Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005949
Original file (20130005949.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  29 October 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130005949 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states that after receiving a head wound in Vietnam on 31 March 1968, the Purple Heart was not recorded in the appropriate form in his Military Personnel Records Jacket.  He contends that the wound is recorded in his medical records and is acknowledged by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214, VA Rating Decision, and page 4 of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 7 December 1966.  He was awarded military occupational specialty 35D (Meteorological Equipment Repairman) upon completion of initial entry training.  He was honorably discharged on 4 January 1967 for immediate enlistment in the Regular Army.  On 5 January 1967, he enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 3 years.

3.  His DA Form 20 shows he arrived in Vietnam on 23 March 1968.  He was assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Battery, Division Artillery, 9th Infantry Division.  He departed Vietnam on or about 7 August 1969.

4.  Item 40 (Wounds) of his DA Form 20 is blank and item 41 (Awards and Decorations) does not show the Purple Heart.

5.  There is no evidence in his military records that indicates he was awarded the Purple Heart or that he was treated for a combat-related wound.

6.  He was honorably released from active duty on 8 August 1969.  His DD Form 214 does not show the Purple Heart as an authorized award.

7.  A review of the Adjutant General's Office Casualty Division's Vietnam Casualty Listing does not show the applicant's name as a combat casualty.

8.  A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System, an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the U.S. Army Human Resources Command Military Awards Branch, failed to reveal any orders for the Purple Heart pertaining to the applicant.

9.  He provides a VA Rating Decision that shows he was granted service-connected compensation for a head laceration claimed as residuals of a gunshot wound to the head.  The rating decision further indicates that treatment records show the applicant was treated on 31 March 1968 for a laceration to his scalp which occurred after he fell and hit his head.

10.  The medical records mentioned in the VA Rating Decision are not available for review.  


11.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show award of the Purple Heart has been carefully considered.

2.  His DA Form 20 contains no entries indicating he was wounded in action and there is no evidence in his military records that indicates he was treated for a combat-related wound.  His name is not listed on the Vietnam casualty listing.  The governing regulation requires that substantiating evidence must be provided to verify the injury was the result of hostile action and that the injury required treatment by medical personnel.  In the absence of such evidence, the VA Rating Decision which does not indicate the circumstances surrounding his injury, is insufficient evidence on which to base award of the Purple Heart.

3.  In view of the foregoing, there an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ___X__ _  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case 

are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _  X ______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130005949



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130005949



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002745

    Original file (20130002745.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) Record of Proceedings (ROP) in Docket Number AR20100027520 * Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Rating Decision * 33 pages of progress notes and allied documents from the VA CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. His record contains a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) which does not show his record was corrected to show award of the Purple Heart or Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016595

    Original file (20090016595.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides a copy of a DA Form 2173 (Statement of Medical Examination and Duty Status), dated 7 December 1967; a DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board Proceedings), dated 16 February 1968; and his DD Form 214 in support of his application. There is no evidence of record which shows he was wounded in action during his tour in Vietnam. In the absence of any other corroborating evidence of record which shows the applicant was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005643

    Original file (20130005643.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Neither of these forms show any evidence indicating he had been wounded while serving in Vietnam. His Army Military Human Resources Record (AMHRR), formerly known as the Official Military Personnel File (OMPF), does not contain any documentation indicating he was wounded in action or that he was awarded the Purple Heart. He provides a USARV Form 130-R that shows: * the report was submitted by a chief warrant officer two at 1930 hours on 24 October 1968 * on 24 October 1968, the applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021351

    Original file (20120021351.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides: * a self-authored statement * a letter to a MOC * Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) Record of Proceedings * 2 letters from the VA * VA Rating Decision CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. It states the Purple Heart is awarded to members wounded in action and states that in order to award the Purple Heart, there must be evidence the wound for which the award is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002893

    Original file (20110002893.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR), Record of Proceedings, indicates he received medical treatment for his injury on 26 August 1969, but does not mention that it occurred and was treated on 25 August 1969. b. A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to reveal any evidence he was authorized or awarded the Purple Heart. The evidence of record indicates the documents he provides originated from his military service records and that they were...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017857

    Original file (20130017857.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * he was combat wounded in Vietnam * during a firefight in the jungles of Vietnam he sustained shrapnel wounds in the left forearm and left side of his head 3. The Purple Heart requires evidence to verify: * the wound was the result of hostile action * treatment of the wound by medical personnel * documentation of the wound in official records 3. In the absence of corroborating evidence showing he was injured and treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015555

    Original file (20130015555.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence in the available records which shows the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. There is no evidence in the available records and he provides no evidence that shows he was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001728

    Original file (20130001728.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Purple Heart. A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to reveal any evidence that shows he was wounded in action or that he was awarded the Purple Heart. However, the evidence the applicant provides in the form of a newspaper article and an unidentified VA medical record provide insufficient evidence to support award of the Purple Heart.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021260

    Original file (20090021260.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, he is entitled to award of the Purple Heart due to the fact he sustained an injury to his head while serving on active duty during the Vietnam Era. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. Absent evidence which conclusively shows that the applicant sustained wounds or injuries as a result of hostile action...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020198

    Original file (20110020198.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His complete medical records were not available for review. In the absence of official documentary evidence to corroborate the events that led to his injury, or additional documentation that conclusively shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action and treated for those wounds, there is insufficient evidence upon which to award him the Purple Heart in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110020198 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF...