Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005429
Original file (20130005429.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		
		BOARD DATE:	  23 May 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130005429


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests the recouped amount of $3,480.88 for the Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) incentive be paid back to him.

2.  The applicant states he enlisted in the California Army National Guard (CAARNG) with the good faith that his recruiter and the Military Entrance Processing Station (MEPS) were following the proper protocol regarding his SLRP enlistment incentive.  At the time of his enlistment, he was entitled to this incentive.  He continues to honorably serve in accordance with his contractual obligation.

3.  The applicant provides:

* DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document)
* Annex S (SLRP Addendum - ARNG) to DD Form 4
* DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty)
* CAARNG notification letter of incentive discrepancy
* Various loan documents

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the CAARNG on 18 October 2005 for a period of
8 years.  His DD Form 1966/3 (Record of Military Processing) shows in item 32 (Specific Option/Program Enlisted For) the entry:
* 
Assignment to Detachment 1, 140th Chemical Company
* Enlistment bonus and MGIB Kicker
* Standard Training Option

2.  In connection with this enlistment, he completed Annex S to DD Form 4.  However, the addendum was signed on 15 November 2005, not on the same date he enlisted.  He indicated he understood:

* Upon his enlistment in the ARNG, he would be eligible for the SLRP under the Selected Reserve Incentive Program (SRIP)
* He was enlisting in the critical military occupational specialty (MOS) 42A (Human Resources Specialist)
* He had existing loans in the amount of $4,000.00

3.  He entered active duty for training (ADT) on 15 November 2005 and he completed the required training for MOS 42A.  He was honorably released from ADT on 14 April 2006.

4.  He continued his service with the 140th Chemical Company.  Additionally, he entered active duty on 13 February 2012 and he subsequently served with this unit in Kuwait from 10 April to 18 December 2012.  He was honorably released from active duty on 12 January 2013.

5.  On 15 February 2013, by memorandum, the CAARNG notified the applicant that there was a discrepancy in his SLRP incentive payment.  A payment had been made in the amount of $3,480.88 that was in violation of Department of Defense Instruction (DODI) 1205-21 (Reserve Component Incentive Program Procedures), section 6.2 and section E8.1.2.1.

6.  During the processing of this case, on 4 April 2013, an advisory opinion was obtained from the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1.  The advisory official recommended approval of the applicant's request.  He stated an administrative error that resulted in the applicant's SLRP addendum on 15 November 2005 caused the ARNG to recoup the money nearly 8 years after he enlisted.  Had the addendum been signed on his enlistment date, the incentive would have been authorized.

7.  On 4 April 2013, a copy of the advisory opinion was provided to the applicant for information and to allow him the opportunity to submit comments or a rebuttal. He did not respond.

8.  DODI 1205.21 prescribes policy, assigns responsibilities, and prescribes procedures for management of the Reserve Component incentive programs.  It states in Section 6.2 (Written Agreements), as a condition of the receipt of an incentive covered by this Instruction, each recipient shall be required to sign a written agreement stating that the member has been advised of and understands the conditions under which continued entitlement to unpaid incentive amounts shall be terminated and which advance payments may be recouped.  That agreement shall clearly specify the terms of the Reserve service commitment that authorizes the payment of the incentive to the member.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the CAARNG on 18 October 2005.  Nearly a month later, on 15 November 2005, he and his recruiter signed an addendum authorizing him the SLRP incentive.  He received the amount of $3,480.88.

2.  Nearly 8 years later, as a result of an audit conducted by the CAARNG, it was determined he did not execute his SLRP addendum on the same date he executed his enlistment contract.  Accordingly, the State initiated action to recoup the amount that had been paid.

3.  The applicant enlisted in good faith.  He continues to serve and/or fulfill the requirements of his contractual obligation.  He was made a written promise by his recruiter.  He should not be penalized for errors committed by his recruiter or State officials.  As a matter of equity, his record should be corrected to show he executed the SLRP annex on the same date he enlisted and the recouped amount should be paid back to the applicant.

4.  In view of the foregoing, the applicant's record should be corrected as recommended below.

BOARD VOTE:

___x__  ___x_____  ___x_____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that the state Army National Guard records and the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

* amending Annex S of his DD Form 4, dated 15 November 2005, to show it was signed on 18 October 2005
* paying him, from Army National Guard funds, the recouped amount of $3,480.88



      __________x_____________
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130005429



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130005429



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000078

    Original file (20150000078.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * he was erroneously paid the SLRP incentive while deployed in 2005 * if not for the erroneous payment, he would have been eligible for SLRP when he later reenlisted in 2011 when the SLRP maximum was $50,000 * he was first made aware that he was not eligible for SLRP payment due to being a dual-status military technician through the California Army National Guard (CAARNG) Incentives Task Force audit process * he mobilized in January 2005 while serving as a dual-status...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003121

    Original file (20150003121.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He stated/acknowledged: * he was a non-prior service applicant enlisting for 6 years * he was enlisting for the critical Unit Identification Code (UIC) WP7NBD which had been authorized for the SLRP * he was enlisting in a State critical military occupational specialty (MOS) of 11A (Infantry) which had been authorized by the National Guard Bureau (NGB) for the SLRP * he had 17 existing loans in the amount of $15,183.26; he understood the total amount of repayment for qualifying loans would...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013385

    Original file (20140013385.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    e. He was commissioned as an officer on 3 November 2005. f. He requests relief from recoupment of the $6,000.00 OAB and preparation of an OAB addendum for the date he graduated from the officer basic course (OBC) on 1 August 2006. g. Through the CAARNG ITF audit process, he also was informed that Soldiers cannot receive an OAB and the SLRP for overlapping periods. The evidence of record shows the applicant received $12,000.00 from the SLRP and $6,000.00 for an OAB. Although there is no...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000189

    Original file (20140000189.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant enlisted in the CAARNG on 28 April 2006 for a period of 8 years. The applicant's DFAS Form 702 (DFAS Leave and Earnings Statement) issued on 13 December 2013 lists an education benefits debt balance in the amount of $6,013.36. As a result, the Board recommends that the state Army National Guard records and the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the Army National Guard did not initiate any recoupment action taken against him for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002328

    Original file (20130002328.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests payment of his student loans per his 2010 California Army National Guard (CAARNG) Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) contract. He signed a Selected Reserve ARNG SLRP incentive addendum on 9 April 2010 with the CAARNG. He was not authorized to receive the SLRP incentive because he had previously received an SLRP incentive from the USAR.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019966

    Original file (20130019966.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he was approved for the contracted amount of $10,000.00 in accordance with the terms of his Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) Addendum. The applicant states: * on 20 September 2001, he enlisted in the California Army National Guard (CAARNG) and signed an SLRP Addendum * he attended Officer Candidate School (OCS) and on 21 August 2004 he accepted a commission as an officer * although he was eligible for the SLRP...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018945

    Original file (20140018945.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect: a. after having prior service in the U.S. Air Force, he enlisted in the Connecticut Army National Guard (CTARNG) in December 2007; b. in July 2008, he applied for an interstate transfer to the California Army National Guard (CAARNG) and in December 2008 inquired about his SLRP benefits; c. Master Sergeant (MSG) J_____ informed him he qualified for the SLRP and that she would process his payments directly to Sallie Mae; d. through an audit process conducted by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010226

    Original file (20130010226.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests relief of recoupment of $5,103.45 under the Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) for the period 2001 to 2004. In the 24 April 2013 memorandum, the CAARNG stated the applicant was eligible for 4 payments of $787.50 for a total of $3,150. As a result, the Board recommends that all State Army National Guard and Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing a request to allow payment of the total SLRP amount paid on the applicant's...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011165

    Original file (20140011165.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests: a. correction of his records to show he executed a Health Professionals Loan Repayment Program (HPLRP) Agreement and relief from recoupment of $47,600.00 paid toward student loans under the HPLRP and b. creating an executed HPLR agreement and that he be permitted to sign and date the DA Form 5536-R (Agreement-HPLR), the amendment to DA Form 5536-R, any other necessary documents. d. The applicant was audited by the CAARNG Incentives Task Force (ITF) and the audit...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000505

    Original file (20140000505.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * he made a valid contract with the U.S. Government to receive the CRSB and detrimentally relied on the California Army National Guard (CAARNG) incentive system for receiving the SLRP * he received the incentive payments around May and June 2008 * he fulfilled his obligations for those incentives and it would be unjust and contrary to good conscience to recoup them * he received notification from the CAARNG Incentive Task Force (ITF) that he owed $83,000.00 for an...