Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005180
Original file (20130005180.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  31 October 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130005180 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, consolidation of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) and DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214), into a single, updated DD Form 214.

2.  The applicant states he would like his entire record reviewed, including the military occupational specialties (MOS) in which he served, awards he received, and combat tours in which he served.  He would like the results of that review to be consolidated into a single, updated document.  He states the data was never previously consolidated.

3.  The applicant provides:

* Orders P07-949035 AO1, issued by the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC), St. Louis, MO, dated 21 July 2011
* DD Form 214 for the period ending 11 July 1991
* his 2-page DD Form 215, dated 10 September 1992

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 

3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  On 21 January 1971, the applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States.  On 27 October 1972, he was honorably released from active duty for seasonal employment and he was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Annual Training) to complete his remaining service obligation.  His DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for this period of service shows he completed 1 year, 9 months, and
7 days of total active service, including 11 months and 9 days of foreign service in Vietnam.

3.  On 29 November 1990, he was ordered to active duty in support of Operation Desert Shield/Desert Storm.  His USAR unit deployed to Southwest Asia (SWA) from on or about 2 January 1991 through on or about 28 June 1991.

4.  On 11 July 1991, he was honorably released from active duty to the control of his USAR unit.  He was issued a DD Form 214 for this period of mobilized service.

5.  On 10 September 1992, he was issued a 2-page DD Form 215 to correct errors or omissions related to his DD Form 214 for the period ending 11 July 1991.

6.  The applicant was placed on the Retired List, effective 21 January 2012.

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Personnel Separations - Separation Documents), in effect at the time, prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  Paragraph 2-7 of the version currently in effect provides that once a DD Form 214 has been issued, do not reissue except for the following reasons:

	a.  When directed by proper appellate authority, Executive Order, or by the Secretary of the Army.

	b.  When it is determined that the original DD Form 214 cannot be properly corrected by issuance of a DD Form 215 or if the correction would require issuance of more than two DD Forms 215.
	c.  When two DD Forms 215 have been issued and an additional correction is required.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant requests consolidation of his DD Forms 214 and DD Form 215 into a single, updated DD Form 214.

2.  The evidence of record shows he initially served in the Army of the United States.  He was honorably released from active duty, issued a DD Form 214, and was then transferred to the USAR.  He served continuously in the USAR until he was placed on the Retired List.

3.  He was mobilized in support of Operations Desert Shield and Desert Storm, and upon his honorable release from active duty he was issued a second
DD Form 214.  Later, he was issued a DD Form 215 to correct certain errors or omissions related to this DD Form 214.

4.  The DD Form 214 is a summary of a Soldier’s most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.  Consolidation of two or more periods of service for which a DD Form 214 was previously issued into one DD Form 214 is not authorized.

5.  His two 2 separate DD Forms 214 and his DD Form 215 accurately reflect the circumstances of his service.  The regulatory provisions governing the preparation of DD Forms 214 do not provide for consolidating multiple periods of 
active duty service into a single DD Form 214.  Additionally, regulatory provisions provide that a DD Form 214 will only be reissued when two DD Forms 215 have been issued and an additional correction is required.  His record contains a single DD Form 215; as such, there is no basis for issuing a new DD Form 214 at this time.  Accordingly, there is no error or injustice in this case.

6.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.








BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case 
are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      ____________X___________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100000736



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130005180



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064123C070421

    Original file (2001064123C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that his records do not reflect his award of the Air Assault Qualification Badge (officially the Air Assault Badge), his service in three campaigns in Vietnam which include the Counteroffensive Phase VII, Consolidation I and Consolidation II, the arrowhead device to indicate his participation in combat air missions, and that he earned three overseas service bars. The same regulation provides that one bronze service star is authorized for the Vietnam Service Medal for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007693

    Original file (20080007693.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests reconsideration of the Board’s denial of her request to correct her separation document (DD Form 214) to show that her pay grade was E-4 upon her release from active duty and to reflect that she participated in Operation Desert Shield/Desert Storm. The DD Form 215 dated 18 March 1997 shows that the applicant's record was corrected to show specialist four, E-4. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005280

    Original file (20130005280.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect: a. correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 8 May 1991 to add the Army Service Ribbon, Sea Service Deployment Ribbon, Meritorious Unit Commendation, Army Achievement Medal, Armed Forces Reserve Medal, Army Reserve Components Achievement Medal, certificates of achievement, and training. His record contains a DD Form 215, dated 12 March 1992, that corrected his DD Form 214 for the period...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015638

    Original file (20130015638 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    For a Reserve Soldier ordered to active duty and deployed to a foreign country, enter the following three statements in succession: (1) "ORDERED TO ACTIVE DUTY IN SUPPORT OF (OPERATION NAME)." As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. adding following entries to block 18 on the applicant's 20 December 1991 DD Form 214: (1) "ORDERED TO ACTIVE DUTY IN SUPPORT OF OPERATION DESERT SHIELD/DESERT STORM." b. deleting...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070004752

    Original file (20070004752.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his record to show an earlier date of rank, higher pay grade, educational training, overseas service in Germany, and any awards he is entitled to receive based on his service in Kuwait and Operation Desert Storm. The applicant provided copies of a self-authorized letter, dated 8 March 2007; DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action), dated 24 June 1991; Diploma from the Region I Noncommissioned Officer Academy; Certificate for completion of the Primary...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023808

    Original file (20100023808.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his foreign service in Korea and to show award of the Korea Defense Service Medal. The evidence of record shows the applicant served in Korea during a qualifying period of service for award of the Korea Defense Service Medal which is not shown on his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070002811C071029

    Original file (20070002811C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Gerald J. Purcell | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant's Personnel Qualification Record (DA Form 2-1) shows, in Item 5 (Overseas Service) that he served in Saudi Arabia from December 1990 through May 1991. The evidence of record confirms DD Forms 215 correcting the applicant's 23 June 1991 DD Form 214 were issued on 17 September 1992 and 18 May 1993.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020370

    Original file (20090020370.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the following awards: * Army Reserve Components Achievement Medal * National Defense Service Medal * Noncommissioned Officer (NCO) Professional Development Ribbon * Southwest Asia Service Medal (SWASM) with 2 bronze service stars * Kuwait Liberation Medal (Kuwait) * Kuwait Liberation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009866

    Original file (20080009866.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214 does not show he was awarded the Army Achievement Medal. Item 13 of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows he is authorized the Kuwait Liberation Medal. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to the reserve obligation termination date, the Bronze Star Medal, the Purple Heart, the Defense of Saudi Arabia, Liberation and Defense...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060007195C070205

    Original file (20060007195C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    A DD Form 215, dated 23 March 1992, amended the applicant’s DD Form 214 for the period ending 1 March 1992, to show he entered active duty on 9 December 1991 and was released from active duty on 22 March 1992. However, except for the DD Forms 214, this Board does not have a record of what other active duty service the applicant may have. As a result, the Board recommends that the State Army National Guard records and all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...