Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005062
Original file (20130005062.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		
		BOARD DATE:	  16 May 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130005062 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 20 November 2011 to show his rank/grade as sergeant (SGT)/E-5 vice specialist (SPC)/E-4.

2.  The applicant states:

	a.  He was attached to Company G, 1st Battalion, 15th Field Artillery, Korea, when he was demoted from SGT/E-5 to SPC/E-4 without any reason or paperwork.  He asked why he was demoted and he was told it was probably because he did not complete the Primary Leadership Development Course (PLDC) or the Warrior Leadership Course (WLC) and his U.S. Navy leadership school did not count.  He believes this is an error because PLDC and WLC are only required for promotion to staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6 and not for SGT/E-5.

	b.  He never received any paperwork or demotion orders.  He was just a SGT one month, then SPC the next month for pay and on his Enlisted Record Brief (ERB).  He tried all avenues to have this corrected but it ruined his military career by forcing him out due to reaching his retention control point (RCP).  He is now serving in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) as an SPC because that is what his orders say.  He should still be a SGT and he should never have lost his rank.

3.  The applicant provides no additional evidence.


CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Having had prior enlisted active service in the U.S. Navy, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) in the rank of SGT on 21 August 2008 and he held military occupational specialty 91B (Wheeled Vehicle Mechanic).  On 26 June 2009, he was assigned to Company G, 302nd Combat Support Battalion, Korea.

2.  On 25 January 2010, he accepted nonjudicial punishment under the provisions of Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), for unlawfully striking another Soldier in the face with his closed fist.  The punishment imposed was 14 days extra duty and 14 days restriction.  This DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceedings under Article 15, UCMJ) shows his rank as SGT.

3.  On or about 15 June 2010, he departed Korea and he was subsequently assigned to the Rear Detachment, 1st Battalion, 1st Armor Brigade, Fort Hood, TX.

4.  His records contain a:

	a.  DD Form 2648 (Preseparation Counseling Checklist for Active Component Service Members), dated 13 April 2011, wherein his grade is shown as E-4.  He authenticated this form by placing his signature in the appropriate block on that date.

	b.  DD Form 93 (Record of Emergency Data), dated 18 August 2011, wherein his rank is shown as SPC.  He authenticated this form by placing his signature in the appropriate block on that date.

	c.  DA Form 5960 (Authorization to Start, Stop, or Change Basic Allowance for Quarters (BAH), and/or Variable Housing Allowance (VHA)) that he completed on 3 December 2011.  He listed his rank as SPC and he authenticated this form by placing his signature in the appropriate block on that date.

5.  Orders 196-0128, issued by Headquarters, III Corps, Fort Hood, TX, dated
15 July 2011, discharged him from the RA and assigned him to the 141st Transportation Detachment, Dayton, OH, effective 20 November 2011.  These orders show his rank as SPC.

6.  His records contain an ERB, dated 18 July 2011, wherein his rank is shown as SPC and his date or rank to SPC is shown as 22 April 2010.


7.  Orders 258-0148, issued by Headquarters, III Corps, Fort Hood, TX, dated 15 September 2011, amended Orders 196-0128, that further assigned him to Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 413th Civil Affairs (CA) Battalion, Lubbock, TX.  These orders show his rank as SPC.

8.  On 20 November 2011, he was honorably discharged from the RA.  He enlisted in the USAR and he was assigned to the 413th CA Battalion, Lubbock, TX.  He completed 3 years and 3 months of net active service during this period.

9.  The DD Form 214 he was issued for this period of service shows in:

	a.  Items 4a (Grade, Rate or Rank) and 4b (Pay Grade) the entries SPC and E-4, respectively.

	b.  Item 12i (Effective Date of Pay Grade) the entry 22 April 2010.

	c.  Item 18 (Remarks) he was entitled to full involuntary separation pay and received $30,004.11 in separation pay.

10.  He authenticated this DD Form 214 by placing his electronic signature in the appropriate block on 26 September 2011.

11.  His record is void of orders showing his reduction to SPC or the reason for his reduction.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record indicates the applicant was reduced to the rank of SPC on 22 April 2010.  Although his record is void of the specific facts and circumstances surrounding his reduction to SPC, his record contains many documents that show he held the rank of SPC after 22 April 2010.  He authenticated many of these documents by placing his signature in the appropriate block indicating the information on the documents was correct.

2.  In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it is presumed what the Army did in his case was correct and that his DD Form 214 correctly shows his rank/grade as SPC/E-4.

3.  In view of the foregoing, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.


BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__x___  ___x_____  ____x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________x_____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130005062



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130005062



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019947

    Original file (20090019947.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The advisory official stated that after a thorough review of the applicant's records, his office recommends his reinstatement to the rank of SFC with the understanding that he will not be eligible for promotion to master sergeant (MSG) until he completes all required NCO education courses. Neither promotion order indicates his promotion was conditional upon completion of NCOES. a. Paragraph 1-27 (NCOES Requirement for Promotion and Conditions Promotion) states that a Soldier must be a WLC...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000209

    Original file (20150000209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, promotion to sergeant (SGT)/pay grade E-5 effective 1 August 2013 and all back pay due as a result. The applicant provides: * four promotion point worksheets (PPW) – Unofficial Copy * an HRC memorandum, subject: Department of the Army Promotion Point Cutoff Scores for 1 August 2013 and Junior Enlisted Issues for the Active Army (AA) * a memorandum, subject: Request an Administrative Records Correction (ARC) for [Applicant], issued by Headquarters, 532nd...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021322

    Original file (20110021322.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 1 May 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110021322 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Paragraph 8-2 identified the NCOES course requirement for promotion and stated the requirement for promotion to SSG/E-6 was completion of BNCOC. The evidence of record confirms the applicant’s promotion to SSG/E-6 was conditional and contingent on his completion of BNCOC, which was the NCOES education requirement necessary to qualify for promotion to SSG/E-6 in effect at the time.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014443

    Original file (20080014443.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no indication or evidence in the applicant's records that she was enrolled in or completed Phase II of MOS 54B BNCOC as stipulated in her promotion orders. The evidence of record further shows the applicant was conditionally promoted to SSG/E-6 on 30 June 1998 in MOS 54B contingent upon her successful completion of BNCOC. With respect to the applicant's contention that she should be considered for promotion to SFC/E-7, there is no evidence that the applicant met grade and/or NCOES...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008590

    Original file (20120008590.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests reconsideration of his earlier request for correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show awards of the: * Expert Infantryman Badge * Humanitarian Service Medal * Military Outstanding Volunteer Service Medal 2. The applicant's records do not contain and he did not provide: * official orders awarding him the Expert Infantryman Badge * orders, memoranda, or certificates showing he qualified with any additional weapon systems...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015414

    Original file (20110015414.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was awarded three awards of the AAM. Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show the completion of this military education course.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015331

    Original file (20100015331.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    CAARNG orders in the applicant's record in the interactive Personnel Electronic Records Management System show he was transferred among CAARNG units several times after his release from active duty (REFRAD) on 15 March 2005. CAARNG Orders 144-1108, dated 14 May 2006, show the applicant was administratively reduced from SGT/E-5 to SPC/E-4 effective 4 April 2006 by authority of National Guard Regulation 600-200 (Enlisted Personnel Management), paragraph 11-58. The evidence of record...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019141

    Original file (20090019141.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his Enlisted Record Brief (ERB) and DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show pay grade E-6 and reentry (RE) code RE-1. His Enlisted Record Brief, dated 15 March 2006, shows he was reduced to the rank of SGT on 23 March 2005. The record is void of documentation showing he was promoted to pay grade E-6 from the date of his reduction to the date of his discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021880

    Original file (20110021880.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his military records by voiding his reduction in rank to sergeant (SGT), pay grade E-5. b. Paragraph 10-16 (Reductions for Failure to complete Training) provides that Soldiers conditionally promoted in accordance with paragraph 1–27 of this regulation are administratively reduced to the grade previously held upon failure to complete the training requirement established in that provision. The applicant contends that his military records should be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000586

    Original file (20130000586.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 13, enter awards and decorations for all periods of service in the priority sequence specified in Army Regulation 600-8-22. c. Item 14, list the formal in-service (full-time attendance) training courses successfully completed during the period covered by the DD Form 214. Although he may have attended these courses, the evidence of record does not show and he has not provided any evidence that shows he completed either course. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of...