Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004958
Original file (20130004958.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		
		BOARD DATE:	  31 October 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130004958 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart (PH).

2.  The applicant states he was injured while serving on active duty and was told he would receive the award.

3.  The applicant provides copies of his DD Forms 214 covering his two periods of service.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2.  On 19 March 1963, the applicant was inducted in the Army of the United States.  He completed basic combat and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman).  He was released from active duty on 18 March 1965.  He enlisted in the Regular Army on 2 April 1965 and continued to serve until he was honorably released from active duty on 1 April 1968.
  
3.  The applicant's two DD Forms 214 show he earned the following awards during his periods of active duty service:

* National Defense Service Medal (NDSM)
* Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) with 2 bronze service stars
* Two Overseas Service Bars
* Vietnam Campaign Medal (VCM) with Device 1960
* Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14)
* Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB)
* Parachutists Badge

4.  Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in Republic of Vietnam (RVN) with Company A, 2nd Battalion (Airborne), 327th Infantry during the period
8 July 1965 to 25 July 1966.

5.  The applicant’s record is void of orders or documents indicating he was wounded in action in the RVN.  It is also void of medical treatment records indicating he was ever treated for a combat-related wound.  Item 40 (Wounds) of the applicant’s DA Form 20 is blank, and the PH is not included in the list of earned awards in item 41 (Awards and Decorations).

6.  The applicant's name is not listed on the Army Vietnam Casualty Roster.  

7.  Review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS), an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders for the PH pertaining to the applicant. 

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the PH is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile 

action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The criteria for the PH requires the submission of substantiating evidence to verify that the injury/wound was the result of hostile action, the injury/wound must have required medical treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

2.  The applicant's name is not listed on the Vietnam casualty roster and there are no medical records available to show he was treated for wounds as a result of hostile action.

3.  The applicant's contention, sincerity, and his integrity are not in question.  However, in the absence of documentation that conclusively shows he was wounded or injured as a result of enemy action and treated for those wounds, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for awarding him the Purple Heart.

4.  This action in no way diminished the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to our Nation.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X_____  __X__  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case 

are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _X   _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130004958





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130004958



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011963

    Original file (20090011963.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he was wounded in Vietnam and he was never awarded a PH. Additionally, there is no evidence of record and the applicant did not provide any evidence to support meeting the criteria for the award of the PH based on friendly fire as stated in applicable Army regulations. Absent any evidence of record confirming the applicant was wounded in action or treated for a combat-related wound while serving in Vietnam, the regulatory burden of proof necessary to support award of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015820

    Original file (20080015820.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, by regulation, in order to support award of the PH, there must be evidence that a member was wounded or injured as a direct result of or was caused by enemy action, that the wound required treatment by military medical personnel, and a record of this treatment must have been made a matter of official record. Absent any evidence of record to corroborate an injury/wound which the applicant received as a result of enemy action, or that confirms he was wounded in action in the RVN...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017390

    Original file (20130017390.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart (PH) for a shrapnel wound he received in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) in 1969. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides the PH is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060001607C070205

    Original file (20060001607C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, he is entitled to the PH for injuries he received in combat, and the PH should have been included with the list of awards contained on his separation document (DD Form 214). During its original review of the applicant's case, the Board found no evidence of record that showed the applicant was wounded or injured as a result of enemy action, or that he was ever recommended for or awarded the PH by proper authority while serving on active duty. The evidence of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080001949

    Original file (20080001949.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: Enlistment Record (DD Form 4); Enlisted Qualification Record (DA Form 20); promotion and award orders; Report of Medical Examination (SF 88), dated 20 September 1965; Report of Medical History (SF 89), dated 20 September 1965; Military Medical Record treatment records; and separation document (DD Form 214). Absent any evidence of record confirming the applicant was wounded in action or treated for a combat-related...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014978

    Original file (20090014978.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) from 21 April 1969 through 1 April 1971. Item 40 (Wounds) of the applicant's DA Form 20 is blank and the PH is not included in the list of earned awards entered in item 41 (Awards and Decorations).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012989

    Original file (20080012989.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant's record is void of any orders or other documents that indicate he was ever recommended for, or awarded the PH by proper authority and/or of medical treatment records showing he was treated for a combat related wound or injury. However, by regulation in order to support award of the PH, there must be evidence confirming that the wound for which the award is being made was received as...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007779

    Original file (20120007779.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A Standard Form 88 (Report of Medical Examination) and a Standard Form 89 (Report of Medical History) completed at the time of his release from active duty do not show he was wounded as a result of enemy action. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the PH is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. Although the RVN Gallantry Cross orders indicate he was wounded, his service record is void of evidence that he was wounded...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070018667

    Original file (20070018667.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board noted that there were no PH award orders on file in his record and no personnel service record entries that indicated that the applicant was ever wounded in action or awarded the PH. The applicant’s Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) contains no orders or other documents that indicate he was ever wounded in action, or awarded the PH. The applicant was also provided a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) to include these awards.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050006475C070206

    Original file (20050006475C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that he was wounded while serving in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN), but was never recommended for, or awarded the PH. The applicant’s Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) contains no orders or other documents that indicate he was ever wounded in action, or awarded the PH. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned to show his entitlement to the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry...