has caused her to have a later date of rank.  She completed the Basic Officer Leaders Course (BOLC) on 9 March 2012 and had 18 months as a second lieutenant (2LT) on 21 June 2012. She has been qualified in her duty position since the completion of BOLC.  

3.  The applicant provides:

* National Guard Bureau (NGB) Special Orders Number 199 AR, dated 29 August 2011
* DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report), dated 
9 February 2012
* a memorandum, dated 19 August 2008, from the Office of the Assistant Secretary, Manpower and Reserve Affairs, subject: Reduction in the Time in Grade (TIG) Requirement for Promotion of Reserve Component Officers to First Lieutenant 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  She previously served 1 year, 10 months, and 24 days in the VTARNG in an enlisted status.  She was appointed a 2LT in the VTARNG and took the oath of office on 21 December 2010.

2.  On 29 August 2011, NGB published Special Orders Number 199 AR extending her Federal recognition for her initial appointment as a 2LT effective
21 December 2010.  She was appointed a 2LT in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 21 December 2010.

3.  A DA Form 1059 shows she attended the Engineer BOLC from 21 September 2011 through 9 March 2012.  The form shows she marginally achieved course standards.

4.   On 13 December 2012, she was promoted to 1LT in the USAR effective 
20 December 2012.

5.  There are no orders in her Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR) from the VTARNG promoting her to 1LT.

6.  On 13 December 2012, the NGB published Special Orders Number 421 AR extending her Federal recognition for the purpose of promotion to 1LT in the VTARNG with an effective date of 20 December 2012.

7.  National Guard Regulation 600-100 (Commissioned Officers, Federal Recognition and Related Personnel Actions), then in effect, stated a 2LT would be considered for promotion prior to reaching 2 years of commissioned service and would be extended Federal recognition in the grade of 1LT on the date he or she completes 2 years of time in grade provided they are fully qualified and recommended for promotion.  Before a 2LT was recommended for promotion, a careful evaluation was to be made of the service as a commissioned officer to determine if continued service was warranted.  Particular attention was to be given to any possible grounds for elimination such as demonstrated substandard performance, inaptitude, unfitness, and unsuitability.  

8.  NGB Personnel Policy Memorandum 08-035, dated 25 November 2008, and Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Manpower and Reserve Affairs memorandum, dated 19 August 2008, state "This memorandum establishes Department of the Army Policy authorizing Reserve Component 2LT's on the Reserve Active Status List to be promoted to 1LT with a minimum of 18 months of time in grade and completion of the BOLC, if otherwise qualified."

9.  Authority granted to the Secretaries of the Military Departments in Secretary of Defense Memorandum, subject:  Redelegation of Authority Under Executive Order 12396, dated 9 December 1982, to appoint officers under section 624 of 
Title 10, U.S. Code (U.S.C.), in grade of O-2 and O-3 was rescinded effective 1 July 2005 based on advice from the Department of Justice that prohibits redelegation below the Secretary of Defense of the President's authority to appoint military officers.  All military officer appointments under section 12203 of Title 10, U.S.C., including original appointments, in the Reserve of the Army, Reserve of the Air Force, Naval Reserve, and Marine Corps Reserve, not previously approved by 30 June 2005, shall also be submitted to the Secretary of Defense. 

10.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 12203, provides that appointments of Reserve officers in the grades of lieutenant colonel and below shall be made by the President.  This authority has been delegated to the Secretary of Defense via executive order.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Although it appears the applicant met the requirements for promotion to 1LT on 21 June 2012, promotion to 1LT in the VTARNG is a function of the State.  There is no evidence that she was recommended for promotion to 1LT upon completing 18 months of time in grade.  There are no orders published by the State promoting her to 1LT.  The NGB extended her Federal recognition effective 
21 December 2012.

2.  In the absence of orders published by the State confirming she was eligible and recommended for promotion with an earlier date, there is insufficient evidence to grant her relief.

3.  The only way that the date the applicant was granted Federal recognition to 1LT could be changed would be to show the Secretary of Defense approved her promotion on an earlier date.  However, the ABCMR has no jurisdiction over Department of Defense records and therefore could not make that type of correction.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ___X__ _  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _  X ______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130005968



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001733

    Original file (20140001733.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She states in accordance with National Guard Bureau (NGB)-ARH Policy Memorandum 08-035, a second lieutenant (2LT)/O-1 may be promoted at 18 months of time in grade (TIG) provided he or she has completed the Basic Officer Leadership Course (BOLC) and is otherwise qualified. Army Regulation 135-155 (Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers other than General Officers) states the DOR is the date the officer actually or constructively was appointed or promoted to a specific...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018448

    Original file (20130018448.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 12 April 2013, the NGB published Special Orders Number 97 AR extending her Federal recognition (FEDREC) for her initial appointment in the rank/grade of 2LT/O-1 with an effective date of 8 August 2012. b. Paragraph 2-2 states the effective date of FEDREC for original appointment is that date on which the commissioned officer executes the oath of office in the State. c. Paragraph 2-13 states temporary FEDREC may be extended to an officer who has been appointed in the ARNG of a State and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130022313

    Original file (20130022313.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her records to show she received Federal recognition for an initial appointment as a second lieutenant (2LT) in the Alabama Army National Guard National (ALARNG) on 16 December 2010. c. In accordance with National Guard Regulation 600-100, paragraph 2-2(b), "the effective date of Federal recognition for original appointment is that date on which the commissioned officer executes the oath of office in the State." The effective date of Federal recognition...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016569

    Original file (20140016569.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests: a. correction of his records to show he received Federal recognition for initial appointment as a second lieutenant (2LT) in the Missouri Army National Guard (MOARNG) on 10 April 2012; b. adjustment of his date of rank (DOR) for first lieutenant (1LT) from 25 April 2014 to 10 October 2013; and c. all back pay and allowances as a result of these corrections. The 18-month time-in-grade requirement from his original commissioning date for 2LT to 1LT promotion is based...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003077

    Original file (20130003077.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The orders state the effective date of promotion in the Reserve of the Army and corresponding DOR would be the date the Chief, NGB extends Federal Recognition of state promotion. The Personnel Branch Officer requested the applicant's initial appointment be backdated to 6 May 2011 and that he be promoted and extended Federal recognition to 1LT effective 6 November 2012 without further delay. Therefore, his record should be corrected to show he received an extension of temporary Federal...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006923

    Original file (20130006923.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He provides a memorandum for this Board from Chief Warrant Officer Four (CW4) CAH, the Personnel Branch Chief, State of Ohio Adjutant General's Department, subject: Correction of ARNG Initial Appointment Effective Date and Subsequent Promotion for (applicant's name), dated 14 February 2013. The advisory official recommended approval of the applicant's request and that the following actions be taken: * amend NGB Special Orders Number 402 AR, dated 19 November 2012, to reflect the applicant's...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120014944

    Original file (20120014944.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Paragraph 2-2 states the effective date of Federal recognition for original appointment is the date on which the commissioned officer executes the oath of office in the State. The State promoted her to 1LT on 5 June 2012. Accordingly, the NGB extended her Federal recognition for this grade with an effective date and DOR of 5 June 2012.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021544

    Original file (20130021544.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Also on 3 August 2011, the applicant executed an oath office, at Ann Arbor, MI, recording the date of acceptance of appointment as a Reserve commissioned officer of the Army on that date. a. Paragraph 2-2 states that the effective date of Federal recognition for original appointment is the date on which the commissioned officer executes the oath of office in the State. However, the evidence of record shows the applicant executed an NGB Form 337 for appointment in the State on 21 September...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002289

    Original file (20130002289.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her date of Federal recognition as a second lieutenant (2LT) to 25 September 2010 and promotion to the rank of first lieutenant (1LT) effective 25 March 2012. However, had the application for permanent Federal recognition been properly and timely processed, the applicant’s date of rank for 2LT would have been 25 September 2010 and her date of rank for promotion to the rank of 1LT would have been 25 March 2012. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028861

    Original file (20100028861.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Temporary Federal recognition may be extended to an officer who has been appointed in the ARNG of a State and found to be qualified by a Federal Recognition Board pending final determination of eligibility and appointment as a Reserve commissioned officer of the Army. Records show the applicant was granted temporary Federal recognition effective 21 March 2009 upon her initial appointment in the HIARNG as a 2LT. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...